Home › Forums › Shidduchim › Chosson Card on Display – WDYT?
- This topic has 102 replies, 33 voices, and was last updated 13 years, 10 months ago by truth be told.
-
AuthorPosts
-
February 23, 2011 8:29 pm at 8:29 pm #745719mytakeMember
Regarding the chosson letters on display: If my chosson will write a letter to me I would never dream of putting up for display! Like Poster said:
“…Just to end off, your relationship with your spouse, which is hopefully as beautiful as you make it sound, is the biggest treasure in the world. Love notes in the open, and openly speaking about personal relationships is CHEAP. Your wife, yourself and the bond btwn you, deserve better.”
Same applies to chosson and kallah notes/letters/poems etc.
My god, I cannot believe this needs to be explained to anyone…
February 23, 2011 8:40 pm at 8:40 pm #745720YW Moderator-80MemberJust to end off, your relationship with your spouse, which is hopefully as beautiful as you make it sound, is the biggest treasure in the world
just to illustrate the importance of commas in bringing clarity, read the above sentence without the first comma.
February 23, 2011 8:42 pm at 8:42 pm #745721mytakeMember!!
February 23, 2011 8:47 pm at 8:47 pm #745722WolfishMusingsParticipantPlease capitalize HKBH’s name when used.
Thank you.
The Wolf
February 23, 2011 8:53 pm at 8:53 pm #745723mytakeMemberSorry, you’re right.
February 23, 2011 9:52 pm at 9:52 pm #745724The BuzzMemberJust curious – is one allowed to show affection to their spouse in front of their kids?
February 23, 2011 10:17 pm at 10:17 pm #745725TumsMemberJust curious – is one allowed to show affection to their spouse in front of their kids?
I don’t know about “allowed” (it may not be), but it is improper.
February 23, 2011 10:25 pm at 10:25 pm #745726WolfishMusingsParticipantis one allowed to show affection to their spouse in front of their kids?
As one famous Rav explained it to me:
“Our kids get to see us fight and disagree. Why shouldn’t they see that we can love each other too?”
The Wolf
February 23, 2011 10:36 pm at 10:36 pm #745727WolfishMusingsParticipantbut it is improper.
Please articulate way (specifically addressing one’s own children).
The Wolf
February 23, 2011 10:43 pm at 10:43 pm #745728oomisParticipantDo we not have enough things to say are untzniusdig, that we have to pick on such naarishkeit as this? I think it’s romantic and loving if the chosson DID write it himself. If not, what’s the kasha altogether? Nice to see a young frum man who is not afraid to express his feelings. As with all things of this nature, if you don’t like it, DON’T DO IT.
February 23, 2011 10:49 pm at 10:49 pm #745729TumsMemberOur kids get to see us fight and disagree.
Now that’s the problem. If you’re gonna fight (and I don’t recommend it), at least save it for when the kids aren’t around.
Please articulate way (specifically addressing one’s own children).
For the same general idea why you wouldn’t show affection in front of neighbors.
February 23, 2011 11:12 pm at 11:12 pm #745730☕ DaasYochid ☕Participant“Our kids get to see us fight and disagree. Why shouldn’t they see that we can love each other too?”
That can be done without “showing affection” (I guess it depends on how one defines “showing affection”).
February 23, 2011 11:20 pm at 11:20 pm #745731☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantDo we not have enough things to say are untzniusdig, that we have to pick on such naarishkeit as this?
So does that mean that once the quota of untzniudig things is filled, there are no more objections allowed?
As with all things of this nature, if you don’t like it, DON’T DO IT.
Some people like to object, in the CR, to things they find untzniusdig or otherwise objectionable. “As with all things of this nature, if you don’t like it, DON’T DO IT. “
February 23, 2011 11:30 pm at 11:30 pm #745732WolfishMusingsParticipantNow that’s the problem. If you’re gonna fight (and I don’t recommend it), at least save it for when the kids aren’t around.
In theory, I agree with you 100%. But that doesn’t mean that it works that way in practice.
For the same general idea why you wouldn’t show affection in front of neighbors.
I won’t appear in front of my neighbors in anything other than full dress. Does that mean that if I get up in the middle of the night, I should fully dress before heading out to the bathroom? Is wearing pajamas and a robe not acceptable?
