Chabad Media Won

Home Forums Decaffeinated Coffee Chabad Media Won

Viewing 50 posts - 1,001 through 1,050 (of 1,091 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #2323524
    qwerty613
    Participant

    To Minuval

    Why would I or anyone have a problem with what Philosopher wrote? It’s part of Judaism 1.0.

    #2323526
    qwerty613
    Participant

    To Minuval

    Why would I or anyone have a problem with what Philosopher wrote? It’s Judaism 1.0.

    #2323587
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    Lubavitchers never discuss the Holocaust as per the Rebbe’s orders. I knew that and so one Shabbos I gave a speech focusing on the Shoah in order to annoy a certain Chabad Rabbi. As I anticipated he blew a gasket and announced,”The Holocaust is one of those times when G-d couldn’t explain himself. Like when the Romans were torturing Rabbi Akiva and the angels said Zeh Torah and Zeh it’s Schar? And Hashem couldn’t answer them.”

    So do Lubavitchers never discuss the Holocaust, or do they disagree with the reasons you gave for why the Holocaust happened? 🤔

    (Not that it makes much of a difference. After all, one who disagrees with Qwerty is disagreeing with G-d Hikiddos.

    P.S. It’s incredible that with all of Qwerty’s insane hate and rhetoric here for anyone who dares associate with Chabad in any which way, he is allowed to gives speeches in a Chabad shul!!!

    Qwerty, your Chabad Rabbis must be very, very kind and merciful toward you. I’m sure they use immense self control to treat you like a mensch. It’s incredible how chassidus can help someone master their middos.

    #2323661
    philosopher
    Participant

    Neville, do you know what Yiddishkeiteven is? Because if what I said regarding tzaddikim giving brochos is supposedly “checkmate/avodah zora” then you know less than an am haaretz.

    #2323675
    qwerty613
    Participant

    To Minuval

    I challenge you to find one post in which I said there’s something wrong with getting a Bracha from another Jew. Moreover going to Kivrei Tzaddikim is normative Judaism. Checkmate moron. May you join Benedict ARSo in the dustbins of YWN CR history. You traitors deserve each other.

    #2323904
    qwerty613
    Participant

    To the enemies of Hashem in this thread

    You try to blame the moderators. To borrow from the Bard, “The fault lies not in the moderators but in ourselves.”

    #2323860
    qwerty613
    Participant

    To the real Jews which includes the moderators

    Shlomo Hamelech wrote that a three-ply cord isn’t easily severed. Now that Philosopher, yankel berel and yours truly are working together the low lives of this thread are doomed. Mm ay Hashem eliminate idolatrous Chabad and replace it with a vibrant form that believes in Him as it was before you know who took over.

    #2323801

    “Why would I or anyone have a problem with what Philosopher wrote? It’s Judaism 1.0.”

    I am so psyched for Judaism 2.0 to come out.

    #2324054
    yankel berel
    Participant

    @philosopher
    A hiddush over yom Kippur :
    How did Jonah Hanavih survive for 3 days in the belly of the fish , without oxygen ?
    Even Ezrah says that this was a special miracle for Yonah , by HKBH that he survived for 3 days without oxygen.

    thus- not only is Yaakov Lo Met , but also Yonah hanavih is Lo Met ….

    #2324182
    qwerty613
    Participant

    To Philosopher

    The Minuval has no interest in Judaism, he just wants to act like a jerk. Ignore him and hopefully he’ll go away.

    To Menachem Shmei

    To your credit you don’t call me a liar. To your discredit you’re so determined to disprove whatever I say that you don’t take the time to discern the facts. From 2003-2009 I attended a YI which had a militantly Chabad Rabbi. It was from him that I learned most of what I’ve posted here(his son -in-law is the fellow who said that the Rebbe is greater than Moshe Rabbeinu). During those six years I gave a weekly Dvar Torah at Shalosh Seudas. One Shabbos I mentioned the Holocaust and this Rabbi interrupted the speech telling me that the Rebbe said this subject can’t be discussed. In July 2009 I made up my mind to leave the shul because of this Rabbi’s abuse and so I made my last speech about the Shoah knowing he’d go ballistic and he did. In the Chabad shul I attend I never express my views and I get along great with everyone. It’s called being a Mensch something you know very little about. Interesting tidbit. This Erev Yom Kippur I davened Mincha at the YI. After we finished the Rabbi asked me for Mechilah. Of course I gave it to him. You and the others want to portray me in the worst possible light. Unfortunately for you Hashem knows better. It’s only in a thread like this one where I can and do express my views on Chabad, views which are shared by my Rabbonim.

