עד אחד נאמן באיסורין

Home Forums Decaffeinated Coffee עד אחד נאמן באיסורין

Viewing 32 posts - 1 through 32 (of 32 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #2311744
    ☕️coffee addict
    Participant

    How does it work?

    Example: if a lady get remarried based on an עד אחד but really her husband is alive and the עד really thought he died, does the עד get an עבירה בשוגג?

    There are other examples I’m wondering about and will probably bring them later

    #2311974
    Menachem Shmei
    Participant

    What does this have to do with עד אחד נאמן באיסורים?

    You’re wondering if it’s an aveira for an עד or עדים to give a mistaken testimony?

    #2312009
    Shazsheri
    Participant

    Excellent, excellent question. There are many different aspects to this שאלה:
    (As an aside, עד אחד נאמן באיסורין has nothing to do with עדות אשה, so the title of the post is slightly misleading)
    1) Obviously the מחלוקת between the רמב״ם and the ראב״ד regarding whether כאשר זמם is applied to a שוגג.
    (Somewhere in פרק כ׳ עדות)
    2) Whether this מחלוקת extends to לא תענה or not. (חזון איש somewhere in מרובה)
    3) Whether an עד אחד is included in לא תענה and הזמה
    4) If it does, is עדות אשה, where an עד אחד is only נאמן because of דייקא ומינסבא, considered an עד with regards to לא תענה (Reb Akiva Eiger in a tshuva towards the end of chelek alef)((also in דרוש וחידוש somewhere i think i remember))הרבה יש לפלפל בדבריו
    5) Assuming there is no איסור דאורייתא, is there an inyan of שוגג by dirabonons? (נתיבות, reb elchonon, and so on)

    And obviously all the roshei yeshiva, etc. who weigh in with their two cents on these inyanim.

    ישמע חכם ויסף לקח וכו׳

    הרבה יש לפלפל בזה and you could rest assured that אין כאן מקומו.

    Honestly it’s nice to have a breath of fresh air from all the balderdash that goes on here about Trump and Kamala Harris and the rest of the idiotic buffoonery which people have been taught is important. Keep ’em coming!

    #2312060
    @fakenews
    Participant

    This is not really the forum to get a full rabbinical education,but the short answer to your question is Ein davar she’b’ervah pachos mishnayim.
    In the rare circumstance that we allow a lady to remarry based on an Ed echad, there are a number of criteria that must be met, including the woman testifying that “bari li” among other criteria.

    The way you are asking the question indicates that you aren’t a major masmid in BMG,so I am going to assume that you are a BY graduate. (not that it makes a difference to the validity of your question)

    In general עד אחד נאמן באיסורין will be in effect with a minor issur (think not chayav kareis) where there is no financial incentive (think a shopkeeper on his own product).
    Again, this is the light version of the answer and to really address the question you must take steps to learn more. please find a shiur on the topic, rather than putting your genuine curiosity to the whims of random (often unqualified) opinions on the internet.

    And no, while there are many bnei yeshiva in the coffee rooms of yeshivos far and wide, the coffee room is not the appropriate place to get Torah education.

    #2312081
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    I think we need two edim to get married. Ain davar shebarva pachos mishenayim

    #2312084
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    If they were two witnesses that he died and he turns out to be alive, teitzei mizeh umizeh, both have to be divorced.

    #2312097
    ☕️coffee addict
    Participant

    Menachem,

    Im asking if the testimony comes out to be an עבירה like אשת איש (in this case) does the עד get it even though nobody knows about it

    Shazsheri,

    Thank you but I’m asking in the way of what I just said to Menachem (like in your 4th part)

    Fakenews,

    I’m not and would’ve never been in BY and as shazsheri is saying but it’s Elul so I forgive you

    #2312102
    Ishpurim
    Participant

    When I asked Professor LF where is the source for one witness by מת בעלך he immediately responded that לא יקום עד אחד באיש but באשה הוא קם. So you see he did not use a ghost rider like others did but knew the מקור.

    #2312109
    amiricanyeshivish
    Participant

    @Shazshen

    “And obviously all the roshei yeshiva, etc. who weigh in with their two cents on these inyanim.”

    You seem like a Yodea Sefer and maybe even a Talmid Chochom, but that line is mevazeh Talmidei Chachomim, which Chazal put in the category of apikores.

    #2312138
    Sam Klein
    Participant

    To avoid making any mistakes for such a serious question in Halacha ask your LOR

    #2312152
    Shazsheri
    Participant

    @@fakenews

    I hope you׳re just trolling, because not one thing you said has any basis in the talmud or halacha. Number one, his question has to do with whether an ע״א is considered a שוגג, and he picked a perfectly valid example of עדות אשה, where an ע״א is נאמן, so your אין דשב״ע פחות מב׳ response is unintelligible.

    Number two, allowing an עד אחד to be מתיר her להינשא is not a ״rare circumstance”, and you just added on a ridiculous, false condition of ״bari li” which any בר בי רב לחד יומא understands is made up, and can only have been created by someone who hasn’t the foggiest, working knowledge of יבמות, כתובות, גיטין, קידושין, שבועות, etc., etc.

    Number three, Your prophetic vision about a “minor issur not ״חייב כרת could only have been dreamt up by someone who didn’t even see רש״י or תוספות on the first folio of gittin. Even a היינטיגע ראש ישיבה couldn’t be so ignorant.

    Number four, your ״financial incentive” hogwash comes from a violent perversion of a גמרא in עבודה זרה and a רמב”ם and your ignorance is bliss.

