Home › Forums › Shidduchim › Broken Engagements
- This topic has 339 replies, 44 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 9 months ago by KovodHabriyos.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 11, 2010 7:38 am at 7:38 am #919235hereorthereMember
SJSinNYC
Member
Hereorthere, clearly a career minded woman needs to marry someone who agrees with that philosophy. But you specified For example Feminism is infiltrating the Jewish communitry and often unless the man is going to push the women into becomming a doctor or lawyer or business executive or some other “high powered” career some of them think these days that he will “think of her only as an object”
I’ve never heard of a man PUSHING the woman into a high powered position. “
When he is telling and encouraging her to think of her career as more important then anything else that is pushing, and like I said, I never heard of a feminist who would marry a man, who would NOT do that.
June 11, 2010 7:42 am at 7:42 am #919236hereorthereMemberWolfishmusings posted ;;;;;;;”In the end, she did both. When the kids were younger, she was a SAHM. Now that my kids are all teens and don’t need the full-time attention as much, she’s pursuing a career.”;;;;;;
This is a topic for the feminism thread, so I will answer it there.
June 11, 2010 12:51 pm at 12:51 pm #919237arosemParticipantI was drawn to this topic because a friend of a friend of mine recently got divorced within just a year of getting married. The tragedy shocked me. I am not sure how long they dated for or even if they met through a shiduch, and personally, I do not think that is all that relevant. I think it is silly for us all to sit back and guess which type of community is more at fault for a rise in the number of broken engagements. The facts are young couples are breaking engagements and marriages more frequently than ever before.
I was the first of my circle of friends to get married. My husband’s parents and my parents grew up as neighbors, so in a sense we go way back. But now I am seeing all my friends navigate through the stressful world of shiduchim. They often explain that they feel lost and confused.
In my opinion the real problem is that young people nowadays have had more influence from the outside world. That is not to make a specific charge against feminism. Smaller influences, like the way in which we approach a topic like a relationship is altered because of the modern world. Young people then are in almost a unique situation in which they are trying to stick to a torah approach while subconsciously having to struggle with modernity as well. What we really need to do is education people dating and getting ready to get married, not necessarily through pre-marital therapy, but simply to let them know what they are getting themselves into. Marriages are never simply a happy ending; they take work and effort.
I know that I felt, when I was younger, that marriage meant everything was perfect. Before I married my husband, we met with his Rabbi from his yeshiva in Israel. The Rabbi gave us the greatest piece of advice I had ever received. He told us that we must remember arguments happen and it is the way in which they happen that we can use to work in our favor to better our relationship. I think messages like this are what young people need to hear. We need to let people know that its more than just having the same opinions, goals and hopes for the future. They need to know how to communicate.
June 11, 2010 1:39 pm at 1:39 pm #919238PosterMemberarosem, When you speak about “outside influences”, try to understand where these influences come from. In the “Chasidishe” world (where u have minimal dating), girls do not read non jewish books, have access to a TV, go to movies or read the NY Times. So while they are exposed to outside influences to an extent, their exposure is to a much a lesser degree, therefore there is a slimmer chance of getting “burnt”.
June 11, 2010 2:23 pm at 2:23 pm #919239WolfishMusingsParticipanthis is a topic for the feminism thread, so I will answer it there.
It really has nothing to do with feminism (your assertions beside the point), but I responded there anyway.
The Wolf
June 11, 2010 3:34 pm at 3:34 pm #919240arosemParticipantQuoting Poster, “In the “Chasidishe” world (where u have minimal dating), girls do not read non jewish books, have access to a TV, go to movies or read the NY Times. So while they are exposed to outside influences to an extent, their exposure is to a much a lesser degree, therefore there is a slimmer chance of getting “burnt”.”
I think you are totally missing my point! We have to stop saying my way is better than yours and start giving young people the tools they need for a successful relationship. Even if there is less outside influences and slimmer chances of getting burnt, as you say, they are still there! Their mere presense is something that every circle of Judiasm must address.
June 11, 2010 3:42 pm at 3:42 pm #919241WolfishMusingsParticipantI’m not convinced that having access to TV, reading books, etc. = a greater chance of having a marriage end before the first anniversary.
Or am I misunderstanding the assumption behind the point that was being made?