    #2324211
    philosopher
    Participant

    Yankel berel, obviously if Hashem created everything he can make miracles as well. I never said Hashem can’t make a miracle and Yaacov Avinu can’t be physically alive in his kever forever.

    1. I said that the Torah says that the brothers of Yosef saw that there father died. I said that Rashi is not contradicting a posuk in the Torah that says that Yaacov died. Rashi said Yaacov is alive forever which means that he is spiritually alive forever, he did not say Yaacov’s guf is alive forever.

    2. I said that being physically alive in a kever for 3,000 years is the worst punishment you can give someone. Yonah was PUNISHED by being trapped in the fish for 3 days. Can you imagine being physically alive in you kever forever? Do you want that for yourself? If you don’t want that for yourself then why would you think Yaacov Avinu wants that kind of horrible punishment?

    #2324213

    If Yonah were to lurk into this thread, he would surely demand everyone to do teshuva, whether they are in EY or in Ashur.

    #2324225
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    Interesting point, Yankel.

    I assume that Qwerty and Philosopher insist that all meforshim interpret the story of Yonah to be a משל, because Torah must be completely rational, G-d performs nothing above nature.

    #2324239
    qwerty613
    Participant

    To yankel berel

    I’d like to comment on your post even though you addressed it to Philosopher. Using the Avos paradigm there are four ways to interpret information, to know that it’s true to believe it, to accept it and finally to reject it. I would argue that we only know that which Hashem gave us as part of His natural law. So I know that one plus one is two efc. These are facts which are universally accepted. As for belief, I believe in Hashem and His Torah. To believe means that I can offer cogent proofs to their veracity. Then we’ll skip to rejecting. If one rejects aor changes, as the Rebbe did, any aspect of the Torah, Written or Oral, he’s a Kofer. But let’s discuss acceptance. I accept that Yishai lived until the age of 400 but I don’t believe it, therefore I won’t present arguments to validate that Chazal. At the same time I don’t reject it, so I recognize that at this juncture I can’t understand what it actually means. Similarly I’ll accept that Yonah survived for 3 days w/o oxygen but I don’t believe it. Of course if Hashem decided to perform a special miracle He’s certainly able to do so. This is my Shittah developed in conjunction with several great Rabbis. We reject the Rabbi Miller approach of, “Accept what I say or you have no Cheilek in Olam Habo.” If you or others would like to discuss this in a civilized manner I’m happy to do so.

    #2324441
    qwerty613
    Participant

    To yankel berel

    Could you provide the quote from Ezra? I doubt he used the word oxygen.

    #2324658
    qwerty613
    Participant

    To Menachem Shmei

    Again you twist what I and Philosopher are saying. My Shittah, and apparently it’s similar to that of Philosopher is that Hashem created a world which follows natural law. Therefore we try to minimize the occurrence of miracles which violate natural law. Obviously I agree that Hashem is capable of transcending natural law and so I would never reject such a possibility. Rather I try to explain things without resorting to such types of miracles. Let me, of course make it clear that I didn’t invent this approach. It’s in line with Rambam. That’s the Rabbi, whose work you Lubavitchers make a Siyum on yearly, but reject what he said about Moshiach. Total hypocrisy. I will also add that the Shittah of rationalism is in line with all my Rabbonim and so don’t accuse me of inventing my own religion as did your lying Kofer god.

    #2324665
    ARSo
    Participant

    philosopher: I said that being physically alive in a kever for 3,000 years is the worst punishment you can give someone… Can you imagine being physically alive in you kever forever?

