Does Saying “CE” and “BCE” Kasher the Christian Calendar?

Home Forums Decaffeinated Coffee Does Saying “CE” and “BCE” Kasher the Christian Calendar?

Viewing 48 posts - 1 through 48 (of 48 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #2348157

    I assume the whole “Common Era” shtick was developed by secularists, not by frum yidden, but it’s certainly made the rounds to the point that I wonder if it’s now socially unacceptable to say “AD” as a frum yid.

    Does this really make any sense? Isn’t this just the same thing as getting a Christmas tree and calling it a “Chanuka Bush?” You’re still counting from the same thing either way. The entire dating system is based on the start of Christianity. If it were actually a halachic problem to use it, we wouldn’t even be allowed to use the number.

    #2348254
    Happy new year
    Participant

    What we are saying is that we are not counting the years from the start of their religion, but rather from the Common Era, the accepted year of counting in modern times.

    It is used by secularism as well, so it is just a socially accepted year, hence “Common Era”, of the commonly accepted time.

    Not connected to religion anymore.

    Agav, the years were arbitrarily chosen in 523 CE for one reason: because it was 70 years before the Churban Bes Hamikdash.
    That’s accurate.

    The birth of their god was not then anyway.
    They said that because it was 70 years before the Churban.

    So, it’s actually a Jewish calendar, based on the Churban.
    But I get your point, nonetheless.

    #2348256
    akuperma
    Participant

    Calendars usually choose an arbitrary date. The Romans often used the date of the mythological founding of Rome. For a while the French used the date of their revolution, and America uses the data of independence (on official texts of laws). Many countries until recently used the date of the current monarch coming to the throne. For a while, we often used the date that Alexander is believed to have conquered Eretz Yisrael. The year used in most western countries is a mythological date, and using BCE/CE is a way to make it less insulting for non-Christians. The Talmud clearly allows using non-Jewish dates on documents, so at least they shouldn’t insult us by trying to make every date into a religious statement.

    #2348257

    It isn’t

    Just because the Counci of Nicaea concocted that it was retroactively 325 hasn’t bearing on the actual sysyem

    #2348282
    SQUARE_ROOT
    Participant

    This question is for Orthodox Rabbis and Poskim, not random people from this Coffee Room.
    (No offense intended.)

    The next time you bring a check to the bank for deposit to your bank account,
    try to write the Hebrew Date on the check, instead of the secular date.
    The bank will probably refuse to process your deposit without the secular date.

    #2348284
    Gadolhadorah
    Participant

    Your points about the provenance of the secular calendar system are totally correct but the reality is that we need to use secular calendar dates for most commercial activity, international travel, communications etc. Our protocols regarding corrections to adopt for lunar versus solar calendars, daylight savings versus standard time, arbitrary designations of geographic time zones etc. have each evolved to address distinct problems, some religious in origin and others functionally driven but all somehow accepted by default to make life workable in an increasingly interconnected world.

    #2348321
    Kuvult
    Participant

    Technically the correct way to write “2025”
    Is “2025 years from the birth of our Lord & Savior”
    “Anno Domini” means “Year of our Lord”
    I think that’s the problem some Jews have.
    While every way you look at it we use the Christian calendar there is some difference between (with no choice) recognizing the date used in the culture we live in & outright referring to Yezus as “Our Lord”

    #2348351
    commonsaychel
    Participant

    Are you allowed to eat Facon because its fake bacon?
    are you allowed to eat kani because it imitation crab?
    Can BMG talmidim say cutlery because it the Rosh Yeshiva name?
    Can you call a football a pigskin?
    can you call someone a fat hog?

    Other great thoughts to ponder

    #2348551
    Emunas1
    Participant

    Since the christian version of these acronyms actually refer to a foreign god, then for sure there’s a halachic problem to use them which does not exist with BCE and CE.

