Does Saying “CE” and “BCE” Kasher the Christian Calendar?

Home Forums Decaffeinated Coffee Does Saying “CE” and “BCE” Kasher the Christian Calendar?

Viewing 23 posts - 1 through 23 (of 23 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #2348157

    I assume the whole “Common Era” shtick was developed by secularists, not by frum yidden, but it’s certainly made the rounds to the point that I wonder if it’s now socially unacceptable to say “AD” as a frum yid.

    Does this really make any sense? Isn’t this just the same thing as getting a Christmas tree and calling it a “Chanuka Bush?” You’re still counting from the same thing either way. The entire dating system is based on the start of Christianity. If it were actually a halachic problem to use it, we wouldn’t even be allowed to use the number.

    #2348254
    Happy new year
    Participant

    What we are saying is that we are not counting the years from the start of their religion, but rather from the Common Era, the accepted year of counting in modern times.

    It is used by secularism as well, so it is just a socially accepted year, hence “Common Era”, of the commonly accepted time.

    Not connected to religion anymore.

    Agav, the years were arbitrarily chosen in 523 CE for one reason: because it was 70 years before the Churban Bes Hamikdash.
    That’s accurate.

    The birth of their god was not then anyway.
    They said that because it was 70 years before the Churban.

    So, it’s actually a Jewish calendar, based on the Churban.
    But I get your point, nonetheless.

    #2348256
    akuperma
    Participant

    Calendars usually choose an arbitrary date. The Romans often used the date of the mythological founding of Rome. For a while the French used the date of their revolution, and America uses the data of independence (on official texts of laws). Many countries until recently used the date of the current monarch coming to the throne. For a while, we often used the date that Alexander is believed to have conquered Eretz Yisrael. The year used in most western countries is a mythological date, and using BCE/CE is a way to make it less insulting for non-Christians. The Talmud clearly allows using non-Jewish dates on documents, so at least they shouldn’t insult us by trying to make every date into a religious statement.

    #2348257

    It isn’t

    Just because the Counci of Nicaea concocted that it was retroactively 325 hasn’t bearing on the actual sysyem

    #2348282
    SQUARE_ROOT
    Participant

    This question is for Orthodox Rabbis and Poskim, not random people from this Coffee Room.
    (No offense intended.)

    The next time you bring a check to the bank for deposit to your bank account,
    try to write the Hebrew Date on the check, instead of the secular date.
    The bank will probably refuse to process your deposit without the secular date.

    #2348284
    Gadolhadorah
    Participant

    Your points about the provenance of the secular calendar system are totally correct but the reality is that we need to use secular calendar dates for most commercial activity, international travel, communications etc. Our protocols regarding corrections to adopt for lunar versus solar calendars, daylight savings versus standard time, arbitrary designations of geographic time zones etc. have each evolved to address distinct problems, some religious in origin and others functionally driven but all somehow accepted by default to make life workable in an increasingly interconnected world.

    #2348321
    Kuvult
    Participant

    Technically the correct way to write “2025”
    Is “2025 years from the birth of our Lord & Savior”
    “Anno Domini” means “Year of our Lord”
    I think that’s the problem some Jews have.
    While every way you look at it we use the Christian calendar there is some difference between (with no choice) recognizing the date used in the culture we live in & outright referring to Yezus as “Our Lord”

    #2348351
    commonsaychel
    Participant

    Are you allowed to eat Facon because its fake bacon?
    are you allowed to eat kani because it imitation crab?
    Can BMG talmidim say cutlery because it the Rosh Yeshiva name?
    Can you call a football a pigskin?
    can you call someone a fat hog?

    Other great thoughts to ponder

    #2348551
    Emunas1
    Participant

    Since the christian version of these acronyms actually refer to a foreign god, then for sure there’s a halachic problem to use them which does not exist with BCE and CE.

    #2348593

    CE (Vulgar Era) is attributed to the astronomer Kepler. I think he used the term when he was showing that it is “wrong” in a sense of being several years of the event his religion was trying to commemorate. So, in that sense, when we use these numbers, we are reminding the velt that they can’t even get their dates right.

    #2348600

    Why not just use traditional numbering “in the 4th year of president Biden”, this seems to be the most common usage during Roman empire and other countries. Roman republic just used the name of one the councilors, given that both of them had one year terms.

    #2348602
    ujm
    Participant

    Neville: You shouldn’t assume just because “people use it” that it is therefore okay for us to use the yearly numbering system. (Forget about the AD/CE question altogether.)

    Many frum Yidden will *not* use the years counting from the Christian Avoda Zora. (Even if it is inaccurate by a few years, that’s what it tries to honor by counting from.)

    #2348633

    “This question is for Orthodox Rabbis and Poskim, not random people from this Coffee Room.
    (No offense intended.)”