Or is it possible that the members of one’s household are a bit closer to you than the neighbors and can/should see some things that neighbors don’t?
The Wolf
February 23, 2011 11:33 pm at 11:33 pm #745733TumsMemberI can’t say running around your house in pajamas is an aveira, but I know of an adom gadol whose children never saw him in pajamas.
February 23, 2011 11:39 pm at 11:39 pm #745734☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantOr is it possible that the members of one’s household are a bit closer to you than the neighbors and can/should see some things that neighbors don’t?
I agree, but one must be very careful where to draw the line. Seeing affection is not the same as seeing pajamas.
February 23, 2011 11:41 pm at 11:41 pm #745735WolfishMusingsParticipant(I guess it depends on how one defines “showing affection”).
Agreed. You can’t really address that until you make that definition.
The Wolf
February 24, 2011 12:01 am at 12:01 am #745737WolfishMusingsParticipantI can’t say running around your house in pajamas is an aveira, but I know of an adom gadol whose children never saw him in pajamas.
I didn’t say pajamas, I said pajamas and a robe.
Do *you* get *fully dressed* before going to the bathroom in the middle of the night?
The Wolf
February 24, 2011 12:08 am at 12:08 am #745738TumsMemberYou are maskim that you walking around the house in pajamas in inappropriate?
February 24, 2011 12:10 am at 12:10 am #745739WolfishMusingsParticipantOn second thought, don’t bother answering, because it’s really beside the point.
Can’t we simply agree that one’s immediate family is closer than one’s neighbors and that they will can (and should) have greater access to your private home life than your neighbors?
The Wolf
February 24, 2011 12:20 am at 12:20 am #745740WolfishMusingsParticipantYou are maskim that you walking around the house in pajamas in inappropriate?
I don’t know. I don’t do it, but that doesn’t make it inappropriate. Nonetheless, as I mentioned earlier, I don’t want to sidetrack the main discussion with this point about pajamas.
The Wolf
February 24, 2011 12:33 am at 12:33 am #745741WolfishMusingsParticipantWolf. I don’t know why you’re waisting so much time defending your position
I’m a glutton for punishment.
writting a loving note to your spouce is perefectly OK. So is holding hands and even a loving peck on the cheek. If you don’t like it don’t do it
You know, there is a stereotype out there that yeshivish and chassidic marriages are not very loving because they didn’t get to know each other before the wedding and they only dated X number of times or the marriage was arranged or whatever. But then they turn around and say “no, our marriage is very loving.” Without any evidence to the contrary, I’m inclined to believe them when they say this and disregard the stereotype.
But then, some of the same crowd say that it’s assur to express love to your wife or to show affection or the like, even in private*. So I’m sometimes left to wonder how these marriages can *possibly* be loving if the couple wasn’t allowed to get to know each other well beforehand AND they’re not allowed to show affection even in private *after* they’re married.
I’m forced to conclude that either the stereotype is correct (which I don’t really believe) or else some people say one thing but secretly do another.
The Wolf
*(Or, as MR so eloquently put it: …things of affectin between manand wife should be kept as little as possible and even then what theyre is should be kept private. Writing love notes is goyish and chukas akum. )
February 24, 2011 12:41 am at 12:41 am #745742TumsMemberI believe the point about pajamas is related to the discussion at hand. Why aren’t you sure that it would be okay, given your stated position about showing affection in front of your children is okay?
Can’t we simply agree that one’s immediate family is closer than one’s neighbors and that they will can (and should) have greater access to your private home life than your neighbors?
Yes, we certainly can agree on that. For example, at home you might have some lighthearted discussion with your spouse (in front of your children), that you wouldn’t have in front of non-immediate family (even if they were guests in your home). Nevertheless, even though it is less restricting in front of immediate family, there still are restrictions even then.
February 24, 2011 1:06 am at 1:06 am #745743mikehall12382Membernow there is something wrong with PJ’s??