    You’re making the wild assumption that for Yaakov Avinu to be alive in his kever would be ‘unpleasant’. I, on the other hand, assume that if Yaakov Avinu is alive in his kever, he does not find it unpleasant at all. If Hashem wants him to be alive why would Hashem not make it pleasant for him? Yonah, on the other hand, as you wrote, was being punished, so Hashem indeed made it unpleasant for him.

    #2324796
    yankel berel
    Participant

    @qwerty
    The Ibn Ezrah is in Jonah 2:1 as far as I remember. Although he doesn’t say it exactly the way I quoted him.
    Have a look at the Malbim, at Radak and Metsudot.
    Think it is the Malbim who clearly references the lack of air.


    @philosopher

    Think it was you who mentioned the issue of Jonah being in such pain [not be able the breathe] for such a long time , for 3 days ? [Same about Yaakov forever]
    Cf. Rashi and other commentaries who reference hazal who were medayek in the psukim that in the beginning he was inside a male fish, and Jonah did not see a need to pray, so the male fish spit him out and when he was inside the female fish , he was uncomfortable so he started praying.
    It couldn’t have been too uncomfortable inside the male fish , notwithstanding the lack of air.

    #2324797
    yankel berel
    Participant

    One of the differences between the Nevi’ei Haba’al and the Nevi’ei Emet, was the the real nevi’im were harsh towards klal yisrael, whereas the nevi’ei haba’al only complimented the yehudim.

    Habad is always and invariable complimentary towards am yisrael. According to them It’s never the yehudims fault.
    As opposed to their opponents- the litvishe and satmar.
    That explains much of the difference between mainstream yehudim and habad when it comes to the sensitive topic of the shoa.

    #2324811
    qwerty613
    Participant

    To Philosopher

    If you follow the wiles of Menachem Shmei he has two agendas. The first is to depict us as insane idiots. Obviously classic projection. But there’s another tack, more pervasive and insidious and that’s to make “crazy the new normal.” So why is this? Chazal teach that a person doesn’t sin unless he benefits from it. Clearly it’s in Shmei’s interest to promote insanity, but why? Chabad’s greatest enemy is Rambam because he represents normative Judaism and normalcy. As a rule he eschews the phantasmagoric. Obviously this is anathema for Chabad and so they have to discredit him while at the same time pretending to honor him. Let me give you a clear cut example. This past Pesach I attended the Seudas Moshiach at my Chabad Shul. The Rabbi spoke about that day’s Haftorah which says that the wolf will lie down with the lamb etc. He quoted Rambam who, of course, said it’s allegorical but then he said that Ramban says it’s literal and Chabad follows Ramban. Which leads us to ask, Why do they study Rambam? The answer is that they don’t study anything. Their Torah is simply finding quotes to prove their psychosis and so it’s a Toeivah, no different than what the original Christians did.

    #2324830
    qwerty613
    Participant

    To the group
    It’s time to end Shmei’s latest obfuscation attempt. Here’s a question for all, “There are two opinions regarding Iyov. One says he was an advisor to Pharoah and the other says he never existed. So who’s right?” Time is up. They’re both right. It’s called Eilu Veilu Divrei Elokim. Similarly we have in this thread the rational approach espoused by Philosopher and I, and the irrational tack favored by the serpent. Each is valid. I have a friend who’s a Chassidic Rabbi on the East Side. He constantly tells stories about Rebbe’s flying on magic carpets. Hey whatever floats your boat, but it’s not for me. The rational approach isn’t perfect. There’s much in the Torah that we can’t explain or understand but remember what Benedict ARSo wrote, “We don’t die from a question.” On the other hand the danger of blindly following the irrational is that a new religion called Chabadianity has emerged.

    #2324939
    qwerty613
    Participant

    To yankel berel

    Very well said. Another reason the Rebbe wouldn’t let his Chassidim mention the Shoah is that it leads to the obvious question, “If the Rebbe runs the world why didn’t he stop it?”

    To Philosopher

    We see that the Rebbe is greater than Yaakov Avinu. He’s able to leave his box on Mondays and Thursdays to get Shlishi at 770.

    #2324945
    philosopher
    Participant

    Yankel berel, so true regarding false prophets in klal Yisroel. The Lubavitche have “rabbis” like Manis Friedman denying gehinom and saying that we need to do good deeds because “God has needs and that why He created humans so that they should serve Him” not because if we sin we go to gehinim or will get punished in this world c”v. They deny that God needs to be feared and that we need to fear acting in a sinful manner.