The Wolf
June 11, 2010 5:00 pm at 5:00 pm #919242SJSinNYCMemberFrom what I understand, divorce is a great stigma in the chassidish world than in the rest of Judaism. So people are more likely to stay in bad marriages.
June 11, 2010 5:01 pm at 5:01 pm #919243SJSinNYCMemberWhen he is telling and encouraging her to think of her career as more important then anything else that is pushing, and like I said, I never heard of a feminist who would marry a man, who would NOT do that.
That’s not pushing. That’s a woman saying “I want to do XYZ” and her husband supporting it.
Pushing would be a man saying to his wife “I want you to go through medical school” even if she doesn’t want to.
June 11, 2010 5:07 pm at 5:07 pm #919244KashaMemberFrom what I understand, divorce is a great stigma in the chassidish world than in the rest of Judaism. So people are more likely to stay in bad marriages.
There is no basis in reality for this assumption. You are assuming a baseless reason without any data, to fulfil you’re assumptions.
More importantly, there SHOULD be a stigma for divorce. Divorce as is, is done way too much and way too rapidly without giving the marriage a chance or a chance to fix there underlying problems. (Sure there are some exceptions.) If divorce didn’t have a stigma, you would have even more of them. Thank G-d there is a great stigma against divorce, otherwise divorce would be just like another trip to the grocery.
June 11, 2010 5:11 pm at 5:11 pm #919245SJSinNYCMemberKasha, that’s what I got from talking to chassidish women.
Divorce is a stigma across all of Orthodox Judaism, but more so in the chassidish world.
June 11, 2010 5:13 pm at 5:13 pm #919246KashaMemberLike I said, we need to discourage divorce and encourage working out differences in marriage. Divorce should be an absolute last resort to be avoided at almost all costs. We have too many idiots in the community trying to push divorce, to C”V “catch-up” with secular society. B”H for the stigma and whatever other reasons that keep marriages intact, and children with 2 parent household. Divorce should be a dirty word in a Jewish home.
June 11, 2010 5:23 pm at 5:23 pm #919247SJSinNYCMemberKasha, divorce shouldn’t be a dirty word at all. There are plenty of marriages that should disolve including:
1) Physical/emotional Abuse
2) Cheating
3) Lying before marriage
4) Drug and alcohol abuse
And probably plenty more. We should support people who get divorced not make it a dirty word.
What we should do is start looking at WHY people are getting divorced and start heading off the issues before marriage.
For example, hiding bi-polar from your fiance is WRONG. Your fiance needs to enter marriage (and even engagementship) knowing this crucial fact.
June 11, 2010 5:25 pm at 5:25 pm #919248KashaMemberMost of those issues CAN AND SHOULD be resolved within a marriage.
Jews should not be promoting secular-style free-divorce.
Divorce is a 4-letter word in a Jewish household.
June 11, 2010 5:38 pm at 5:38 pm #919249WolfishMusingsParticipantMost of those issues CAN AND SHOULD be resolved within a marriage.
I’m curious… of the four that SJS mentioned, which do you think should be resolved within a marriage (and which, if any, do you think are legitimate grounds for divorce)?
The Wolf
June 11, 2010 5:41 pm at 5:41 pm #919250KashaMemberOne of them (if it occurred by the wife) are grounds for a mandatory divorce. Anything else, while obviously situation dependent, but can generally be worked out within a marriage without Chas V’Shalom going through a divorce.
June 11, 2010 5:45 pm at 5:45 pm #919251WolfishMusingsParticipantKasha,
So, you would advise a physically abused wife to try to “work it out” with her husband?
The Wolf
June 11, 2010 5:46 pm at 5:46 pm #919252KashaMemberYou’re asking a hypothetical, not an actual situation. (i.e. She was once pushed for the first and last time after 25 years of marriage of a loving marriage; [And make no mistake, unfortunately there are some reshoyim — outside of the marriage i.e. corrupt counselor/therapists — even within the community who will push for divorce]; there are so many possible variables and possibilities.)
Yes, it is possible to work it out in many, probably most, situations.
June 11, 2010 5:52 pm at 5:52 pm #919253WolfishMusingsParticipantYou’re asking a hypothetical, not an actual situation.
That’s true.
(i.e. She was once pushed for the first and last time after 25 years of marriage of a loving marriage
That’s not the type of case that I was referring to… and you know it. I was referring to a case where a woman in punched/hit/kicked on a regular basis by her husband. That’s usually what people mean when they talk about physical abuse in marriage — not an isolated incident 25 years earlier.