    #2348593

    CE (Vulgar Era) is attributed to the astronomer Kepler. I think he used the term when he was showing that it is “wrong” in a sense of being several years of the event his religion was trying to commemorate. So, in that sense, when we use these numbers, we are reminding the velt that they can’t even get their dates right.

    #2348600

    Why not just use traditional numbering “in the 4th year of president Biden”, this seems to be the most common usage during Roman empire and other countries. Roman republic just used the name of one the councilors, given that both of them had one year terms.

    #2348602
    ujm
    Participant

    Neville: You shouldn’t assume just because “people use it” that it is therefore okay for us to use the yearly numbering system. (Forget about the AD/CE question altogether.)

    Many frum Yidden will *not* use the years counting from the Christian Avoda Zora. (Even if it is inaccurate by a few years, that’s what it tries to honor by counting from.)

    #2348633

    “This question is for Orthodox Rabbis and Poskim, not random people from this Coffee Room.
    (No offense intended.)”

    You want me to go and ask an actual posek if saying BCE “kashers” the Christian calendar? I personally think this topic is perfectly located right where it is.

    “What we are saying is that we are not counting the years from the start of their religion, but rather from the Common Era, the accepted year of counting in modern times.”

    But, we are counting from the start of their religion. Saying we aren’t doesn’t change the metzius.

    “So, it’s actually a Jewish calendar, based on the Churban.”

    So then let BC = before churban and AD = after destruction. This way, nobody has to change anything.

    “The year used in most western countries is a mythological date, and using BCE/CE is a way to make it less insulting for non-Christians.”

    I think it’s more insulting to our intelligence to pretend that if you change the letters around it actually makes it no longer revolve around Christianity. That’s kind of my point.

    More than half of the replies here seem to be assuming that I’m wanting to make a new chumra of never mentioning the non-Jewish date. On the contrary, I’m saying we should keep doing it in its former glory with BC and AD because the new letters are meaningless. Obviously it wouldn’t be assur since this is obviously what everyone did until a few decades ago when they invented the CE thing. My point is that the social pressure to switch to CE is silly since you’re either ways using a calendar that revolves around another religion.

    #2348636
    amom
    Participant

    I know people who use the shortened version of ’25 instead of 2025 because of this issue.

    #2348685
    ard
    Participant

    Shortening the date doesn’t accomplish anything

    #2348737
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    UJM

    A maiseh I think you’ll enjoy:

    In shul people were talkign to an old survivor about Europe pre war etc. Someone asked him “ven zent ir geboiren, in Toof resih …?”
    He replied “ven ich bin geboiren hut men nuch nisht azoi gerachent”

    #2348794
    Yserbius123
    Participant

    Should we also change the name of Satmar to something that doesn’t shtim from Saint Mary?

    #2348812
    SchnitzelBigot
    Participant

    @ubiquitin the current practice of using 5785 AM is a relatively recent phenomenon. Until about a thousand years ago, all Jews used the Greek Era (aka minyan shtarot, 2336 AG). But when they came to western europe, they switched to using anno mundi in hebrew deeds.

    #2348829
    pekak
    Participant

    @ubiquitin

    When he was born very few people were from “Toof Kif” they said the last two numbers. I was born in the States as were my parents and 3 of my grandparents. I was raised that ‘77 is only for legal purposes. I was born in 5737.

    #2348903
    Jude
    Participant

    Where I have to use the civil date in a document, I try to use, for example, 25 (without the apostrophe) so that it is not an abbreviation of 2025, but just counting from a year that is as arbitrary as I can make it. Sometimes, however, the form requires the full 4-digit version, so there is no choice. By the way, in wedding invitations for my children, I never placed the civil year, just, for example, “25th May”. The guests won’t arrive a year late!

    #2348936
    jdf007
    Participant

    “Common era” is worse in every way. The word Common means – it is common to all of us and everybody. You took the Christian calendar over all over devices, and called it common, normal, standard – you have just now made all of us follow their ways and told us their days are our days. Outside of this board, even temporary workers of all stripes are forced to take dec 25th off. Telecommuting temporary workers get no exceptions. It is common.
    Because otherwise, are you some type of odd and strange or uncommon person?