    #2324946
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    He quoted Rambam who, of course, said it’s allegorical but then he said that Ramban says it’s literal and Chabad follows Ramban. Which leads us to ask, Why do they study Rambam?

    This again highlights Qwerty’s misunderstanding of normal study and dialogue, which seems to result in a limited grasp of how to approach learning Torah.

    Qwerty, it seems that, in your mind, every discussion becomes a litmus test: Are you with me or against me? If someone is on your “team,” you’ll support whatever they say. If they’re not, you’ll dismiss or challenge their points and try to “checkmate” them, as if an intellectual conversation is just a game of chess.

    But that’s not how real discussions work. One can agree on some things and disagree on others. You can find nuance in someone’s position and still respect their views despite some differences.

    How much more so in Torah study, which is rooted in truth and peace. It is entirely possible to hold the Rambam in great esteem, and to emphasize studying his works, even if one doesn’t follow his rulings in every instance.

    #2324956
    philosopher
    Participant

    Qwerty, there’s a saying “if someone doesn’t believe any stories of Chassidishe Rebbes they are a kiofer but if they believe every story to be true they are a fool”.

    Shmei and co. are going further than just using Torah sources to try “prove the validity of Chabadianity”. They twist meforshim to try to get them to seem that they support their interpretations so that they will “lend support to the credibility of Chabiadinity”.

    #2324962
    qwerty613
    Participant

    To yankel berel

    I’d like to add to what you wrote. According to the Rebbe it’s Assur to say that the six million were killed because of the breakdown of European Jewry. The Rebbe also cancelled the concept of Gehinnom for sinners. As far as he was concerned all Jews except for one are the same. Therefore Rav Moshe and Ed Koch are equal. The only exception, of course, is the Chabad Nasi. Guess who that would be? Shmei tries to keep the discussion focused on nonsense like Yaakov Lo Mes to avoid these truths from coming out. Every Yid is a Big Tzaddik is an outgrowth of the Rebbe’s heresy.

    #2324963

    “Neville, do you know what Yiddishkeiteven is? Because if what I said regarding tzaddikim giving brochos is supposedly “checkmate/avodah zora” then you know less than an am haaretz.”

    Lol, what? I was mocking qwerty with that comment. How was that even slightly unclear?

    My point was that you (as a certified non-Lubavitcher with qwerty stamp of approval) are allowed to say these things (as you should be). If a Lubavitcher said exactly the same words as you, qwerty would call that person an idolator. This is just a team sport for him; he has no cohesive ideology.

    #2325446
    ☕️coffee addict
    Participant

    Just decided to pop in to ask this question (not really following the flow anymore, but I see it’s still going)

    What’s up with the non leather shoes, and walking out backwards. I’ve been to countless kivrei tzaddikim (רשב״י, רמב״ם, ר מאיר בעל הנס etc) and I don’t think breslovers have that rule (I have friends that went for Rosh Hashanah)

    I understand the rule of אדמת קודש but isn’t this going a little TOO far?

    #2326005
    qwerty613
    Participant

    To Philosopher

    Manis Friedman is a Chabad Rabbi which means he’s a puppet of the Rebbe. No Chabad Rabbi will ever exercise his free will and announce that their religion is a set of lies. According to Chabad the Mitzvahs are optional and there are no consequences if someone rejects them. As we see from this thread Lubavitchers throw themselves on a sword to farenfer all the Rebbe’s heresies.

    #2326011
    qwerty613
    Participant

    To coffee addict

    It’s just another example of their deification of the Rebbe. Chabad has their own Ushpizin whom they honor rather than our traditional seven. They have nine . The Rebbe is number nine and they honor him on Simchas Torah. Since there’s no longer any inyan of Sukkah he’s free to travel all over the world.

    #2326013
    qwerty613
    Participant

    To Menachem Shmei

    Your last post was very well written. So why don’t you use your Torah erudition to explain why Chabad rejects Rambam ‘s criteria for Moshiach? Checkmate.

