Home › Forums › In The News › dont you just LOVE the NYT
- This topic has 32 replies, 16 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 2 months ago by ☕️coffee addict.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 7, 2014 5:36 pm at 5:36 pm #613152☕️coffee addictParticipant
i passed a newsstand today and there on the front page on the top no less where everyone can see it is the picture of the floridian palestinian kid who the police bruttaly beat up
i dont remember them posting any front page pictures of the 3 boys
ahh the NY times, all the lopsided news thats fit to print
July 7, 2014 6:41 pm at 6:41 pm #1028786golferParticipantThere are many things I would like to write about the NYT.
But based on past experience, the mildest expressions of disgust will be deleted by the mods.
And mild expressions are not even what I had in mind in this instance.
So that’s about all I can say to you, coffeeaddd…
July 7, 2014 6:52 pm at 6:52 pm #1028787apushatayidParticipantthe NYT makes a great lining for kittys box.
July 7, 2014 7:15 pm at 7:15 pm #1028788dial427436MemberYou insult the kitties lining the box with that.
July 7, 2014 7:48 pm at 7:48 pm #1028789SayIDidIt™ParticipantAnagram for The New York Times, anyone?
SiDi™
July 7, 2014 11:19 pm at 11:19 pm #1028791☕️coffee addictParticipantenemy sit, work
best i could do, trying to think of others with enemy
July 7, 2014 11:21 pm at 11:21 pm #1028792☕️coffee addictParticipanttried it, cant find others
July 9, 2014 3:50 am at 3:50 am #1028793SayIDidIt™ParticipantTry Monkeys Write or Monkey Writes (whichever you prefer)
July 9, 2014 10:32 am at 10:32 am #1028794☕️coffee addictParticipantgood one but its disparaging to monkeys
July 9, 2014 12:22 pm at 12:22 pm #1028795SayIDidIt™ParticipantTrue true!
By the way, is anyone really surprised? The NYT has been doing this for years. Nothing new!
July 9, 2014 2:58 pm at 2:58 pm #1028796🐵 ⌨ GamanitParticipantthe yento w krimes
July 9, 2014 3:39 pm at 3:39 pm #1028797☕️coffee addictParticipanttodays pic
an airstrike on gaza
July 9, 2014 4:20 pm at 4:20 pm #1028798charliehallParticipant“dont you just LOVE the NYT”
No.
They have yet to do tshuvah for parroting the Bush Administration’s lies on Iraq that led to that disastrous war.
And I personally haven’t forgiving them for selling their classical music station WQXR.
July 9, 2014 4:37 pm at 4:37 pm #1028799RedlegParticipantUm…Charlie, what lies were they? Do you mean the lies about the WMDs that the very same NYT is reporting have fallen into the hands of ISIS? I guess sarin and mustard gases aren’t really WMDs, are they? Oh, and don’t give me that business about Bush lying about Iraq’s nuclear weapons. He never said thaey had nukes. He did say that Iraq had WMDs and that the concern was that they could end up in the hands of terrorists. Golly!! Ya think?
July 9, 2014 5:01 pm at 5:01 pm #1028800nishtdayngesheftParticipantCharlie,
The real proof that the NY Slimes is terrible is that they carried Avi Weiss’s anti frum screed against the State of Israel.
And their knee jerk support of the most ridiculously left wing policies.
And their unbelievably anti Orthodox Jewish stance.
But I guess all that is not bothersome to you.
July 9, 2014 5:35 pm at 5:35 pm #1028801☕️coffee addictParticipantcharlie,
i guess covering for obama is their idea of tshuva
July 9, 2014 9:50 pm at 9:50 pm #1028802☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantCharlie, is WQXR appreciably different than it was?
July 10, 2014 12:52 am at 12:52 am #1028804Gryffindorable GirlMemberA good anagram is ENEMY RISK TWO or TEENY SKI WORM
July 10, 2014 1:23 am at 1:23 am #1028805👑RebYidd23ParticipantFact is, good people don’t run for president (most of the time).
July 10, 2014 2:19 am at 2:19 am #1028806charliehallParticipantAh, so the NY Times is ok as long as it parrots Republican lies. Got it.