The Wolf
June 11, 2010 5:54 pm at 5:54 pm #919254SJSinNYCMemberPhysical/emotional abuse should be worked through? Often it can’t.
Substance abuse – a friend of mine was in a marriage where her husband was addicted to painkillers. After a year of therapy, she realized his life wasn’t going to change. He was on and off his meds througout that year, trying and ultimately telling her he couldn’t give up drugs for her. That should be worked through?
Lying about anything major in my book is AUTOMATIC ground for divorce in my humble opinion. You take away peoples options when you lie. People have a right to make decisions based on facts, not based on what you want others to percieve. Marriage is not a garment to be tried on and discarded. But you need a foundation of trust and honesty to have a good marriage.
And when people do get divorced, we should support them. There is no need to treat others poorly because you disagree with thier (halachically valid) divorce. We aren’t Catholic.
June 11, 2010 5:54 pm at 5:54 pm #919255KashaMemberThat’s why I said there are too many variables. BTW, I meant it occurred after 25 years, not in the beginning, but this is almost irrelevant.
Lying about marriage is terrible wrong, but certainly — generally — NOT grounds for divorce by a long-shot. This is what I mean by people purveying divorce as another trip to the grocery.
In any event, in the majority of divorce cases, things could have been worked out. What’s even sadder, is that these people — in most cases — are even sadder after divorce. And what’s even more, often their remarriage will be no happier than their first marriage that they broke up; and it often will include a whole bunch of baggage of its own.
June 11, 2010 5:57 pm at 5:57 pm #919257kapustaParticipantPractically, I dont think its possible to work out a marriage in a case of abuse (physical or emotional) c’v. Usually what would happen in such a case, the “offender” will have the upper hand and the other partner will be walking on eggshells.
Divorce is a 4-letter word in a Jewish household
Yes, it should be. In a case where the wife feels her husband is not helping out enough at home or not paying enough attention to what she wants or something along those lines, divorce is definitely a four-letter word. Today, there is an attitude that if its not perfect right away, thats it.
June 11, 2010 6:08 pm at 6:08 pm #919259happy123MemberAfter being an observer of the coffee room for a while, i had to respond to this topic. As someone who can testify that divorce IS the correct thing to do in certain situations, i have been there and done that.
Kasha- how can you say divorce is a dirty word? yes in this day and age, in the unfortunate society we live in there are many many issues that many spouses may have that are not known prior to the marriage, and the only option is to go out. As someone who put in over a year in a marriage to attempt to do everything i can to make it work, it did not help. Do i feel bad that i put in all that time, no. this way i can honestly give you my opinion now, that i have attempted to keep my marriage, and put in all efforts possible with much help and guidance and it was not ment to be. I am very happy now, being out of that marriage for over a year and i am a perfectly normal healthy girl, and if the world looks at me with a stigma, i will just continue to keep my head up high.
June 11, 2010 6:10 pm at 6:10 pm #919260KashaMemberThe bottom line is divorce is invoked far far too frequently, especially being pushed by corrupt therapists/counselors. And it is unfortunately done far more than necessary, where in many cases the marriage could have and should have been preserved.
The victims of the above-described cases are:
The ex-husband
The ex-wife
and most terrible of all…
The children
June 11, 2010 7:02 pm at 7:02 pm #919261WolfishMusingsParticipantespecially being pushed by corrupt therapists/counselors.
Just out of curiosity, do you feel that counselors have some reason for pushing divorce at the expense of the happiness of the couple, or do you think that they believe that divorce is the best thing for their clients.
In other words, are you accusing them of deliberate malpractice or gross ignorance?
The Wolf
June 11, 2010 7:41 pm at 7:41 pm #919262mischiefmakerMemberIf someone gets divorced we can’t say they are wrong. We aren’t in their place to judge. I definitely could say though that I know someone who’s in an abusive marriage (won’t go into detail) and is scared to get divorced because of the fact that anyone divorced or with a broken engagement is considered damaged and she’s scared she won’t ever get married again. Why should she be afraid?? She has been going to therapy with her husband and it hasn’t been helping (close to 10 years of marriage). Obviously, she’s not in a good marriage and she shouldn’t have to be afraid that divorce is “a dirty word”.