    #2326143

    phil: there’s a saying “if someone doesn’t believe any stories of Chassidishe Rebbes

    This is Rambam about Agadot. What Rambam thinks about stories of Chassidishe Rebbes is unknown to me.

    #2326239
    yankel berel
    Participant

    @qwerty
    Habad does not reject Rambam’s criteria for Mashiach.
    Not at all.
    At least until a certain day in 1994, that is.
    Until that day, habad was extremely busy trumpeting Rambam’s every word and how it corresponds oh so meticulously with their leader.
    So, notwithstanding Shmei’s erudition, after bakashat mehila, I don’t think he will be able to furnish you [and the rest of us] with a logical explanation why Rambam’s words stopped being relevant on that pivotal day in 1994 …

    #2326246
    qwerty613
    Participant

    To yankel berel

    Again you’re absolutely right. The thing with Chabad is that they have no concern for the truth. Moreover they take pride in lying so you can’t get them to concede to anything. We know that at 120 we have to answer to Hashem. They have a different mindset, if you catch my drift.

    #2326566
    ☕️coffee addict
    Participant

    Menachem (or any other Lubavitcher),

    I’m still waiting for a non qwerty answer

    #2326749
    qwerty613
    Participant

    To coffee addict

    Shmei is hiding in his bunker. He finally realizes that his cause is lost. He’s afraid of yankel berel because he knows he can’t attack him like he does to me and Philosopher.Baruch Hashem the real Jews have exposed the truth about Chabadianity.

    To Philosopher

    I’m glad you mentioned Manis Friedman. He has enough cache to speak the truth. The same for the Jacobson brothers. They know that the Rebbe spouted Kefirah but they won’t say anything. They’re very smart guys and they could spin it in a way that it almost sounds Kosher but they refuse.

    #2327264
    yankel berel
    Participant

    @menachem shmei
    Can we hear your take on the most recent topics brought up here ?
    Is this going to be a case of shtika kehoda’ah ?

    #2327762
    qwerty613
    Participant

    To yankel berel

    I like to be fair. Shmei is bright. He knows that he’s lost. Obviously he can’t admit it so he’s laying low hoping that some opening develops. He thought he could turn you against me and Philosopher. When that failed he disappeared. Moreover, the traitors who sided with him left the thread.

    To the real Jews

    Sue Fishkoff wrote a book called “The Rebbe’s Army” about 20 years ago. She interviewed prominent Lubavitchers male and female. Once she spoke to Rebbetzin Rivka Slonim who happens to be a fine person. She told Ms Fishkoff that when she was a little girl she went to sleep away camp and they taught her, “From 770 we are marching out.” She said the song made no sense to her because the Rebbe was totally spiritual. I understand how difficult it is for Chabad to face the truth about their leader but it’s very clear. When he was 3 years old he had a dream that he’ll rule the world and everything he did in his life was to make that Mishigas a reality.

    #2328803
    yankel berel
    Participant

    Habad silence is deafening ….
    This seems like a clear acknowledgement of defeat ….

    #2328961
    qwerty613
    Participant

    To yankel berel

    You’re obviously right. Let me share another story.More than a dozen years ago I attended the Jewish National Retreat. That’s Chabad’s annual Convention (it’s a story as to why I went). It ran Wednesday through Sunday. On Shabbos afternoon I attended a lecture but I don’t recall the “Rabbi”. He related the following, “There was a Yemenite boy, about 20 years old who wanted to become religious so he went to one of those heh, heh, heh Kiruv Yeshivas in Israel. The first day day he was there they told him that you get rewarded for every Mitzvah and punished for every sin. And when thep punish you they put you in hell and burn you with coals. The boy went through this abuse for a week and finally told the Rabbi to go to hell. Then he came to Chabad and he found love. And now he’s happy.” Obviously Aush Haftorah doesn’t use such an approach but it’s true that there’s reward and punishment. Chabad’s Rabbis laugh it off because Schneersohn told them that he eliminated Gehinnom.

    To Menachem Shmei

    I can’t speak for the others but AFAIC, if you admit that we’re right I’ll welcome you back to actual Judaism. You have my word no checkmates whatsoever.

