Home › Forums › Decaffeinated Coffee › being Niftar Al Kiddush Hashem
- This topic has 88 replies, 23 voices, and was last updated 6 years, 5 months ago by Joseph.
-
AuthorPosts
-
May 10, 2016 7:45 pm at 7:45 pm #1180818Avram in MDParticipant
Joseph,
Thank you for pointing out your response. I don’t think it was “up” for viewing when I wrote mine.
He suggested Reb Elchonon was zoche to die al kiddish Hashem when the time came for him to leave this world; not that Reb Elchonon was zoche to die.
I understand this point in theory, but isn’t it presumptuous for a human being to say whether another man died at his proper time? Or to assert with certitude what was in the Divine calculus when a gadol was murdered? It doesn’t sit right with me. And furthermore, such thoughts can CV”S lead to callousness. When Rabbi Shimon ben Gamliel was murdered al kiddush Hashem before the eyes of Rabbi Yishmael the Kohen Gadol (which was actually Rabbi Shimon’s wish, because he did not want to witness the murder of the Kohen Gadol), did Rabbi Yishmael exclaim what a marvelous zechus it was that Rabbi Shimon received, or did he weep?
May 10, 2016 8:20 pm at 8:20 pm #1180819Avram in MDParticipantDaasYochid,
Why do you need to read it that way? Why not read it that his tefillos resulted in the z’chus, but that he died exactly when he was anyhow supposed to?
I don’t understand how dying al kiddush Hashem can be separated from dying. Also, I can understand the tefilla that, if/when it is my time, let it be meaningful, but that is different from coming in ex post facto and saying with authority what happened with someone and why.
May 10, 2016 8:39 pm at 8:39 pm #1180820JosephParticipantAvram,
Thank you for pointing out your response. I don’t think it was “up” for viewing when I wrote mine.
It wasn’t; I just wanted to reference your comment to my earlier addressing it.
I understand this point in theory, but isn’t it presumptuous for a human being to say whether another man died at his proper time?
The commenter didn’t implicate whether it was or wasn’t his proper time to die. All he indicated was that he was zoche to die al kiddush Hashem.
Or to assert with certitude what was in the Divine calculus when a gadol was murdered?
Everything that happens is a result of the Divine calculus. This assertion is no different than asserting Rabi Akiva (or any Jew murdered for being a Jew) died al kiddush Hashem.
…did Rabbi Yishmael exclaim what a marvelous zechus it was that Rabbi Shimon received, or did he weep?
Rabi Akiva exclaimed, before he was killed, what a zechus it was for him to die al kiddush Hashem. There’s no difficulty pointing out that someone died al kiddush Hashem or that it is a zchus to leave this world that way.
May 10, 2016 8:42 pm at 8:42 pm #1180821☕ DaasYochid ☕Participantisn’t it presumptuous for a human being to say whether another man died at his proper time?
Would you rather assume that R’ Elchonon died before his time?
May 10, 2016 8:48 pm at 8:48 pm #1180822☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantI don’t understand how dying al kiddush Hashem can be separated from dying.
Everybody dies. Some people have a special z’chus to die al kiddush Hashem. It’s not a matter of separating dying al kiddush Hashem from dying; it’s s matter of separating dying al kiddush Hashem from dying shelo al kiddush Hashem.
Also, I can understand the tefilla that, if/when it is my time, let it be meaningful, but that is different from coming in ex post facto and saying with authority what happened with someone and why.
Agreed; it’s a theory, not a certitude. I’m not saying I think that’s what happened, I just don’t think what he said deserved the response it got.
May 10, 2016 8:55 pm at 8:55 pm #1180823zahavasdadParticipantThe Post seemed to me to be posted very haughtingly and in a tone that warranted the response
May 10, 2016 8:59 pm at 8:59 pm #1180824☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantWhat made you think it was haughty?
May 10, 2016 9:01 pm at 9:01 pm #1180825zahavasdadParticipantThe way the language was written
May 10, 2016 9:05 pm at 9:05 pm #1180826☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantCan you be more specific?
