Home › Forums › Bais Medrash › Bishul Akum and Geirus
- This topic has 8 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 11 years, 5 months ago by popa_bar_abba.
-
AuthorPosts
-
June 16, 2013 4:00 am at 4:00 am #609666ilovetorahParticipant
the previos post about the chicken nuggets cooked by a goy, is there any way to mattir them, got me thinking.
so i would like to ask all the lomdei halacha in the CR. if a goy cooked something that would be assur because of bishul akum, and then he himself converted, would he be able to eat that food? my thought process is that since the issur of bishul akum is due to the problem of getting too comfortable with the goy [and eating in his house… marrying his daughter… eating treif food (see rashi and rishonim on the sugya in avoda zara)], that would seem not to be applicable if the goy who cooked the food was himself. what do you think?
June 16, 2013 4:17 am at 4:17 am #959363☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantAssur. Bishul Aku”m applies even in specific circumstances where there’s no chashash, for example, a childless non-Jew.
Cute, though.
June 16, 2013 5:24 am at 5:24 am #959364Sam2ParticipantDY: Not so Pashut. The food was never Assur to him. And since the reason is Chasnus, it doesn’t make sense to Asser it post-facto. See the Poskim who say that a Mumar can eat his own food and drink his own wine. It’s a Machlokes Achronim, but according to that Tzad I could see his own food being Muttar for him to eat.
June 16, 2013 6:01 am at 6:01 am #959365☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantThe food is bishul aku”m. The fact that it was not previously assur to him is irrelevant; neither was chazir.
The din of mumar is based on knas. We’re talking about an actual goy.
June 16, 2013 6:04 am at 6:04 am #959366Sam2ParticipantDY: Come to think of it, Stam Yeinam of a Ger has to be a Shaila that the Poskim talk about. I’ll do some searching and see if I can find a Makor. The Din should be the same in both situations.
June 17, 2013 3:03 am at 3:03 am #959367charliehallParticipantRabbi Ahron Soloveichik z’tz’l paskened that the laws of stam yeinam did not apply to persons in the process of conversion, as they have already renounced idolatry by declaring their intention to become Jews. I once say one of his talmidim open a bottle of non-mevushal wine, hand it to a goy who was in the process of converting, and instruct the goy to pour it into his kiddush cup. The talmid then made kiddush on the wine and gave it to everyone at the table!
June 17, 2013 3:51 pm at 3:51 pm #959368HaLeiViParticipantDoes that mean he held the same of Muslims?
June 17, 2013 4:44 pm at 4:44 pm #959369rebdonielMemberI’ve heard the same psak from Rav Ahron also said by Dayan Grossnass, and le ma’aseh, Rabbi Marc Angel and Rabbi Nathan Lopes Cardozo hold this way, as well.
I’ve also heard the same apply to Reform and Conservative converts on the grounds that they are obviously not idol-worshippers, even if they are not fully observant.
June 17, 2013 4:51 pm at 4:51 pm #959370popa_bar_abbaParticipantThis psak sounds curious. Does it apply to a ger toshav? Is that discussed in the halacha? (my otzar hachochma was running too slow last night, and now I’m too busy to look it up)
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.