- This topic has 21 replies, 14 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 7 months ago by .
-
Posts
-
AP calls these Marathon bombers Chechen “Militants”.
The Lib media is at it again – Chechnian “Terrorists”, Not “militants”!
I was wondering why Putin offered the US help? – Now I know why – he must have had some Intel about the bombing either before or afterwards!
The Chechins hate the Russians, In fact about 10-15 years ago the russians almost destroyed Grodzny because of the rebellion of the Chechins
The bombers Uncle is very adamant that they are not from Chechnya.
Chechen mah bah l’rabos? Shemaleh kol ha’aretz dassam.
They are Ethnically Chenchen, but they were not from Chechniya. They were from nearby
They were borderline Chechnians and Dagestanis. Both are mostly Islamic places. Dagestan is still part of Russia, Chechnya a little bit less. (On Google Maps you’ll see Chechnya marked as a semi-separate part of Russia, while Dagestan is not). They were from Makhachkala, the capital of Dagestan.
Regarding Dagestan – search Wikipedia for “Shariat Jamaat”, says enough.
These guys however seemed to be acting on their own. If it’s true the older brother was there for 6 months last year that does sound a bit suspicious, but even then, I agree with the general consensus that it is highly unlikely that the Caucasian Islamist terrorist groups would want to target the USA intentionally. They have enough problems with the Russians – they don’t need another enemy.
Most likely these were just “lone wolf” terrorists, not affiliated with any group.
I could be wrong, though.
Why don’t we all wait a few days until the picture becomes clear. The family members are giving conflicting information.
They were Muslims and that’s all that counts. Religion of peace?? HA!
I’m waiting for one of the CR regulars to comment that the bombings in Boston were a response to Zionism!
Interesting. White, but Muslim. Unexpected.
Torah
There is such a thing as white Muslims. Many Bosnians are white (European) Muslims there are other countries as well that have white Muslims although they are certainly a small minority of the world’s Muslim population.
WIY: I know. They are a small minority, so it’s unexpected. 🙂
health: well your response to wolfman brings us really into bizarro world! But explain to me why ONLY things that are bad happen because of the evil zinsts but nothign good??
Rabbiofberlin, thank you for helping me out. It appears that we have prophets in our midst.
To reiterate my point: On many posts, Muslim aggression is excused away as a response to Zionism. We are being told that Muslims are really peaceful folk and it’s only because of those pesky Zionists that they do violent things.
It really wouldn’t be so far fetched to say that it was indirectly caused by Zionism. Arafat ym”s was the father of modern day terrorism.
Arafat was an thoroughly evil man. He used Zionism as an excuse just as Hitler used “lebensraum” as his excuse. By Hitler the real motivation was his war against the Jews. Ditto for Arafat. Hitlerian comparisons are generally unfair and inappropriate but most of us would agree that by Arafat it’s OK.
Regarding the father of modern day terrorism: Arafat is up there but depending on how you define terrorism, he may not be the first. Robespierre from the French Revolution probably qualifies as an early proponent.
Do a google search on The Muslim Brotherhood. This viciously anti-Semetic group was founded in 1928. Its founding principles do not seem to mention Zionism.
as Rav Shlomo Brevda z’tl stated:
“learning Torah- vadai
davening- vadai
reason why things happen- safek”
I believe it’s safe to say there are no neviim in the CR
I believe it’s safe to say there are no neviim in the CR
I dunno about that.
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.