    I prefer and I would suggest it is smarter to say AD. If the person was real, and we are counting from a specific event, then at least we’re counting from a historic event. Calling it “common” gives it meaning and proselytizes us as much as saying “happy holiday” on Dec 24/25 and then telling me that the season is over the very next day. It’s not my holiday, stop including me. Call it by it’s proper name, some of you will argue, but if that’s what they call it, then it’s just a day on the Calander like boxing day imo The inclusive version is giving me days I don’t want.

    #2348957
    SQUARE_ROOT
    Participant

    Hundreds of years ago, most Europeans were very religious Christians.

    In our times, many Christians are secularized, and their Christianity is more cultural than religious.

    In our times, even Xmas has become secularized and commercialized;
    for many Christians, Xmas is no longer the very-religious holiday that it was hundreds of years ago,

    What I just said might be Halachically relevant, or maybe not.
    I leave that decision to the Orthodox Rabbis and the Poskim.

    #2348959
    Kuvult
    Participant

    AAQ,
    It was common to count the years from the beginning of the reign of the king (or president, PM, etc). See the Gemarah in Rosh Hashanah.
    The issue of replacing one king with another king when they assume the throne is not a problem.
    But, Yezus is not a “King” like Biden.
    Yezus is the “King of Kings & Lord of Lords”
    So it’d be improper & blasphemous to replace him with a “Regular” King.
    (How i know all this? Don’t ask:-)

    #2349285

    I think “common”, originally vulgar in latin, before vulgar got current negative connotation does not mean anything good, such that “uncommon” is weird.
    Maybe you got corrupted by our democracy that “common” = “popular” = wins the votes …

    It simply means – used by most people (a fact) and it is a common convention to count years so that we do not get into a mess using different years.

    Maybe, it is even better to say VE than CE, the way Kepler said it, if we can get away with calling them Vulgar.

    #2349277

    “But, Yezus is not a “King” like Biden.”

    Does writing his name as “Yezus” kasher it even though the J that’s usually used is probably actually meant to make a Y-sound anyway?

    #2349070
    ☕️coffee addict
    Participant

    Im surprised that Sam Klein hasn’t mentioned that פרשת מקץ is the only parsha that says the amount of words which comes out to 2025 which is our Gregorian year!

    #2349016
    KGN
    Participant

    The most logical conclusion here is that we’re using terms like 2025 for things where the entity uses that term as a frame of reference.

    Such as receiving an email from a company…

    #2349536
    SQUARE_ROOT
    Participant

    If I remember correctly, many Jews traditionally refer to the founder of a certain religion as Yushka Pandrick, because his real father was the Roman soldier whose name was Pandrick.

    #2349611
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    We are indicating that we don’t count the date from some deity of theirs but their designated calendar. We live in a world where their secular calendar is required, so we do the best under the circumstance.

    #2349619

    This discussion is one-sided: obviously, would-be posters who object to the years will not post posts that will have that date posted above their post. Time for a heimishe branch of blogging software with dates from Alexander. AAQ. Year 0 of Trump II.

    #2349772

    Reb Eliezer, I’m genuinely sorry if I’m wrong in about what I’m about to say, but it seems other posts of your’s on here would indicate that you’re old enough to remember when “CE” and “BCE” were not options and everyone had to use BC and AD. Is this not correct?

    Square Root: I’ve certainly heard Yoshka, but never Pandrick.

    #2349789
    ard
    Participant

    NCLM one is allowed to say jesus, thats just his given name, its the second part which is problematic since it means hes mashiach

    #2349816
    WolfishMusings
    Participant

    In the end, does it matter?

    If you live in the United States, you will be asked for your date of birth numerous times in your life by governments and businesses. Unless you are going to never get a passport, State ID, go to a doctor’s office/hospital, register to vote, and probably half a dozen other things I forgot to mention, you will be using it.

