Home › Forums › Web & Social Media – Latest Online Tips & Tools › BT wants to raise children without internet access…
- This topic has 94 replies, 21 voices, and was last updated 9 years, 10 months ago by ☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲.
-
AuthorPosts
-
December 25, 2014 8:08 pm at 8:08 pm #1049875NeutiquamErroParticipant
Zahavasdad, I sincerely hope that was a poor joke. I myself was bought up in an internet free home, and if I needed to do work or anything I was able to access it elsewhere in a controlled environment, such as when I did my research for exams in school, or when I did my shopping in the the community centre. Currently, I am computer literate, qualified and supremely able to deal with the outside world, and hold down a job. If you would like me to go into detail I would be glad to, but I can think of no way the internet would have made me any more worldly, learned or employable. It would have simply done what it has done to too many people I know, and damage them. It may not, but the risk enormous.
And flatbusher, to quote John McEnro, you cannot be serious. The internet is not a gift, it’s a test. It may be useful and often necessary evil, but a world without it would be an infinitely better one.
Remember, we are not talking about adults here, or even older teens. We are talking about children, as outlined in the thread title. And allowing them any kind of access is simply asking for trouble. And so, allow me to phrase the question thus. Should a child (define that how you wish) have regular internet access in the house? To which the answer is unequivocally a firm no.
December 25, 2014 8:25 pm at 8:25 pm #1049876MurphysLawMemberGood luck with it, they will get online somehow or-rather.
Safer they do it with your permission on a filtered PC then on a unfiltered device.
December 25, 2014 8:33 pm at 8:33 pm #1049877nishtdayngesheftParticipantZD,
Which seforim did you find only on Hebrew Books lately?
Rebyidd,
There are many things that are part of and necessary to life that are not necessary to expose children to when they are children. Your extrapolation is illogical.
December 25, 2014 8:39 pm at 8:39 pm #1049878nishtdayngesheftParticipantFlatbusher,
That argument is specious. There are many things that exist and were discovered that are inappropriate for children.
IE, children cannot operate a car.
And many, many more
December 25, 2014 8:50 pm at 8:50 pm #1049879👑RebYidd23Participant“Children” means people to whom you are a parent.
December 25, 2014 8:50 pm at 8:50 pm #1049880VogueMemberI have personally noticed that people who grow up with it often feel so dependent on it that when they are with other people, their interpersonal skills are pretty much non-existent.
For me, I found growing up that having regular internet access was something that I used to an extreme in terms of time consumption. The reason for this is because I wanted to know about life outside of the bubble I have been raised in and was seeking a way to break out of it. I came across frumkite in the process. That being said however, I think that in the real world, its more important that children have social skills and computer literacy without knowing about the internet (but then when they start working, I can show them how to use email), than to just let them have it and hope they will use it responsibly. The internet is a powerful tool that can stir up a lot of emotions and unneeded time spent looking at a screen.
Our parents and grandparents for the most part if we are of age to be commenting on this forum (over 10 years old), were probably not really raised with internet access themselves. They came out okay in the process as well.
December 25, 2014 8:53 pm at 8:53 pm #1049881👑RebYidd23ParticipantAnd what extrapolation? That was me making fun. (Also, i.e. is not e.g.)
December 25, 2014 9:49 pm at 9:49 pm #1049882NeutiquamErroParticipantnishtdayngesheft:
Finally, somebody who can see sense. This entire debate has been typified by every reasoned point against the fallacy of having home internet counteracted by the exact one line, badly thought out non-arguments that are calculated to assuage ones conscience. for example, it’s necessary for work (so have it in your office), it’s necessary for learning (arguable, and that can definitely be done outside the home, such as in school or in a community centre), they’ll get online some other way (not true for the vast majority of kids, especially if allowed to use it in a controlled environment outside the home), and so on and so forth. If anybody can provide a reasoned, sensible case for having internet in the home and allowing your children to access it, please provide one, because all that has been until now have been, and I’ll say it again, mindless self-justifications.