June 11, 2010 8:25 pm at 8:25 pm #919263GabboimMemberI happen to agree that there are many charlatans in the frum community under the guise of marriage counselors and therapists who push divorce at the first opportunity.
Why? Because that’s what their secular training in goyishe schools taught them.
June 11, 2010 8:28 pm at 8:28 pm #919264hereorthereMemberhis is a topic for the feminism thread, so I will answer it there.
It really has nothing to do with feminism (your assertions beside the point), but I responded there anyway.
The Wolf ”
They certainly have far more to do with feminism, then with broken engagements.
June 11, 2010 8:33 pm at 8:33 pm #919265hereorthereMemberWhen he is telling and encouraging her to think of her career as more important then anything else that is pushing, and like I said, I never heard of a feminist who would marry a man, who would NOT do that.
That’s not pushing. That’s a woman saying “I want to do XYZ” and her husband supporting it.
Pushing would be a man saying to his wife “I want you to go through medical school” even if she doesn’t want to. “;;;;;;;
Supporting would be supporting whatever she wanted to do, pushing
could also be(besides what you said)trying to steer someone into something that she may want to do but need a “push” to get going.
It may not be ‘HARD’ pushing but it most certainly is pushing.
If a someone considering marrying a feminist ‘supported’ her in following Torah more and feminism less, she and her feminist friends would most certainly claim he was ‘holding her back’.
They most likely would tell her to break it off or at least to give it to him for supposedlty ‘seeing women only as objects’.
This clash one way or another could easily cause a break up.
June 11, 2010 8:44 pm at 8:44 pm #919266WolfishMusingsParticipantThey certainly have far more to do with feminism, then with broken engagements.
Whatever. We discussed it over there. In fact, I still have an open question out to you there. Please respond there.
The Wolf
June 11, 2010 8:55 pm at 8:55 pm #919267hereorthereMemberSJSinNYC
Member
Kasha, divorce shouldn’t be a dirty word at all. There are plenty of marriages that should disolve including:
1) Physical/emotional Abuse
2) Cheating
3) Lying before marriage
4) Drug and alcohol abuse”;;;;;;;;;;;;;
And in Crown Heights or Williamsburg how often does a case like this come up?
Very rarely unless you ARE talking about cases so mild, that they do not qualify as “bad marriages”.
“And probably plenty more. We should support people who get divorced not make it a dirty word.”
I challenge anyone, to find a qualified Rav who will agree with this statement about not making divorce a dirty word.
Often such things are falsly claimed by women (or their families in a few cases) who have ulterior motives for breaking up the marriage, like for example; Where they can cheat the husband out of his business or inheritance.
Sometimes it is because the women want to become secular and so they falsly claim abuse.
Sometimes they falsly claim abuse of the children when in fact nothing could be further from the truth.
The feminist controlled courts, almost always side with the women with no m,ore evidence then a false claim by the women.
There are many men (not necessasrily Jews, certainly not all or most are Jews, but some probably are)
sitting in jail for no other reason then women told outright bald faced lies, about the men supposedly ‘abusing them’ and the courts believed them just because of the feminist influence on all of sciety.
A couple of examples prove the point (even though they are nit marriage examples, the same ideas still apply) like;
The Twanna Brawley case, where Al Sharpton used a woman as a false witness to lie that cops had suoposedly abused her and wa dismissed only because of massive publicity on behalf of the cops that embarrassed the judge into dropping the case for lack of evidence.
Another case is the Duke Lacross case where the prosecutor went ahead forcing the case against the innocent boys, and would getting fired for prosecutorial miscinduct, again ONLY because of
months of nationwide publicising of the case on FOX News and Talk radio.
Cases of false charges in marriage are usually more private and les scritinized by conservative media so sometimes such cases can cause an innicent man ti be railroaded into jail on false charges.
June 11, 2010 9:41 pm at 9:41 pm #919268hereorthereMember
“They certainly have far more to do with feminism, then with broken engagements.Whatever.”
That is just saying you have no argument, to refute what I said above, but you want it to seem like you do.
“We discussed it over there. In fact, I still have an open question out to you there. Please respond there.”
I have.
Now lets see if you will stick to discussing it, only over there, as you seem to be implying that I supposedly should.