    You want me to go and ask an actual posek if saying BCE “kashers” the Christian calendar? I personally think this topic is perfectly located right where it is.

    “What we are saying is that we are not counting the years from the start of their religion, but rather from the Common Era, the accepted year of counting in modern times.”

    But, we are counting from the start of their religion. Saying we aren’t doesn’t change the metzius.

    “So, it’s actually a Jewish calendar, based on the Churban.”

    So then let BC = before churban and AD = after destruction. This way, nobody has to change anything.

    “The year used in most western countries is a mythological date, and using BCE/CE is a way to make it less insulting for non-Christians.”

    I think it’s more insulting to our intelligence to pretend that if you change the letters around it actually makes it no longer revolve around Christianity. That’s kind of my point.

    More than half of the replies here seem to be assuming that I’m wanting to make a new chumra of never mentioning the non-Jewish date. On the contrary, I’m saying we should keep doing it in its former glory with BC and AD because the new letters are meaningless. Obviously it wouldn’t be assur since this is obviously what everyone did until a few decades ago when they invented the CE thing. My point is that the social pressure to switch to CE is silly since you’re either ways using a calendar that revolves around another religion.

    #2348636
    amom
    Participant

    I know people who use the shortened version of ’25 instead of 2025 because of this issue.

    #2348685
    ard
    Participant

    Shortening the date doesn’t accomplish anything

    #2348737
    ubiquitin
    Participant

    UJM

    A maiseh I think you’ll enjoy:

    In shul people were talkign to an old survivor about Europe pre war etc. Someone asked him “ven zent ir geboiren, in Toof resih …?”
    He replied “ven ich bin geboiren hut men nuch nisht azoi gerachent”

    #2348794
    Yserbius123
    Participant

    Should we also change the name of Satmar to something that doesn’t shtim from Saint Mary?

    #2348812
    SchnitzelBigot
    Participant

    @ubiquitin the current practice of using 5785 AM is a relatively recent phenomenon. Until about a thousand years ago, all Jews used the Greek Era (aka minyan shtarot, 2336 AG). But when they came to western europe, they switched to using anno mundi in hebrew deeds.

    #2348829
    pekak
    Participant

    @ubiquitin

    When he was born very few people were from “Toof Kif” they said the last two numbers. I was born in the States as were my parents and 3 of my grandparents. I was raised that ‘77 is only for legal purposes. I was born in 5737.

    #2348903
    Jude
    Participant

    Where I have to use the civil date in a document, I try to use, for example, 25 (without the apostrophe) so that it is not an abbreviation of 2025, but just counting from a year that is as arbitrary as I can make it. Sometimes, however, the form requires the full 4-digit version, so there is no choice. By the way, in wedding invitations for my children, I never placed the civil year, just, for example, “25th May”. The guests won’t arrive a year late!

    #2348936
    jdf007
    Participant

    “Common era” is worse in every way. The word Common means – it is common to all of us and everybody. You took the Christian calendar over all over devices, and called it common, normal, standard – you have just now made all of us follow their ways and told us their days are our days. Outside of this board, even temporary workers of all stripes are forced to take dec 25th off. Telecommuting temporary workers get no exceptions. It is common.
    Because otherwise, are you some type of odd and strange or uncommon person?

    I prefer and I would suggest it is smarter to say AD. If the person was real, and we are counting from a specific event, then at least we’re counting from a historic event. Calling it “common” gives it meaning and proselytizes us as much as saying “happy holiday” on Dec 24/25 and then telling me that the season is over the very next day. It’s not my holiday, stop including me. Call it by it’s proper name, some of you will argue, but if that’s what they call it, then it’s just a day on the Calander like boxing day imo The inclusive version is giving me days I don’t want.

    #2348957
    SQUARE_ROOT
    Participant

    Hundreds of years ago, most Europeans were very religious Christians.

    In our times, many Christians are secularized, and their Christianity is more cultural than religious.

    In our times, even Xmas has become secularized and commercialized;
    for many Christians, Xmas is no longer the very-religious holiday that it was hundreds of years ago,

    What I just said might be Halachically relevant, or maybe not.
    I leave that decision to the Orthodox Rabbis and the Poskim.

    #2348959
    Kuvult
    Participant

    AAQ,
    It was common to count the years from the beginning of the reign of the king (or president, PM, etc). See the Gemarah in Rosh Hashanah.
    The issue of replacing one king with another king when they assume the throne is not a problem.
    But, Yezus is not a “King” like Biden.
    Yezus is the “King of Kings & Lord of Lords”
    So it’d be improper & blasphemous to replace him with a “Regular” King.
    (How i know all this? Don’t ask:-)

Viewing 23 posts - 1 through 23 (of 23 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.