December 25, 2014 9:52 pm at 9:52 pm #1049883zahavasdadParticipantEvery Godol has said, repeatedly and forcefully, that there is no heter to have it in the home, and that includes for learning. So yes, by following daas Torah, I know what Hashem wants from a person.
I think we can agree the people who run sites like torahanytime , yutorah , sawyouatsinai , shabbat etc are frum people and are doing mitzvoh with their websites
December 25, 2014 9:53 pm at 9:53 pm #1049884zahavasdadParticipantAnd Maybe just maybe Hashem gets alot of Nachass from all the yidden who are able to learn torah and hear shiurim they would not otherwise be able to do. Have you considered that possibility?
December 25, 2014 10:01 pm at 10:01 pm #1049886NeutiquamErroParticipantAnd now to deal with the latest extrapalation…
“Children” means people to whom you are a parent.
The title of the thread refers to ‘raising’ children. Above a certain age you can no longer be considered to be raising a child, whilst you may still be a a parent to them and still ‘parent’ them. I can only repeat what Vogue has said multiple times. A child does not need the internet in any incarnation as they grow up, and therefore, knowing as we do all the attendant dangers, having it in the house and/or allowing them free access (free as in unfettered, not as in unfiltered), from as frum standpoint, can only be seen as wilful child neglect, if not abuse.
And whilst you claim to be ‘only making fun’, Reb Yid, I don’t mean to insult your sense of humour, it does come across as what nisht says it was – extrapolation.
December 25, 2014 10:23 pm at 10:23 pm #1049887NeutiquamErroParticipantAnd maybe just maybe Hashem gets a lot of Nachass from all the yidden who are able to learn Torah and hear shiurim they would not otherwise be able to do. Have you considered that possibility?
I’m sure Hashem does get nachas from, and I quote, people who would not otherwise be able to learning from online sites. So if someone will be online anyway it is a mitzva for them to learn, and for others to enable them to do so. But for a frum yid (and the last time I checked, this was the Yeshiva World News, not Aish.com), who has plenty of resources, and for whom the internet is not necessary to learn, using these sites as a justification (there’s that word again) for having internet at home is ridiculous. It’s one thing if a responsible adult looks at these sites whilst working in an office, but the image of a grown, frum man bringing a laptop into the home, endangering himselff and of course his family, because he ‘wants it for learning’ is not only stupid, but against daas Torah.
Are you genuinely trying to be cleverer or more righteous than Reb Chaim Kannievsky, Reb Elyashiv or any other of the numerous Gedolim who have unequivocally banned domestic internet use?
December 25, 2014 10:37 pm at 10:37 pm #1049889zahavasdadParticipantI am also sure Hashem also gets alot of Nachass from all the Chachnasat Orchim from Shabbat and the Shidduchem from sawyouatsinai
December 25, 2014 10:53 pm at 10:53 pm #1049890NeutiquamErroParticipantHashem wants you to listen to daas Torah. Daas Torah says you shouldn’t have the internet in your house, and certainly not for your children. You can’t just think you knew better, that you’re cleverer than them. Do you?
December 25, 2014 11:40 pm at 11:40 pm #1049891VogueMemberShabbat.com is a website that was created as an avenue for bringing Jews into Yiddishkite in the form of setting people up for shabbos hospitality anywhere around the word. Saw You At Sinai has endorsement of many rabbonim including chareidi rabbonim who have connections to gedolim. If you are in shidduchim, you should theoretically be old enough to understand the dangers and responsibility that one has when using the internet (such as online safety). Saw you at sinai is a tool that people pay for that allows them to work with two shadchanim who search for you and redt something if they think it is appropriate. That particular website, in my opinion is much more appropriate than websites like jwed and harei at which have no shadchan/ person to screen people on the website.