February 24, 2011 2:44 am at 2:44 am #745744oomisParticipant“Some people like to object, in the CR, to things they find untzniusdig or otherwise objectionable. “As with all things of this nature, if you don’t like it, DON’T DO IT. ”
OK, DY, I will state it for the record – I do not find these cards to be untzniusdig or objectionable in any way. I think more women would be happy in their marriages if their husbands would show them such romantic gestures. Maybe a chosson should not hand his kallah a rose when he comes to badeck her, because it is a public display. Maybe saying Harei aht in an audible voice is not tzniusdig, because it binds his kallah to him. Maybe someone can find something unztniusdig in ANYTHING, if they look for it. I believe we have so many bona fide untzniusdig things to worry about, that it is a waste of time to look for it in innocent things.
February 24, 2011 3:04 am at 3:04 am #745745The BuzzMemberIt depends who you are. I do my whole morning in pj’s up to taking the kids to the bus stop – I slip on a long skirt, button my coat and voila! One friend doesn’t step out of her room in pajamas and one has days where she doesn’t get dressed if she doesn’t go out!
February 24, 2011 11:01 am at 11:01 am #745746rabbiofberlinParticipantwolf- continue doing what you are doing…you are the one with the very loving relationship
edited
February 24, 2011 2:33 pm at 2:33 pm #745748always hereParticipantmy son wrote on the florist’s little card “To: ___, I’m so happy you’re going to be my wife! From: Your Chossen”.
OTOH, at my daughter’s vort there was this HUGE, shmancy floral arrangement (the biggest waste of alot of money IMO) with a long, printed poem that we all “awww”ed over, that my daughter’s future shvigger had ordered (for the Chossen) along with the flowers. BTW- a few days later Hostess International called us that they were coming to pick up the vase that the arrangement had been made in. …no comment.
February 24, 2011 2:59 pm at 2:59 pm #745749PosterMemberWolfishMusings, I believe the stereotype comes because chasidish/yeshivish couples dont display effection in public. So pple think it is not there. Believe me, by the time such couples get behind closed doors, they are so excited to do what they cant just do 24 hours a day that there is something REALLY special about it. Secrets are special.
My mother never kissed my father in public, nor did I see love notes, (which now that I am married I am sure there were plenty of) but I KNEW they loved eachother. You felt it in mundane conversation, they NEVER argued in public, they respect eachothers opinion, my mother wakes up early to make my fathers favorite dishes, my father helps out a lot at home etc. all these little things mean a lot more to kids than seeing a love note. Actions speak LOUDER than words (and love notes, even if they are across your whole kitchen).
Wolf, I am sure you have both, you sound like a truly caring husaband, so this is not an arguement towards you, I am just speaking generally about my opinion of public personal relationships.
February 24, 2011 3:20 pm at 3:20 pm #745750oomisParticipantmy son wrote on the florist’s little card “To: ___, I’m so happy you’re going to be my wife! From: Your Chossen”
I LOVE that!!!!!
As to the fancy shmancy flower arrangement you mentioned – if his MOTHER has to order it and sign his name, kinda defeats the purpose, no? Although I am intrigued with the idea of the boy’s mother sending such an arrangement to the kallah and saying, “I am so happy you will be my new daughter. Welcome to the family!”
February 24, 2011 3:26 pm at 3:26 pm #745751mikehall12382MemberWolf keep up the good fight…Your wife is lucky to have a loving affectionate husband (I’m sure many women here would love the same). But have supressed their desire, becasue they know they will never get it from their husbands, thus making the ones that do have this special relationship feel like we are doing something wrong. Which, we are not!
February 24, 2011 3:39 pm at 3:39 pm #745752WolfishMusingsParticipantNevertheless, even though it is less restricting in front of immediate family, there still are restrictions even then.
Of course there are restrictions even then. There are things I won’t do even in front of my kids. But that’s not the same thing as saying that there can’t be *any* affection in front of the kids.
If I had to live my life where I had to be on-guard against showing any emotion except when we were alone in the bedroom, where I could not be myself in front of my kids and close family (and yes, loving my wife is a *very* big part of who I am) and where I had to treat my wife as simply my roommate in front of everyone else, I’d probably become miserable *very* quickly.
The Wolf
February 24, 2011 4:00 pm at 4:00 pm #745753mytakeMemberJust a thought…
Couples that choose not to display open physical affection towards each other in front of their kids, can find the sweetest ways to subtly express their affection anyways.