    #2329040
    ARSo
    Participant

    yb, I doubt you’ll get them to ever acknowledge defeat.

    #2329132
    qwerty613
    Participant

    To ARSo

    So now you want to return to our side? Okay. I’ll “forget” what you did and welcome you back. Let me share something that Rabbi Dovid Hollander told me, “You can’t understand a Rosho, because you’re not a Rasha.” Chabad obviously will never admit defeat. I’ll give you a Moshol. Someone started a business and was introduced to an investment advisor. The fellow told him to put aside a small amount every month and trust him to invest it. They decided on $200 a month. It went very nicely. The businessman was making between 7 and 8 percent a month. After 20 years he had accumulated a small fortune, but the advisor told him not to take anything out until he retired or he’ll get killed with the taxes. Of course he agreed. One day an emergency arose and he needed to tap into the fund. You can guess the rest. He had been scammed from the start. Do you know how hard it is to deal with that. Shmei’s bright. He knows his religion is a lie but he can’t deal with it so he looks to convince people like you to join with him in his fantasy. And he pulled it off. I saw what he was trying and I warned you not to fall for it but you accepted his blandishments. He tried to do the same to yankel berel but it didn’t work.

    #2329180

    qwerty > but it’s true that there’s reward and punishment.

    so, what is your reading of this story where some incompetent people almost lost this boy who came on their own and Chabad was able to help him? Make fun that you think their philosophy was not up to your standards? R Dessler writes that every person is trying to ascend up the “sulam Yaakov”; people differ at where they are; and also what tools they have; and those who do not have appropriate tools would use any tool they can find. Same applies to those who are trying to help. If someone saves you form drowning – would you sue them for hurting you during CPR?

    #2329265
    philosopher
    Participant

    Qwerty, people get intimidated when someone sounds like he knows what he’s saying despite the person who appears knowledgeable is clearly contradicting the Torah, our chachamim and mesorah and despite their ideology being incredibly dumb (… the rebbe running the world and being alive after he died, etc…) . But when lies are repeated as facts over and over again and they “use sources” to make it seem as if meforshim support their kefira, after a while it doesn’t sound like nonsense anymore.

    And that is the danger of Chabadianity, their seemingly innocent movement that is accepted by Chareidim despite their ideology being total a”z.

    #2329266
    yankel berel
    Participant

    @Arso
    I wasn’t asking them to acknowledge defeat.
    I was pointing out the klal of Shtika Kahoda’ah.
    Which means that their silence is an acknowledgement of defeat, even without anyone saying anything.
    They have full opportunity to answer. They choose not to.
    That in itself is an acknowledgement.

    #2329405
    qwerty613
    Participant

    To always

    That story was clearly a lie. Chabad loves taking shots at Aish Hatorah whenever possible. Is it true that Chabad does good,? Definitely and I encourage them but until they drop the deification of the Rebbe we must fight them.

    To Philosopher
    Most Chareidim associate Judaism with rituals, a nice esrog, fancy shtreimels so they won’t even listen when the subject of theology comes up.

    #2329410
    philosopher
    Participant

    Always ask, the moral of the story is that Yiddishkeit doesn’t change for anyone and gehenim is a fact for those who sin and don’t do teshuva, regardless if Chabad denies this basic tenet of Yiddishkeit.

    #2329463
    qwerty613
    Participant

    To the moderators

    You did a wonderful job allowing the truth to win out. Yasher koach.

    #2329652
    qwerty613
    Participant

    To Philosopher

    Yes we’ve eliminated Chabad in this thread but our work is only beginning. You see that always isn’t impressed. He favors the Chabad lies. The Minuval is hiding in Shmei’s bunker. ARSo certainly can’t be trusted. For those who believe in Hashem there are no questions, but many if not most Frum Jews should be considered Orthodox atheists. Their actions belie their belief in Hashem.

    #2329709
    ARSo
    Participant

    yb, the klal of shtika kehoda’s doesn’t apply in cases when the person who remains quiet does so because he knows that he won’t be able to convince others of his view. So if a Lubavicher is quiet in the fact of criticism, it doesn’t mean he agrees with it.

Viewing 50 posts - 1,001 through 1,050 (of 1,091 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.