December 26, 2014 2:57 pm at 2:57 pm #1049892flatbusherParticipantEverything can be viewed either as a test or a gift. Someone asked a well-known rav (and I was present) about whether one is permitted to eat kosher food that is made to resembler non-kosher. The rav responded that if Hashem gave the chochmah to create, who are we to deny using it. Each person has to known for himself what is a test, but I don’t know how one can generalize with the Internet. There are people who just cannot control themselves when it comes to the Internet, or alcohol, or gambling. For those of us who do not have the taiveh, are these tests? Same with Internet with kids. You raise them and guide them how to responsible, maybe they can use it without the dangers.
December 26, 2014 3:26 pm at 3:26 pm #1049894lesschumrasParticipantNeut, ” Daas Torah ” is not monolithic.
December 26, 2014 4:28 pm at 4:28 pm #1049895flatbusherParticipantNeut, when the rabbonim called for the ban, I suspect it was based on what people told them rather than first-hand experience.
December 26, 2014 6:42 pm at 6:42 pm #1049896Letakein GirlParticipantFlatbusher,
Oh come ON!!! You can’t be serious. I am not eloquent like Vogue and Neutiquam, so I will leave it to them to refute your argument. I just want to say that you are not being realistic.
December 26, 2014 7:34 pm at 7:34 pm #1049897flatbusherParticipantWhat is not realistic is to believe that you can ban the Internet when so many people make their parnassa from it. It is often said it is easier to assur something than to understand why some is allowed. The fact that you are here, as well as all the others who post, just proves that you are ignoring the ban on the Internet anyway, so why be so self-righteous about it? Why does Yeshiva World even exist if we’re not supposed to have the Internet? Why do so many other frum websites exist if someone out there didn’t believe that the Internet is a vehicle for good. I am sick and tired of the folks who claim to be following daas Torah and then end up posting here.
December 27, 2014 6:21 pm at 6:21 pm #1049898NeutiquamErroParticipantI make my living from the internet
Zahavasdad, 2014
When the rabbonim called for the ban, I suspect it was based on what people told them rather than first-hand experience.
flatbusher, 2014
I know the openings of the filters
Rebyidd23, 2014
Your being against internet in the home is a justification for raising children who will never know how to live in the real world.
Rebyidd23, 2014
It is often said it is easier to assur something than to understand why some is allowed.
flatbusher, 2014
My parents let me do wtvr I want and don’t care, I have to set my own bounderies. It’s hard…
shopping613, 2014
Internet usage should by all means be
avoided in homes… In any event, children should
not be given internet access.
Reb Aaron Moshe Shechter, Reb Aharan Feldman, Reb Avrohom Chaim Levin, Reb Aryeh Malkiel Kotler, Reb Dovid Feinstein, Reb Shmuel Kammenetsky, 2011
December 27, 2014 6:28 pm at 6:28 pm #1049899NeutiquamErroParticipantWhat is not realistic is to believe that you can ban the Internet when so many people make their parnassa from it.
This discussion is not about banning the internet, it’s about raising kids with access. Adult usage, in whatever environment, is a debate for another day.
December 28, 2014 12:08 am at 12:08 am #1049900flatbusherParticipantNeut, and what do you suppose happens when the kids leave the house and find the Internet elsewhere? Don’t you think it is wiser to educate them on it and how to use it responsibly? I think it is mistake to think you can shield children from the world, because when they get out there and don’t know what they’re facing, the outcome could be even worse. I am not saying you need to expose them to all this, but at least educate them before they find out things for themselves.
December 28, 2014 12:09 am at 12:09 am #1049901flatbusherParticipantBTW, Neut, if you follow DaasTorah, how are you participating in this discussion?
December 28, 2014 2:51 am at 2:51 am #1049902JosephParticipantShould parents show their kids TV, too, “to educate them on it and how to use it responsibly” since “I think it is mistake to think you can shield children from the world, because when they get out there and don’t know what they’re facing, the outcome could be even worse”?
December 28, 2014 3:18 am at 3:18 am #1049903☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantBTW, Neut, if you follow DaasTorah, how are you participating in this discussion?
The roshei yeshiva he mentioned, AFAIK, do not asser internet in total, or adult use of a moderated forum such as this one.