July 10, 2014 4:30 am at 4:30 am #1028807RedlegParticipantCharlie, there aren’t two realities, one D and the other R. There is only one reality and partisanship does not alter it. The simple fact is that Iraq did posess WMDs and the current news proves it. Whether that was sufficient justification for invasion is arguable (I never thought it was the main reason, but that’s another story). Your buddy John Maynard Keynes was famously quoted in the following exchange. When taken to task for changing his position on a particular issue, he is reported to have said, “When the facts change, I change my mind. What, sir, do you do?”
July 10, 2014 11:25 am at 11:25 am #1028808nishtdayngesheftParticipantCharlie,
The only person who said that there was only one issue with the Slimes was you. On something which history has proven you factually wrong. Which is not surprising.
The fact that they are virulently anti Israel means nothing to you.
That the wildly skew stories about Jewish people, particularly frum people is fine with you.
That they allow themselves to be a platform for Avi Weiss’ rants to increase mamzerim is just peachy.
That they tout one of the worst presidents in History just because race and they praise his communist like policies which are devastating this country gets you tapping your feet?
That they are at the forefront of the moral decline of this country, considering deviant lifestyles to be praiseworthy is aligned with your hashkafos?
I see that it is not just the shitos of college professors that are kruma, but the logic is even more so. There is no other explanation for your exceedingly silly comment, other than misfiring synapses.
July 10, 2014 11:14 pm at 11:14 pm #1028809☕️coffee addictParticipantnisht said it for me
August 18, 2014 7:18 pm at 7:18 pm #1028810☕️coffee addictParticipantthe Times are at it again with a picture of a broken house in Gaza, what shaychis why is this front page news? only the anti-Semitic hags that work for them know the answer to this
August 18, 2014 8:00 pm at 8:00 pm #1028811To be or not to beMemberYou sound surprised
August 18, 2014 9:54 pm at 9:54 pm #1028812Rashi4EverMemberI love the NYT so buzz off.
August 18, 2014 10:55 pm at 10:55 pm #1028814☕️coffee addictParticipant2b,
I sort of am, I would expect if nothing happens they wouldn’t report anything
rashi,
that’s nice, so you don’t have to patronize this thread, I started it and I can post whatever I want!
so you Buzz off :p
August 18, 2014 10:56 pm at 10:56 pm #1028815☕️coffee addictParticipant2b,
I sort of am, I would expect if nothing happens they wouldn’t report anything
rashi,
that’s nice, so you don’t have to patronize this thread, I started it and I can post whatever I want!
so you Buzz off :p
August 19, 2014 2:34 am at 2:34 am #1028816writersoulParticipantNYT actually has some great stuff.
It’s just that their Israel coverage gives me higher blood pressure than a 17 year old should have.
August 19, 2014 2:57 am at 2:57 am #1028817Patur Aval AssurParticipant(You can see it on CrossCurrents)
The Spokesman for Agudah was generally satisfied with their reportage of the Israel-Gaza conflict.
August 19, 2014 3:06 am at 3:06 am #1028818☕️coffee addictParticipantPAA did you see his article on Obama?
I was told he has to say certain things (that’s what spokesmen do) so people don’t get mad, even though he might not mean it
August 19, 2014 3:24 am at 3:24 am #1028819Patur Aval AssurParticipantYes I saw his article on Obama, but I didn’t mention it because it seemed that the intent of this thread was to discuss your displeasure with the New York Times, not to discuss your displeasure with President Obama.
“I was told he has to say certain things (that’s what spokesmen do) so people don’t get mad, even though he might not mean it”
This will obviously take us into murky territory. If you are correct in your assertion then none of his statements carry any weight because we never know if he means it. Which effectively marginalizes Agudah’s position on every matter because pretty much all their statements go through him and he might not mean what he says. Unless you have a way of knowing when he is serious and when he is not.
August 19, 2014 11:23 am at 11:23 am #1028820☕️coffee addictParticipantPAA,
that’s true, the reason I brought that in was because this was what I was told from someone that lives in Staten island and knows him, regarding the Obama piece (which was why I brought this in. I’m extending it to the NYT as well
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.