May 10, 2016 9:08 pm at 9:08 pm #1180827Avram in MDParticipantJoseph,
All he indicated was that he was zoche to die al kiddush Hashem.
Not quite. He indicated that Rabbi Elchonon Wasserman died al kiddush Hashem because of tefillos the Chofetz Chaim davened with regard to himself.
DaasYochid,
Would you rather assume that R’ Elchonon died before his time?
Rabbi Elchonon was in his 60s when he was murdered. I also think he personally saw his murder as a kappara for the Jewish people.
It’s not a matter of separating dying al kiddush Hashem from dying; it’s s matter of separating dying al kiddush Hashem from dying shelo al kiddush Hashem.
Is being brutally murdered by sonei Yisroel the only way to die al kiddush Hashem? What about having the opportunity to say vidui and Shema and demonstrate faith and trust in Hashem even under the shadow of death, as opposed to R”L passing suddenly and unexpectedly?
May 10, 2016 9:10 pm at 9:10 pm #1180828zahavasdadParticipantbut in the merit of his prayers his primary talmid Reb Elchonon Wasserman, may G-d avenge his blood, was
Should have been written something like this..Although it probably never should have been written at all
The Chofetz Chaim’s primary talmid Rav Elchanon Wasserman was R’L killed by the Nazis YMSH. HYD
May 10, 2016 9:14 pm at 9:14 pm #1180829☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantZD,
Then his point.wouldn’t have been made. It seems you disagree with his point, but why is his making it haughty?
Avram, I think we assume that dying because one is a Jew is a tremendous z’chus. R’ Akiva could have also died as you describe, but we assume it was a bigger z’chus to die the way he did.
Why can’t dying in his sixties be the time he was supposed to, yet still be a kapparah?
May 10, 2016 9:20 pm at 9:20 pm #1180830zahavasdadParticipantits a strong language
He purposely used harsher language to make his point
Also its the poster themself. If I had written a similar post you would have gotten a different feeling, If a certain nameless trollish poster had posted it you would have gotten another feeling
May 10, 2016 9:22 pm at 9:22 pm #1180831Avram in MDParticipantQuestion: Are we being selfish when we bentch someone that he should live ad meah v’esrim? Should we rather wish for him that he [R”L] be killed by terrorists for being Jewish?
May 10, 2016 9:25 pm at 9:25 pm #1180832JosephParticipantAvram, he indicated that the Chofetz Chaim’s tefilos led kiddush Hashem to be the cause of his death; he didn’t indicate that the CC tefilos (or anything else) resulted in his dying any earlier than he would have otherwise died.
Is being brutally murdered by sonei Yisroel the only way to die al kiddush Hashem? What about having the opportunity to say vidui and Shema and demonstrate faith and trust in Hashem even under the shadow of death, as opposed to R”L passing suddenly and unexpectedly?
Being brutally murdered by sonei Yisroel is far more preferable than having the opportunity to say vidui and Shema and demonstrate faith and trust in Hashem even under the shadow of death.
May 10, 2016 9:44 pm at 9:44 pm #1180833☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantQuestion: Are we being selfish when we bentch someone that he should live ad meah v’esrim? Should we rather wish for him that he [R”L] be killed by terrorists for being Jewish?
No.
Nor are we being selfish if we daven that someone’s suffering be alleviated, or do something tangible to help someone. This is despite the fact that we know yissurin are a tremendous kapparah.
Nobody claimed that someone did or should daven for someone to die.
May 10, 2016 11:29 pm at 11:29 pm #1180834☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantWhen a new is killed by a Muslim in Israel R”L he is murdered because he is Jewish and muslims believe that they have a commandment to kill jews. Now is that not called a yid who was niftar al kiddush Hashem?
6 million Jews were killed in the holocaust R”L by the Nazi’s because they were Jews. And not because they wanted their homes or some other reason. Each precious yid murdered al kiddish Hashem
Please post a source for this concept that someone who was
killed because he was a Jew was niftar al Kiddush Hashem (and please read the 5th perek of Rambam’s Hilchos Yesodei Hatorah first.)
