Home › Forums › Life Stories › Another Reason Not to go to Law School
- This topic has 5 replies, 5 voices, and was last updated 10 years, 4 months ago by Randomex.
-
AuthorPosts
-
July 13, 2014 2:49 am at 2:49 am #613192squeakParticipant
A friend asked me to post this legal question for a friend of his. He was afraid that if he posted it for his friend everyone would think it was for himself.
See this friend of my friend was driving down a hill without riding his brakes and blew through a yellow/reddening light at the intersection. A cop was sitting at the light on the crossing street (meaning 90 degrees across the intersection waiting for his light to turn green), saw him, and pulled him over. The cop accused him of speeding and running a red light, both of which could have been true. However, he had no evidence of the speeding (no radar reading) so he just wrote a ticket for not stopping at the red light.
The question is, was this cop wrong for writing the red light ticket? From where he was sitting at the intersection there is no way he could see what color the light in that direction was – he was facing the wrong side of the light. He could assume what the color was, but can he testify that the violation happened if he could not have witnessed the color of the light? Is it worth pleading not guilty and trying this as a defense?
July 13, 2014 3:20 am at 3:20 am #1023499☕ DaasYochid ☕ParticipantMy friend’s friend had the same thing happen to him. I (I mean he) pleaded not guilty, claiming thay the cop couldn’t tell based on his angle. I (oops again – HE) was found guilty anyway, because the cop lied and said he was at an angle to see the light in both directions.
July 13, 2014 1:26 pm at 1:26 pm #1023500👑RebYidd23ParticipantCops are believed. That is how it goes.
July 13, 2014 7:36 pm at 7:36 pm #1023501squeakParticipantBut is the cop actually wrong for writing the ticket, or is his ability to sense that the light was red based on how soon afterwards his side turned green a fair way to catch someone in the act?
July 14, 2014 2:18 am at 2:18 am #1023504popa_bar_abbaParticipantBring a quarter to the hearing, and your brother with a flashlight.
Have your brother stand facing away from you. Have the cop stand at a 90 degree angle behind your brother.
Have the judge flip the quarter, and tell the cop to watch it.
Then ask the cop if your brother flashed the flashlight at you.
This will conclusively prove, that berrish, is 100% innocent, and it was johann who broke the wall.
Alternatively, get a pail of water, and 2 wagons to collide, and 6 bands playing od yishoma, and 4 women selling shmattas, and wash them all into the mabuyi river while we all laugh and sing.
July 15, 2014 5:23 am at 5:23 am #1023505RandomexMemberShmuel Kunda reference FTW! (That’s “for the win”, for those of you who don’t speak Internet-ese. “for the win”, that means… ah, forget it.)
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.