June 11, 2010 10:25 pm at 10:25 pm #919269popa_bar_abbaParticipantThere are plenty of reasons to break a marriage besides cheating and drug abuse. The number one reason is because you want to. If you really want a divorce despite the public embarrassment and stigma that accompany it, not to mention the stigma on your kids as regards to shidduchim, you probably have a good reason. If you and your spouse after some time do not have a good relationship, you need a solution.
Of course in all situations you should try to work on the marriage first. You should certainly employ marriage counseling as well as counseling for each of you. But in the end, staying in a bad marriage is a crime to yourself and your kids.
Yell at me
June 11, 2010 10:36 pm at 10:36 pm #919270arosemParticipantHereorthere, I am so happy that you or your neighbors have never known the tzurus of living in a household where the two people are not meant to be together. Speaking from experience, there are times where divorce is absolutely necessary. Aside from your outlandish and ignorant claims that women and some men too never face any form of spousal abuse, claims which are not supported by your two examples that hardly apply to the situation of a family nor by statistical data, bad marriages do occur and it is often within the iron curtain of privacy allowed to the family institution that they flourish. Has it ever occurred to you that such instances might be beyond your knowledge because the parties involved fear shame and embarrassment from their situation?
And to those who believe the children are the greatest victims of a divorce: sometimes it is the children who have the most to gain. I am not talking about gaining material things because of alimony payments. I mean that when a couple stays together “for the sake of the children,” the onus of guilt that those children then have to carry with them for the rest of their lives is quite unbearable. It can do psychological damage and endanger the children’s own ability to form meaningful relationships in the future!
June 11, 2010 10:55 pm at 10:55 pm #919271KashaMemberMost divorces are preventable. It is unfortunate some people don’t give it a chance, and run to divorce court at the first sign of difficulty.
Al pi halacha, a person cannot insist on a divorce just cause s/he wants it. There has to be a reason that is considered actionable under the eyes of halacha.
June 13, 2010 12:26 am at 12:26 am #919272emoticon613Memberthere are many cases of divorce that are completely justified, such as clinical abuse.
however, there are such cases, even of clinical abuse, where the couple dealt with it together with a therapist, and are still happily married, and the children are fully relieved that the intended divorce did not happen. i was there, i witnessed the entire thing; the kids, although ablsolutely terrified when the parents fought physically, *begged* their mother to please not allow a divorce.
divorce should be a dirty word in the jewish home, but only as long as it’s theoretical. meaning, the education should be that marriage is forever, etc, etc. but when there is a case of divorce in the community, the community has to be supportive of all the victims, and not vindicitive in any way.
June 13, 2010 2:44 am at 2:44 am #919274oomisParticipantKasha, according to halacha it is actionable if a woman burns the husband’s dinner.
The main cause of divorce is marriage (ok that was a tongue in cheek statement). The truth is some people are emotionally pushed into quickly getting engaged to the wrong people (he’s a top boy, she’s a baalas chessed, it’s a perfect shidduch), who might otherwise be nice people but are still wrong for each other. They get married for the wrong, though possibly well-intentioned reasons, and barely know each other. They might eb too young, too immature, too self-centered to be ready to give themselves over to living with someone from a different family, who is NOT mommy and daddy, and used to doing things differently from the way in which they were brought up. the adjustment may be TOO hard for such a person, and counseling cannot help, ebcause fundamentally they are wrong for each other. Should they stay in such a marriage and make each other miserable. Should a girl or boy who are very warm and demonstrative and marry someone who is not so, stay in a marriage where they feel unloved? Marriage takes a lot of work, and some people are not cut out to be together. The tragedy is if there are children involved at this point.
June 13, 2010 2:51 am at 2:51 am #919275KashaMemberoomis, the halachicly actionable reasons differ between husband and wife.
Nevertheless, not being warm enough or feeling “unloved” is not a halachicly actionable reason for either party in the absence of more substantiative reasons.
Indeed you are correct; the greatest tragedy of divorces are the victimization of the innocent children.
June 13, 2010 3:07 am at 3:07 am #919276hereorthereMemberArosem I am so glad you have never been abused by feminists or abused in the name of feminism, becuase my life has been ruined by it from childhood till my 20’s or so.
By that time a patters was set then other then stepped in to make sure I could never fix the wreck, my life had become.
Speaking from experience, I have been directly involved with divorced people who were lied about and cheated by their feminist wives.
Since you are (falsly)claiming that not supporting lies by femninists is supposedly “claiming that no abuse exists” which I never said.