I’m not married yet, btw, but I’ve seen it, and it’s nice seeing how they save most of it for just the two of them.
February 24, 2011 4:57 pm at 4:57 pm #745755WolfishMusingsParticipantand it’s nice seeing how they save most of it for just the two of them.
And if that works for them, then all the more power to them. I’m not condemning anyone else’s choice of how they relate to their spouses — I’m just railing against those who say that it has to be “my way or the highway.”
The Wolf
February 24, 2011 5:08 pm at 5:08 pm #745756WolfishMusingsParticipantActions speak LOUDER than words (and love notes, even if they are across your whole kitchen).
That’s true… but taking the trouble to compose, create and creatively hide the love notes *are* ACTIONS, not just words.
The Wolf
February 24, 2011 5:20 pm at 5:20 pm #745757gavra_at_workParticipantGo back to two fingers.
February 24, 2011 5:34 pm at 5:34 pm #745758mikehall12382Membermytake…”subtly express their affection….. but I’ve seen it”
February 24, 2011 5:46 pm at 5:46 pm #745759mytakeMembermikehall
We all use speech, body language and actions to express our emotions. Sometimes it’s outright, and sometimes it’s subtle.
Most people pick it up even when its subtle, although some are more perceptive with these things than others.
February 24, 2011 5:56 pm at 5:56 pm #745760apushatayidParticipant….and some seem to look for things.
February 24, 2011 6:07 pm at 6:07 pm #745761mikehall12382Member…or some look where they shouldn’t be 😉
February 24, 2011 6:10 pm at 6:10 pm #745762mytakeMember…and then there are some who display publicly what they shouldn’t
February 24, 2011 6:47 pm at 6:47 pm #745763truth be toldMemberI’ve got one question here. When someone makes an obvious expression of love in public (kissing, affectionately holding hands etc), why are they doing it in public? Is it because:
2) They, for whatever altruistic reason, want others to see it.
February 24, 2011 6:53 pm at 6:53 pm #745764truth be toldMemberalways here: my son wrote on the florist’s little card “To: ___, I’m so happy you’re going to be my wife! From: Your Chossen”
The OP is referring to the shamncy arraignment you mentioned, complete with a mushy poem that goes for $50-150 even $200.
The amount of money is irrelevant (personal finances are not the issue). What is relevant is that these poems disservice the couple, as previously mentioned, and lack in tznius.
February 24, 2011 6:56 pm at 6:56 pm #745765truth be toldMemberoomis1105: I do not find these cards to be untzniusdig or objectionable in any way.
Neither do you find it objectionable for a husband and wife to lock arms while walking in public. Correct?
February 24, 2011 7:22 pm at 7:22 pm #745766gavra_at_workParticipantcomplete with a mushy poem
I have an issue with a mushy poem by a guy in general, let alone an engaged guy.
However, there is a simple solution. Two flower arrangements. One for the general public, and the second for her private viewing pleasure.
February 24, 2011 7:37 pm at 7:37 pm #745767Avram in MDParticipantThe Wolf,
I’m forced to conclude that either the stereotype is correct (which I don’t really believe) or else some people say one thing but secretly do another.
Or, perhaps, you are debating with people who themselves are not married yet.
February 24, 2011 7:40 pm at 7:40 pm #745768apushatayidParticipant“…and then there are some who display publicly what they
shouldn’t”
In which case, its NOT discreet. Which takes us back to the comment that started this.
February 24, 2011 8:54 pm at 8:54 pm #745771mytakeMemberFunny.
February 25, 2011 2:23 am at 2:23 am #745772guy-ochoMemberi would share it. its not like ur putting anything to personal on it. its nice to see the affection by newlyweds
March 1, 2011 2:43 am at 2:43 am #745773mosheroseMember“If you are confident with your relationship you dont need to convince others. “
If yur confidnet you dont have to convince yurself either.
do you think the gedolim write love notes to theyre wives? do you thnk any ben torah does?
Men adn women are not supposed to be romantick even with theyre wives. Ezra made a takana that men shouldnt be aitzel nishosayhem ktarnegolim and pirkey avos sez the same thing. Husbands and wives are partners not friends not boyfriend and girlfreind or even romantic partners. They are bulders of a bayis neeman something that has to be done with the utmost kedussha.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.