    Just about American Rav says that you have to vote, and in order to vote you have to use the secular calendar (try registering to vote while telling them you were born in 5755).

    Just about every American Rav will tell you that if you are seriously ill, you should go to the hospital. Try registering using your Hebrew date of birth.

    I’m not aware of any Rav who says that it is forbidden to get a passport or State ID. To get those, you must use your Gregorian calendar date of birth.

    Ergo, it is certainly permitted to use the Gregorian calendar date for at least certain necessary functions.

    The Wolf

    #2350075
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    Growing up every refrence to yushka included “pandrick”

    I grew up when CE and BCE were in use

    For what its worth it makes sense to me
    the OP said “sn’t this just the same thing as getting a Christmas tree and calling it a “Chanuka Bush?””

    Assuming it is (I can think of differences) yes if a person feels the need to bring in a tree its better to call it a Chanukah bush. seems obviosu to nme – note still not good and I’m advocating against it but seems obviously better than calling it a Christmas tree .
    similarly I’m not into decorating houses with lights but if someone feels the need to blue/white with menoras and magen dovids seems bettter than green/red santas /candy canes

    #2350172

    Neville, CE (first VE – vulgar era) is several hundreds years old. Whether to use it will depend on the culture and pressure to assimilate that vary over time/place.

    #2350244

    “Ergo, it is certainly permitted to use the Gregorian calendar date for at least certain necessary functions.”
    I don’t think anyone is challenging that. This thread is about saying CE/BCE vs. AD/BC

    “Neville, CE (first VE – vulgar era) is several hundreds years old.”
    Source?

    “Assuming it is (I can think of differences) yes if a person feels the need to bring in a tree its better to call it a Chanukah bush.”
    The primary difference is that putting up a Christmas tree is probably actually a issur of chukas hagoyim while using the standard calendar clearly is not. If it’s actually assur, changing the name won’t help. If it’s not assur, which the calendar is not, why bother changing the name?

    #2350410
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    CE is assumed, BCE should be mentioned and AD should not.

    #2350449
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    NC

    I dont understand your question
    1) Are you sure theres no shemetz issur in saying AD . Mishna in Sanhedrin says saying an A”Z is “my God” is a chiyuv sekila. Saying “In the year of our lord 2025 ” sounds adjacent to that
    2) Even if not assur. and not strictly logical ok so what its emotional AD certainly makes me uncomfortable. why is it bad to say somehting that makes people more comfortable even if built on emotion rather than logic ?
    3) I’m not sure there ever was a period where “everyone used BC and AD” These are generally used in historical context no one says “I was born in 1948 AD” or “he died in 1986 AD”) Was there ever popular history books geared to a frum audience that used BC/AD . Artscroll certainly never used it . I have an older History of the JEws written by one Solomon Grayzel published in 1947 that uses BCE/CE. Are you sure BC/AD were in regular use among frum people?

    #2350495

    “CE is assumed, BCE should be mentioned and AD should not.”

    You mean because it icks you out, or are you trying to argue that al pi halachah this should be the case?

    My points against this are the following:
    -CE and BCE didn’t used to exist so obviously people had to use BC and AD
    -I know of no halachic sources mentioning that it’s a problem
    -If the Christian-centric calendar is stam a problem to use, then saying “CE” instead of “AD” isn’t going to change that

    In the absence of any real halachic argument, the question is really just whether or not we as judgemental religious folks should look down on people for using the terminology that was used for over a thousand years instead of adopting the new, PC version.

    If you can bring me a halachic source, then obviously this is another story. I’m not going to put my opposition to political correctness before the Torah, but I will put it before my interest in fleeting, emotionalist, yeshivish social-norms.