By YOUR claims against me your are by that same token claiming that women have never lied in divorces, or abused the court system;
Aside from your outlandish and ignorant claims that women supposedly never abuse the system, and never LIE to judges and courts who are extremly sympathetic to the feminist man hating, aganda;
My factual claims which you cannot refute and which are supported by my two examples that very much apply to the situation of a family and by statistical data, like all the court records which show MASSES of men convicted just because in each of THOSE (not ALL cases, but THOSE many, that I am talking about)
cases, a woman claimed abuse and divorces where the woman was the abuse and the cheater etc…and who still was awarded everything by the pro feminist anti male judge.
A prosecutor who deliberately withholds evidence to promote the feminist agenda in the Duke Lacross case,will do the same thing in divorce cases, so it DOES very clearly, prove my point.
And you claims that the children in most cases are more damaged by parents staying together are refuted by the cghildren themselves who later talk about how they were the ones whi were traumatized and felt guilty that THEIR fighting with their siblings or not always getting the top grades or not keeping their rooms clean enough, was what they as kids, had thought CAUSED the divorce.
This is besides the many many cases where the parents (usually by far, the mother) get custody and then very often uise that time to brainwash the kids into hating the other parent (again by far usually against the father since it is usually the mother, who does it)This happened to my step father and to a frend of mine and I just read about another case (among many that are ut there)where the mother had moved to another state to far for the father who had no money left after paying exhorbitant alimony to take time off from work to visit often.
When he did visit there was always some sudden trip or other thing the mother suddenly had to take the kids to go do so he could not see them then.
She lied that he did not care about them so he supposedly never came.
She kept them out of sports because she was pocketing the money he sent for sports equipment (which was supposed to be taken out of the amlinony that he always paid in full every month) telling them he did not want to show any fatherly love for them.
Years later one fo the boys who he had been very close with before the diviorce with said he never wanted to ever talk to his father again.
That is how messed up he had been by feminist ways.
June 13, 2010 3:28 am at 3:28 am #919277SJSinNYCMemberHereorthere, now I understand your position! You think EVERYTHING is a feminist conspiracy!
June 13, 2010 3:59 am at 3:59 am #919278hereorthereMemberSJSinNYC
Now I understand your position! You think EVERYTHING is a anti women conspiracy!
June 13, 2010 4:37 am at 4:37 am #919279smartcookieMemberHOT- that is not feminism. That is UGLY MIDDOS. Bad middos happen by men and woman and have nothing to do with feminism.
June 13, 2010 5:32 am at 5:32 am #919280oomisParticipant“Nevertheless, not being warm enough or feeling “unloved” is not a halachicly actionable reason for either party in the absence of more substantiative reasons.”
Actually, does the Torah not state that if the husband finds something unseemly in his wife he should give her a GET? And if she remarries, and her second husband hates her and divorces her, she cannot be re-married to the first husband. Check out Devarim Perek 24, Pesukim Aleph and Gimmel. I would find it rather hateful to be married to someone who made me feel unloved. But the Torah clearly uses finding fault and hate as criteria for divorce. Why should two people who make each other miserable stay in a loveless marriage?
June 13, 2010 5:37 am at 5:37 am #919281KashaMemberI’m not sure what is relevant about the fact a woman cannot remarry her first husband if she ever married someone else subsequently.
June 13, 2010 6:15 am at 6:15 am #919282hereorthereMemberSmartcookie Denying the obvious does not help.
The Feminists are the ones who rally and advocate for such things
and no one else, does.
June 13, 2010 6:47 am at 6:47 am #919283arosemParticipantHereorthere, I believe you are twisting my words and relying rather heavily on a personal anecdote. Firstly, I never said anything about the corruption that may lie behind some people, both men and women, when they involve the courts in their private relationships. I will agree that what you describe can and sometimes does happen. I think, though, that it is a far stretch to even say that this is the case most of the time. Do you honestly believe that so many people are so malicious in their pursuits for wealth and control? I think that perhaps many more of the people that you assume to be seeking out divorce deserve the benefit of the doubt that there are indeed serious problems involved. But if you look back to my original post, I never claimed that people never lie to get their way in court. A statement like that would be just as crazy as claiming that abuse never happens in a given community.