May 11, 2016 1:06 am at 1:06 am #1180835May 11, 2016 3:59 pm at 3:59 pm #1180836Avram in MDParticipantDaasYochid,
Question: Are we being selfish when we bentch someone that he should live ad meah v’esrim? Should we rather wish for him that he [R”L] be killed by terrorists for being Jewish?
Nobody claimed that someone did or should daven for someone to die.
No nobody did, however, the assertion was made that R’ Elchonon died al kiddush Hashem in his 60s because of the tefillos of the Chofetz Chaim. This is the Chofetz Chaim’s beloved talmid we are talking about, and surely the Chofetz Chaim davened for him to live a long life of Torah and sweet goodness, as follows from your answer to my question. If someone approached me and said that someone beloved to me was murdered by terrorists because of my tefillos for myself, I would be hurt tremendously, even though I know dying al kiddush Hashem is a tremendous zechus for the neshama. That’s why nobody in their right mind would ever say something like that to somebody. Do we not owe the holy Chofetz Chaim at least that same regard (even though he has passed away)??
Joseph,
From the beginning I think you have perceived the objection to mik5’s statement as being due to the concept of dying al kiddush Hashem vis a vis R’ Elchonon, and that assumption has largely driven the subsequent discussion. That’s not it for me. My objection is based on regard for the honor of the Chofetz Chaim, and asserting that we know the “mind” of Hashem.
May 11, 2016 4:41 pm at 4:41 pm #1180837JosephParticipantAvram, is it not obvious the decision of Hashem’s “mind” was that Reb Elechonon should leave this world al kiddush Hashem? How does attributing Hashem’s decision to the Chofetz Chaim’s tefilos detract from his honor?
May 11, 2016 4:43 pm at 4:43 pm #1180838☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantI’m not sure why you can’t see the distinction between causing his death and causing that he be a vehicle for kiddush Hashem.
May 11, 2016 5:47 pm at 5:47 pm #1180839Avram in MDParticipantJoseph,
Avram, is it not obvious the decision of Hashem’s “mind” was that Reb Elechonon should leave this world al kiddush Hashem?
Of course.
How does attributing Hashem’s decision to the Chofetz Chaim’s tefilos detract from his honor?
Because A: I don’t think the Chofetz Chaim would have appreciated such an attribution to his tefillos, and had such a statement been made during his lifetime, it would have caused him pain, and B: Who are we to make such attributions in the first place?
May 11, 2016 5:53 pm at 5:53 pm #1180840Avram in MDParticipantMay 11, 2016 6:06 pm at 6:06 pm #1180841Avram in MDParticipantDaasYochid,
I’m not sure why you can’t see the distinction between causing his death and causing that he be a vehicle for kiddush Hashem.
I don’t think my problem is a failure to see that there is a distinction, but rather that I think it is inappropriate to say something like that whether or not there is a distinction.
May 11, 2016 7:06 pm at 7:06 pm #1180842☢️ Rand0m3x 🎲ParticipantDaasYochid: http://www.aish.com/ho/i/48955481.html
I didn’t say “someone who was killed in the Holocaust,”
I said “someone who was killed because he was a Jew.”
(It’s always good to hear from Rabbi Lopiansky, though.)
May 11, 2016 7:36 pm at 7:36 pm #1180843☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantAvram:
It is not inappropriate to say that he caused him to be a vehicle for K”H.
May 11, 2016 8:07 pm at 8:07 pm #1180844☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantComlink-X:
I think conceptually, we can see a path to an approach for other situations.
This question has been discussed here before.
http://www.theyeshivaworld.com/coffeeroom/topic/dying-al-kiddush-hashem
May 12, 2016 1:57 pm at 1:57 pm #1180845Avram in MDParticipantDaasYochid,
It is not inappropriate to say that he caused him to be a vehicle for K”H.
Yes it is.
No it isn’t.
Yes it is.
No it isn’t.
Yes it is.
No it isn’t.
There, I let you have the last word.
No you didn’t.
Oops.