Should parents show their kids TV, too
Not a great analogy, since TV’s primary function is entertainment, and the content is rarely acceptable. I don’t really see a way to eduducate in its proper use.
Internet, though, has a very practical use, and I can understand the argument for education in how to make sure to use it properly.
I still think that young children should not have free access to internet, and that an internet free home is ideal, if not always feasible.
December 28, 2014 3:26 am at 3:26 am #1049904NeutiquamErroParticipantDaasYochid and Lior have pretty much said it all in terms of my planned response, but…
I specifically said earlier that this debate is about home usage for children, but immediately somebody replies by asking about me. If it helps, I’m not twelve, at least not the last time I checked. Whether it is right for an adult to regularly go online for nonbusiness purposes is another question, for another time (feel free to start another thread about it). Remember that here we are talking about children. And younger children cannot choose how they run their life, or moderate their usage or access. The parent essentially makes the choice for them. And when the life at risk is not your own, but another, vulnerable, one that is dependent on you to guide it and protect it, the entire issue becomes far more serious.
Next, not a single reply is made to mine, and others’, reference to the fact that Rabbonim have unequivocally ossured children having access to the internet, certainly on a regular basis. The only posts that even refer to them obliquely, appear to border on kefirah, and I do not say that lightly.
And lastly, as usual, most of the justifications for home internet are based on the premise that children must be educated on ‘the ways of the world’ or, through some rather twisted logic, that having online access would in some way protect them. Now, whilst I wish to be very careful to avoid insulting anybody (I have been warned that some of my posts have been too harsh), I personally find it hard to accept that this is the true reason one might wish to have it in the house. As I believe I have mentioned, I cannot see how the internet is absolutely necessary to educate children in these matters. My parents managed it, despite not having any home internet access (and, yes, it would have been useful in business terms). Children can be educated in a myriad ways without the web, and furthermore, if a parent does not feel they can inpart the correct values in their child without the aid of the internet, perhaps they should first look inward.
December 28, 2014 4:10 am at 4:10 am #1049905NeutiquamErroParticipantThere is a difference between protecting children from the negative aspects of the outside world, of which I can safely say are all available on the internet in some way or other, and neglecting to educate them at all on those matters, leaving them open to those same dangers. The internet is not the prevention, it’s the disease. There is not a single way in which it is needed for a child, and a million ways in which it is not. So the question is, from my point of view, not what’s wrong with it (which I assume and hope we all agree on), but what’s right with it.
December 28, 2014 4:11 am at 4:11 am #1049906VogueMemberI agree that it is a mistake to think you can shield children from the world as well. Even if my children (when I have them) are unable to access the internet, they will for sure be aware of it’s existence. I am not naive either. But personally, I know that even as an adult, I have lost sleep because I have checked my email at weird hours or got sucked into a chat conversation at one am. Children need to sleep and spend time with people in person. By the time they are adults, they should already have developed these interpersonal skills to the point where even if they have internet themselves, they should be disciplined enough to know that they need to put their own devices away when they go to bed. Keep them off and stuff. Its kind of like how when I was a kid, I got flashlights taken away from me because I would read a book under the blankets late at night. I can control what books my children read to a much larger degree than what they choose to view online.
December 28, 2014 4:21 am at 4:21 am #1049907NeutiquamErroParticipantflatbusher:
Just read the title. It says ‘raising’ children. So simply assertion at what age you would consider a child to be being ‘raised’, and assume we are talking about that.
As for your next two issues, they have both been dealt with earlier in the thread.
(I have chosen to disregard your query about rabbonim, as you are generalizing, thereby conveniently ignoring the real issue, which, as mentioned above, is children, and therefore entirely practical as regards their usage)
December 28, 2014 4:22 am at 4:22 am #1049908NeutiquamErroParticipantIncidentally, what is going on with the order of the post?