    #2350691
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    NC

    Your last post answers my question. thanks

    Except for #3 Are you sure it was in “for over a thousand years”
    To be clear, im not saying it wasn’t but I’m skeptical that it was in such regular use among frum people

    ” but I will put it before my interest in fleeting, emotionalist, yeshivish social-norms.”

    go for it!
    If the point of this thread was to make sure there was no definite halachic source forbidding it, youre probably safe . go for it

    #2350687

    “Neville, CE (first VE – vulgar era) is several hundreds years old.”
    Source?

    J Kepler was writing to prove the “common error”: that their deity was not born in the year 0

    Johannes Kepler (1615). Joannis Keppleri Eclogae chronicae : ex epistolis doctissimorum aliquot virorum & suis mutuis, quibus examinantur tempora nobilissima. Frankfurt: Tampach. OCLC 62188677

    The History of the Works of the Learned. Vol. 10. London. January 1708. p. 513

    #2350760

    “Your last post answers my question. thanks”
    Weirdly it seemed like your post that was up before mine was responding to what I said. I almost wondered if they got rearranged, but I guess I’ve just become very predictable.

    “These are generally used in historical context”
    Right, but sometimes a person needs to talk or write in a historical context. This isn’t necessarily nogeia to everyday life.

    “I have an older History of the JEws written by one Solomon Grayzel published in 1947 that uses BCE/CE.”
    OK, that’s actually a good source that it goes back farther than I thought. After some simple googling, I seem to have mostly just been wrong about everything.

    “J Kepler was writing to prove the “common error”: that their deity was not born in the year 0”
    I’m not sure that would really make him the originator of what we’re talking about. Seems to just be a Biblical chronology shtick that he had. It’s possible that the originators of using CE to purposely de-Christianize and replace AD were actually Jews. For now, I’m pretty much retracting most of what I said as I seem to have been wrong.

    “If the point of this thread was to make sure there was no definite halachic source forbidding it, youre probably safe”
    My point was based on the assumption that it’s mutar, which was based on the assumption that everyone used to do it. I’m now not sure of either of these things.

    #2351062

    to clarify, Kepler actually introduced the term Vulgar Era – seems because he discovered that it does not really correspond to what AD stood for, so he introduced the idea that this is just a convention used by people. This may be an actual good reason to use it – as CE does not correspond to anything in particular.

    you can even explain – I do not want to offend your religion by using the wrong date expression

    #2351224

    “to clarify, Kepler actually introduced the term Vulgar Era”
    Right, but his aim wasn’t to pretend the calendar isn’t Christian. It was just to point out that the chronology is inaccurate (allegedly), which seemed to be something he felt strongly about.

    “you can even explain – I do not want to offend your religion by using the wrong date expression”
    Yeah, but that’s actually a terrible idea. Now, not only are you not using their preferred terms, but you’re also telling them that their calendar is inaccurate.

    For example, if someone used the Hebrew date and said, “I refuse to refer to it as ‘anno mundi’ because that wasn’t actually when the world was created,” would that be a compliment to Judaism or a slight?

    #2353318
    pure yiddishkeit
    Participant

    @Neville Chaimberlin Lo Mes,

    For that very reason, there are many who don’t use the gentile dating system because of what you mention, but then there are otheres that don’t see it as THAT bad….

    #2353428
    commonsaychel
    Participant

    @pure, this guy I know went to a meat restaurant ordered a cheeseburger top with fake bacon and milkshake and did want to pay because the use the gentile dating system.
    PS don’t say dating system here it may cause some single men here to get upset

    #2353487

    “For that very reason, there are many who don’t use the gentile dating system because of what you mention, but then there are otheres that don’t see it as THAT bad….”

    I think the “others” is basically everyone. I have never met anyone who never uses it, but I’ll take your word for it. As for not using “AD” and “BC,” I still don’t understand the logic when you’re still implicitly doing that by using the calendar, but I’m retracting how hard I’m bashing it after learning it goes back further than I realized.

    #2353578

    common > gentile dating system.

    Do you mean bars or tinders? And that is why it was called the Vulgar era.

Viewing 48 posts - 1 through 48 (of 48 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.