Alvin Bragg – a District Attorney who lacks any Ethics

Home Forums Decaffeinated Coffee Alvin Bragg – a District Attorney who lacks any Ethics

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #2292200
    SQUARE_ROOT
    Participant

    The article shown below appeared on JNS dot org on 2024 June 21:
    ============================================

    Bragg declines to charge dozens of anti-Israel protesters at Columbia
    The Manhattan district attorney “who charged President Trump
    with 34 felonies over an internal business record
    is letting violent, pro-Hamas rioters go free,” said Sen. Tom Cotton.

    Despite dramatic video footage showing the New York City Police
    Department entering a building on the Columbia University campus
    on the Upper West Side to arrest anti-Israel protesters who had
    barricaded themselves within, Alvin Bragg, the Manhattan district attorney,
    is declining to press charges against many of the alleged offenders.

    A Manhattan prosecutor “argued that the defendants should not
    face criminal penalties, citing their lack of criminal histories and
    arguing that the protesters will face internal discipline at Columbia,”
    The Washington Free Beacon reported from within the courthouse on Thursday.

    “The prosecutor also argued that Bragg’s office lacked evidence
    to land convictions in the cases, given those who occupied Hamilton Hall
    wore masks and covered up surveillance cameras,” the paper added.
    “New York City police arrested the occupiers while they were inside Hamilton Hall.”

    The Free Beacon reported that Bragg’s office dismissed charges
    against 30 of the 46 people arrested for allegedly entering the building illegally.

    After the charges were dismissed, one protester, “whose entire head
    was covered with a ski mask,” said at a press conference that
    “the protesters ‘resist the pigs, the police in the U.S.’”

    “This is standing with Palestinian resistance,” the protester said,
    per the Free Beacon. “This is an interlinking of our struggles—
    struggles against carceral violence, against colonialism, against racism,
    against genocide.” The person also said that the protesters
    “refuse to condemn the Palestinian resistance.”

    JNS sought comment from the Manhattan D.A.’s office.

    Sen. Tom Cotton (R-Ark.) wrote that Bragg, “who charged
    President Trump with 34 felonies over an internal business
    record is letting violent, pro-Hamas rioters go free.”

    Rep. Tim Burchett (R-Tenn.) called the Manhattan prosecutor’s
    decision “gutless.” The watchdog group StopAntisemitism
    commented that it was “flabbergasted” at Bragg’s decision.

    Gerard Filitti, senior counsel at the Lawfare Project, wrote that
    Bragg dropped the charges “for lack of evidence that they were
    trespassing in a building they barricaded themselves in.”

    “It’s time for the Justice Department to step in
    and protect our civil rights,” he added.

    #2292570
    akuperma
    Participant

    He is very ethical and lets his sense of ethics guide his work. He knows to try to throw Trump in jail on absurd charges (paying off a blackmailer is legal, the blackmailer is the criminal, not the victim). He understands that Trump is be definition the enemy of the people and needs to be in prison, and since the Constitution prohibits Bills of Attainder, he uses the tools available.

    He also knows that Jews are “our misfortune” as the goyim say, and that those demanding the elimination of the Jews are doing a public service and should of course not be prosecuted.

    Bragg’s perceptions of ethics reflect the mainstream of the American left, and the Democratic party. The problem are the “useful idiots” who enable those with such beliefs to come to power and use their power to implement their anti-democratic agenda.

    #2292906
    SQUARE_ROOT
    Participant

    Judge Judy renders verdict on NY v. Trump case: ‘Nonsense’
    by Chris Pandolfo, 2024 June 22
    ======================================

    Judge Judy Sheindlin has delivered a verdict on Manhattan
    District Attorney Alvin Bragg’s successful prosecution of
    former President Trump, calling the case “nonsense.”

    The famous TV arbiter told CNN host Chris Wallace that
    as a “taxpayer in this country,” she resents Bragg for
    “using the system for your own personal self-aggrandizement.”

    “And that’s what you think the DA did in Manhattan?”
    Wallace asked in an interview that streamed Friday on Max.

    “That’s what I think. I mean, if you look — you
    had to twist yourself into a pretzel to figure out
    what the crime was,” said [Judy] Sheindlin.

    A jury convicted former President Trump last month
    on all 34 felony counts of falsifying business records
    during his 2016 campaign to conceal a $130,000
    payment to Stormy Daniels, a pornographic performer,
    to silence her about an alleged affair with Trump in 2006.

    SOURCE: various news networks, including:
    MSN dot com, CBS, Fox News, and many others

    PS: In January 2024, Judge Judy Sheindlin publicly attacked
    both ex-President Donald Trump and President Joe Biden.
    She publicly endorsed Nikki Haley for USA President.
    So she is not a pro-Trump fanatic.

    #2293741
    WiseSage58
    Participant

    Alvin Bragg, yemach shemo
    More need not be said

Viewing 4 posts - 1 through 4 (of 4 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.