December 28, 2014 4:27 am at 4:27 am #1049909JosephParticipantNot a great analogy, since TV’s primary function is entertainment, and the content is rarely acceptable. I don’t really see a way to eduducate in its proper use.
Internet, though, has a very practical use, and I can understand the argument for education in how to make sure to use it properly.
You have PBS and other educational television for children.
December 28, 2014 4:31 am at 4:31 am #1049910flatbusherParticipantBut there are rabbonim who asser it in all situationss, which is not at all practical. How many people go online for education courses to avoid mixing with goyim in a school setting? So, is it better for them to go to the classroom? The person who started this thread did not indicate the age of the children, as a far as I can tell, but if he is talking about really young ones, then what’s the question? And for older ones, there are various filters one can install to block content.
December 28, 2014 4:36 am at 4:36 am #1049911☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantLior: That’s a small minority, and I distrust PBS to impart correct values. Don’t you?
December 28, 2014 4:41 am at 4:41 am #1049912JosephParticipantOf course. But I am defending my comparison of TV to the internet, for the purposes of this discussion. Many folks, including here I believe, would defend PBS as being educational.
Only a small proportion of the internet, too, is worthy of being used by Jewish families.
December 28, 2014 4:44 am at 4:44 am #1049913☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantBut there are rabbonim who asser it in all situationss
Do you see what you just did? You’re trying to tell us which rabbonim we should follow, so that when we follow others, you can accuse us of not following daas Torah. Pretty outrageous.
December 28, 2014 4:53 am at 4:53 am #1049914☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantLior, proportion is not the issue. There’s a lot more appropriate, even beneficial content, available on the internet than on TV.
In some ways, internet is worse than TV, and in some ways, TV is worse than internet, but a direct analogy is doomed to fail
December 28, 2014 4:58 am at 4:58 am #1049915☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantIncidentally, what is going on with the order of the post?
They’re being switched.
December 28, 2014 5:09 am at 5:09 am #1049916VogueMemberPBS may be educational, but many of its programs may not be suitable for young children.
If you do not have internet in your home and are taking online courses, you can complete the online portions in places such as libraries/bookstores/ coffee shops/ restaurants. Many places have free wi-fi for their customers who choose to do these thing, also the textbook portions can be read in one’s own home.
I am talking about all children under the age of 18/ who have not graduated high school yet.
DaasYochid: Many rabbonim have also acknowledged that even though it is the ideal to not have internet in one’s home and for children to not have access to it, that the reality is that for many people that it is not practical. This includes a few prominent rabbonim. That does not mean that we should not aspire to do what we can to protect ourselves. Even if that means just getting Norton on our computers to simply just block adult and gambling websites and allow ourselves to access anything else- Norton internet filter is free of charge.
edited
December 28, 2014 5:17 am at 5:17 am #1049917NeutiquamErroParticipantWhen I next look at the thread in a few hours, can there please be some concrete, i.e. specific, reasons why home internet is necessary for younger children, by which I mean actual site names, processes, etc. that cannot be done in another manner or in a secure envirinment such as a community centre, and that are important enough to justify the risks. Thank you.
December 28, 2014 5:19 am at 5:19 am #1049918☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantI would be surprised if any prominent rabbonim would approve of young children having access without direct supervision.
December 28, 2014 5:20 am at 5:20 am #1049919NeutiquamErroParticipantSome of my responses were misposted above the posts they were responding to, in case anybody was wondering.
December 28, 2014 5:24 am at 5:24 am #1049921NeutiquamErroParticipantIronically, the maan deomar I find myself agreeing most with is a DaasYochid.
December 28, 2014 5:28 am at 5:28 am #1049922VogueMemberI grew up in a home that was not frum. I did not use the internet for the first time until I was nine years old in a computer lab. We were learning how to use google to search things. I did not use the internet again until I was ten- a bit over a year later.
December 28, 2014 5:29 am at 5:29 am #1049923☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantRegarding the order of the posts:
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/-1-years
If you notice within the 25-minute editing limit, you can edit
a note into any such post – click on EDIT underneath them.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.