    Your response is not the ״light version” or the answer but rather the imbecile version of the answer.

    As far as your allegation that the original poster is not crom BMG, I can only glean from your blathering response that you are from BMG, because only someone who has been through a whole machzor of ignorance could have composed this.

    ואתה שלום.

    #2312234
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    One put one hand into his pocket, the Satmarer Rav ztz’l said that he should put both hands in as ein davar sheberva pachos mishnayim.

    #2312239
    ☕️coffee addict
    Participant

    Shazsheri

    Thanks for the defense

    Next

    If a mashgiach isn’t sure that what he sees is a bug so he says to himself “eh I don’t think it’s a bug” and passes it (but really it is a bug) (there are other examples with hashgacha), does he get an עבירה of לפני עור does the רב המכשיר get an עבירה that this guy that he hired didn’t do his job well, does no one get an עבירה because of לא נתנה תורה למלאכי השרת

    #2312246
    amiricanyeshivish
    Participant

    @Shaszeri

    “Even a היינטיגע ראש ישיבה couldn’t be so ignorant.”

    Why the continuous Mevazeh Talmidei Chachomim??? Are you so arrogant you don’t even care to forfeit your olam habah for a little letzanus??

    #2312248
    Shazsheri
    Participant

    @Ishpurim Amazing mareh makom. Did he tell you where this is? Who is Professor LF? If he answered you this on the spot, he’s a huge talmid chochom. 🙏

    #2312359
    Ishpurim
    Participant

    All I can say is that he was a son of the Solobodker Illuy in Brownsville. I remember a shiur by the RY Rav AYHP who said that causing a stumbling block for someone requires Teshuva. We learn that out from Yaakov sending Yoseph to check on his brothers. The shiur may be on Utube on וישלחהו מעמק חברון.

    #2312423
    Shazsheri
    Participant

    @Ishpurim you knew the Rebbe Reb Louis Zatzal? אשריך
    You had what to do with Dmitrovsky or Halivni?

    #2312456
    ujm
    Participant

    Reb Eliezer: Why does she need a divorce for the second one? As her first husband is alive, the marriage to the second was never valid in the first place.

    #2312552
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    The Nodah Beyehudah discusses the above Sifri in M’K Even Ezet 33 when we can trust one witness by a woman. Maybe we trust him because he will not lie as it will reveal itself

    #2312556
    ☕️coffee addict
    Participant

    Ujm,

    The גמרא says תצא מזה ומזה in this case

    #2312588
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    The Beis Meir Even Ezer 17, 3 quotes the above Nodah Beyehudah and discusses the topic in great detail. The above from LF is a Sifri on Shoftim.

    #2312596
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    The wife also will not get married again until she knows for sure.

    #2312737
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    The chachamim actually. remove the marriage from the second one which was done on the their agreement that the children will not be mamzerim. Maybe since she believed that the first one was dead, the second one might be a good marriage.

    #2312989
    ujm
    Participant

    Reb Eliezer: I understood that if there were children from the second, they’re mamzeirim — even if she honestly mistakenly thought the first one passed away, even though he was alive.

    #2313119
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    Kol hamekadesh adateh derabonon mekadesh, afkeh rabonon kedushin mineh.

    #2313243
    ☕️coffee addict
    Participant

    Ujm is correct

    We say בנים ממזרים חזה ומזה

    #2314156
    ☕️coffee addict
    Participant

    Anyone want to answer

    If a mashgiach isn’t sure that what he sees is a bug so he says to himself “eh I don’t think it’s a bug” and passes it (but really it is a bug) (there are other examples with hashgacha), does he get an עבירה of לפני עור does the רב המכשיר get an עבירה that this guy that he hired didn’t do his job well, does no one get an עבירה because of לא נתנה תורה למלאכי השרת

    #2314346
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    Look at the consequences of making a mistake which determines the punishments.

    #2314379
    nishtdayngesheft
    Participant

    CA,

    You are referring to eid echad ne’eman bissurim and then you ask “If a mashgiach isn’t sure that what he sees is a bug so he says to himself “eh I don’t think it’s a bug” and passes it (but really it is a bug)”. How is that eidus, if he says he is unsure? I have never heard of an eidus where the eid says they are unsure.

    #2314567
    ☕️coffee addict
    Participant

    Nisht,

    Do you think mashgichim are sure about everything they check?

    Better yet, a housewife knows what a bug looks like and she checks her lettuce (at least Pesach night)?

    #2314691
    Reb Eliezer
    Participant

    By eid echad we have no way to validate the testimony.

    #2314863
    catch yourself
    Participant

    The aggressiveness with which certain people articulate their posts is often in direct proportion to the “am ha’aratzus” in their position.

    I usually ignore it, but sometimes…

    The Gemara’s exemplary cases of עד אחד נאמן באיסורין are חלב and דם, both of which are חיובי כרת.

    Anyway…

    The Gemara says that the reason she needs a גט from the second “husband” is that we are concerned that people might assume that she had been divorced from the first husband before marrying the second, so if we allow her to remarry again without a גט משני, they will think we allowed an אשת איש to remarry.

    I think the original question is very interesting, and it is not limited to the case of עדות אשה. Any time a person’s testimony is relied upon (such as when my wife prepares and serves dinner, implying that the food is kosher), a similar question can be raised.

    I would guess that it is לפני עור בשוגג, but it’s like to do some research.

Viewing 32 posts - 1 through 32 (of 32 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.