- This topic has 20 replies, 12 voices, and was last updated 16 years ago by Joseph.
-
AuthorPosts
-
November 17, 2008 12:43 am at 12:43 am #588670noitallmrParticipant
Well? I’ve heard loads of opinions on this matter what do you say? Is one allowed to transfer music from your friends iPod to your own? Copy a Cd to your iPod?
November 17, 2008 2:03 am at 2:03 am #625572yashrus20MemberWolfish musings! Judaism isnt emotion based. Halachah IS right and and wrong.
November 17, 2008 2:16 am at 2:16 am #625573TOHIGHSCHOOLGUYMemberthank you joseph for putting up the original link
November 17, 2008 2:38 am at 2:38 am #625574WolfishMusingsParticipantYashrus,
I’m sure you’ve heard the phrase “Naval B’r’shus HaTorah.”
The Wolf
November 17, 2008 1:17 pm at 1:17 pm #625575ChachamParticipantyashrus how ioronic your name is Yashrus means being straight doing what is right
November 17, 2008 2:47 pm at 2:47 pm #625576jewishfeminist02Member“Halachah IS right and wrong.”
Yet I think we would all agree that there are plenty of things one could do that would be *technically* within the letter of the halacha but would nevertheless violate it in spirit. For example, it would be technically halachically permissible to leave a TV on before Shabbos in order to watch it after Shabbos starts (this is assuming one already owns a TV and watches it during the week; let’s not get into the TV discussion here.) But doing this would without question be wrong for a person who is Shomer Shabbos. I remember asking my fourth-grade teacher this question, and I’ll never forget her answer: “Well, you certainly could, but the question is whether or not you should.”
November 17, 2008 2:58 pm at 2:58 pm #625577noitallmrParticipantRe: Chacham
He is Yashar and is doing what’s right. If he was called Tzaddik maybe you can ask, but Halocho wise he’s perfect!
yashrus20- you owe me one! 🙂
November 17, 2008 5:15 pm at 5:15 pm #625578smh1Memberthere are many grey areas (can you copy one song? two? what if it’s your sister’s cd? what if she’s married? can you copy from someone, intending to erase it later? etc, etc, etc) As in all things, ASK your Rav, and follow what he says. That is your Da’as Torah. Good Luck.
P.S. I think this is such a big nisayon for our generation. it’s so easy to do, noone has to know, so many do it… but in most/many cases, it’s assur!
November 17, 2008 6:07 pm at 6:07 pm #625579smh1Memberalso: what about buying a CD with your friend and both of you copying it? what if you buy it with 15 friends??
November 17, 2008 7:37 pm at 7:37 pm #625580iluvchulentMemberFrom a strictly halachic standpoint, it is Muttar to copy Cd’s. It is YOUR property, and Halacha doesn’t recognize an idea or intelectual concept as something which can be copyrighted, and thus it can’t ever be considered ‘stolen’.
Therefore, many CD’s now say on the flap, that they are not being sold to you-only leased. In this manner, there IS an Issur Geneiva. There is a sefer that was published dealing on the matter of Copyrights (I forgot what it is called) and in that Sefer, he gives advice to those singers who don’t want their CD’s to be copied. He composed a text describing the ‘sale’ as merely being a lease, and therefore subject to the terms of the leasing agreement. I have seen that exact text quoted verbatim on CD flaps. In only those instances where that is written on the CD, is it Geneiva to copy them.
November 17, 2008 8:10 pm at 8:10 pm #625581jphoneMemberwhy not rename this thread: Stealing, is it muttar or assur?
November 17, 2008 8:13 pm at 8:13 pm #625582WolfishMusingsParticipantFrom a strictly halachic standpoint, it is Muttar to copy Cd’s. It is YOUR property, and Halacha doesn’t recognize an idea or intelectual concept as something which can be copyrighted, and thus it can’t ever be considered ‘stolen’.
I wouldn’t go so far as to say that. Historically, Rabbonim *have* issued “copyrights” to publishers of seforim in the past. For example, if someone put through the effort to have a Shas printed in a town, then no one in that area could print another Shas for a certain number of years. This was done to encourage people to print seforim and put the effort into publishing them. If this was done for a work that we would consider “public domain” (such as the Gemara, the Rambam, etc.), then certainly it would have been done for newly created works.
While the historical precedent doesn’t cover copyright as we know it today, to say that Rabbonim did not recognize the idea of intellectual property is just wrong.
The Wolf
November 17, 2008 8:57 pm at 8:57 pm #625583jphoneMemberA look at the haskamos given to mechabrim several hundred years ago, proves wolfish correct. Many haskamos included the cherem against publishing said sefer for x amount of time due to the great effort and expense put into puting out whatever sefer it was.
November 20, 2008 12:35 am at 12:35 am #625584bigmoParticipantI’ve spoken to someone in the music industry about this, and yes, they lose money every time someone copies their music – those copiers would normally buy those cd’s or tapes – and it would seem to fall under the category of geneivah. in mishpacha magazine they had an interview with mbd and he said he loses tons of money from this.
November 20, 2008 12:59 am at 12:59 am #625585yashrus20MemberDear Jewishfeminist02,
Halacha IS right and wrong.
I agree with that statement completely and if you give another example then I may agree with you, but the TV example is flawed. From a technical standpoint it IS assur to leave a TV on for the duration of Shabbos. There are 2 main areas of Shabbos observance, The ‘Zachor’ aspect and the ‘Shamor’ aspect. The ‘Shamor’ aspect deals with the ‘tangible’ rights and wrongs of shabbos (i.e. making a fire and tying a knot). The ‘Zachor’ which means to ‘Remember’ the Shabbos and respect it deals with the ‘abstract’ rights and wrongs of Shabbos which include for example not reading novels on Shabbos and not discussing ‘Sichas Chol’ (weekday topics – sports and Definitely business) This is all brought down Very Clearly in Halacha so let us not waste time debating it. The fact of the matter is that leaving a TV, which although is not part of the 39 melachos, which again are the ‘Shamor’ part, the Torah also says ‘Zachor’ and that means that it is ASSUR to do things that are ‘Uvdah Dechol’ (Weekday Pursuits).
So, a TV, which Clearly falls under that category, is Completely ASSUR Min Hatora contrary to popular belief. Gud Shabbos!
November 20, 2008 1:51 am at 1:51 am #625586illini07MemberWait wait wait. In the (now closed) bowling thread, people were so quick to say that though going into a bar to relax and have a kosher drink with a chavrusa may not be assur al pi halacha, it is WRONG in that it’s not a “kosher place to be” and violates the spirit of the law. Now, here, we have people saying that “al pi halacha” defines “right and wrong” in and of itself and that essentially there is no “spirit of the law.”
Make up your minds, rather than spouting off things when they suit you.
November 20, 2008 3:05 am at 3:05 am #625587JosephParticipantillini:
1. Which 1 individual said something inconsistent between your two referenced threads? I see none.
2. Who said in either thread, to quote you, “there is no spirit of the law”? No one. (Saying that “al pi halacha” defines “right and wrong”, does not exclude a “spirit of the law” issue.)
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.