Secondly, I think that your definition of feminism is a little off. I know that this is not the place for such a discussion, but I will just say that siding with a woman does not automatically equal a feminist agenda (although depending on the motivation it can be, but may very well have nothing to do with what feminism actually is).
June 13, 2010 7:36 am at 7:36 am #919284hereorthereMemberArosem;
I did not twist your words (Words cannot be twisted anyway. They can be lied about or mocked, but not ‘twsited’).
You made false statements about what I supposedly said and I pointed that out.
“Firstly, I never said anything about the corruption that may lie behind some people, both men and women, when they involve the courts in their private relationships.”
Well I did, and you falsly claimed that I had supposedly said that there is never any abuse in marriages and I never said anything like that.
“I think, though, that it is a far stretch to even say that this is the case most of the time.”
That is what you WANT to believe, that does not make it true.
” Do you honestly believe that so many people are so malicious in their pursuits for wealth and control?”
Absolutely, just look at all the crime stats.
Something like 65% of those responding to poll at a big well known University (I think it was Harvard)said that they thought it was OK, to cheat on a test.
Look at the popularity of movies and TV shows promoting evil like “Breaking Bad” (the daily lives and adventures of drug dealers).
“I think that perhaps many more of the people that you assume to be seeking out divorce deserve the benefit of the doubt that there are indeed serious problems involved.”
The same could be said of those who get abortions or say Loshon Hara (of which there is plenty in many doviorces).
“But if you look back to my original post, I never claimed that people never lie to get their way in court. A statement like that would be just as crazy as claiming that abuse never happens in a given community.”
And yet in your first post to me, you falsly claimed that I had supposedly said that.
“Secondly, I think that your definition of feminism is a little off. I know that this is not the place for such a discussion, but I will just say that siding with a woman does not automatically equal a feminist agenda (although depending on the motivation it can be, but may very well have nothing to do with what feminism actually is). ”
You are doing it again.
That is not my definition of feminism.
Nowhere did I EVER say that anyone who EVER sides with any woman in any situation, was a feminist.
In fact in a another thread I pointed out that feminists were against women truly succeeding, when they did it on their own and were conservatives like Sarah Palin.
But someone who sides a with woman, when it may be questionable whether in a particular case, it is following Torah or not, and who will make excuses and attack those who point out that it may be wrong in ‘that’ case, or who make false accusations against anyone (like you did to me) me who does not toe the feminist line is obviously a feminist.
EDITED
June 13, 2010 12:42 pm at 12:42 pm #919285arosemParticipantI quoted this from one of your earlier posts:
“1) Physical/emotional Abuse
2) Cheating
3) Lying before marriage
4) Drug and alcohol abuse”;;;;;;;;;;;;;
And in Crown Heights or Williamsburg how often does a case like this come up?
Very rarely unless you ARE talking about cases so mild, that they do not qualify as “bad marriages”.”
So although you said “and you falsly claimed that I had supposedly said that there is never any abuse in marriages and I never said anything like that.” it seems that you said something very much like that.
June 13, 2010 2:58 pm at 2:58 pm #919286oomisParticipant“I’m not sure what is relevant about the fact a woman cannot remarry her first husband if she ever married someone else subsequently. “
I only quoted that because the posuk says if she marries a second husband and he HATES her, he may divorce her. The rest of the posuk was not specifically relevant to this issue, only th idea that a man could divorce his wife out of hatred for her (no specifics of why, just that he does).
I am not a big fan of even the idea of divorce. I think a couple should always try hard to work through their issues. But sometimes, there is nothing there for them to work WITH, much less through. Some people are not ready to get married, are not right for each other, and do not yet grasp what a true commitment means. In that case, I don’t think that two lives (more, if there are children involved) should be ruined just for the sake of staying together. BTW, the permanent emotionally damaging effect that a bad marriage has on the kids where constant arguing and/or abuse is involved, is far worse than the ultimate effect of a breakup. Many kids have expressed the relief they felt when their constantly arguing parents finally divorced. It’s a tragedy all around.
June 13, 2010 4:17 pm at 4:17 pm #919287hereorthereMemberArosem You told me that I have never experienced problems in divorces and then said bad marriages do occure so even if you did
not exactly claim that women never abuse the system that was the obvious implication of your attack on me.
And sasying that real abuse by men against women is rare in the heimish community is FAR from making “outlandish claims that it never happens”.
So what you want it to “seem like” and what it actually is, are two different things.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.