September 21, 2016 3:15 am at 3:15 am #1180846Mashiach AgentMemberbump for all those yidden that gave their lives up to save others in the 9/11 attacks. 15 years since they died al kiddush Hashem.
may all their neshamos have an aliya
September 22, 2016 3:56 pm at 3:56 pm #1180847dovrosenbaumParticipantIf a person is killed because they are asked to renounce Judaism but refuse, or if it’s another yehareg v’al ya’avor situation, that’s dying al kiddush hashem. I’m not sure about other cases.
June 14, 2018 7:54 am at 7:54 am #1539207JosephParticipantToday is the yahrzeit of the famous Ger Tzedek, Avrohom ben Avrohom, hy”d.
When Rav Avrohom was taken to be burned al kiddush Hashem for converting to Judaism, he requested from those who came to kill him that they honor his one last request as has been customary throughout the ages before killing someone.
They agreed. He asked to be taken to the Vilna Gaon. They brought him to the Gaon and he asked the Gaon the following question: “We know the rule of ‘Zerizim makdimim l’mitzvos – One should perform mitzvos with alacrity.’ According to that dictum I should be running to fulfill this mitzvah of dying al kiddush Hashem. On the other hand, the quicker I run, the quicker I will hasten my death and one must not hasten one’s death. What should I do? Run quickly or not?”
The Gaon wanted to answer his question but before he had a chance the soldiers hustled Rav Avrohom away. The Gaon rushed to the window and shouted after him, “Reb Avrohom, quicker!” Rav Avrohom began to walk quickly…
The Story about the Famous Ger Tzedek that Caused Rav Chaim Kanievsky to Burst into Tears
June 14, 2018 8:18 am at 8:18 am #1539218Avi KParticipantIs anyone here interested in living for kiddush Hashem?
June 14, 2018 8:59 am at 8:59 am #1539230Reb EliezerParticipantKilled for being a Jew is Kiddush Hashem. It says in Tzetil Katan 2 that in Krias Shma we should have in mind that a fire is burning, forced to convert and we throw ourselves in there for the name of Hashem rather than convert.
June 14, 2018 12:06 pm at 12:06 pm #1539434JosephParticipant“Is anyone here interested in living for kiddush Hashem?”
Yes. But dying Al Kiddush Hashem is the biggest form of Kiddush Hashem that we can attain and hope for.
June 14, 2018 12:39 pm at 12:39 pm #1539500DovidBTParticipantBut dying Al Kiddush Hashem is the biggest form of Kiddush Hashem that we can attain and hope for.
Dying Al Kiddush Hashem is better than living Al Kiddush Hashem?
June 14, 2018 1:08 pm at 1:08 pm #1539515JosephParticipant“Dying Al Kiddush Hashem is better than living Al Kiddush Hashem?”
Both are great. But it’s a bigger Kiddush Hashem to die Al Kiddush Hashem. It’s something every Jew should hope for.
June 14, 2018 1:51 pm at 1:51 pm #1539541Avi KParticipantJoseph, Rav Chaim Brisker said the opposite. However, if you are really interested maybe you can join an elite IDF unit and volunteer for the most dangerous missions.
June 14, 2018 1:51 pm at 1:51 pm #1539535PhilParticipantJudaism is not a death-oriented religion but a life-oriented one. As the Gemara tells us, it is much more difficult to live an entire life Al Kiddush Hashem than it is to die in that manner. We don’t get to choose how we leave this world but we do get to choose how we live in this world. While a Jew must be prepared to die Al Kiddush Hashem, there is no source that says we must hope for it. R. Akiva’s famous statement was made about himself and there are a number of fascinating explanations as to why.
June 14, 2018 1:51 pm at 1:51 pm #1539529DovidBTParticipantIt’s a bigger Kiddush Hashem to die Al Kiddush Hashem. It’s something every Jews should hope for.
I’ve never come across that principle in my humble studies.
Suppose you’re davening from your phone, and the lithium battery explodes and kills you, cv”s. Would that be dying Al Kiddush Hashem? If so, that’s an argument in favor of smartphones. I never heard of a conventional bound siddur exploding.
June 14, 2018 5:41 pm at 5:41 pm #1539922JosephParticipantReread this thread please. I think the source for what I said was brought the last time this thread was active (by someone else.)
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.