adams -“Health – when you label any view or opinion which is not yours as ‘PC’ some sort of code, not sure what it means, its’ always thrown around. like PC is bad and then the other side of the coin is good.”
Now you’re finally seeing the Light!
“This case especially is not black and white.”
You’re right Zim is Hispanic and it was still PC to trump up all these charges.
“THe problem as I see it, each perspective has a narrative. If you think Z should get no punishment or that he even should have been arrested, this is because you buy into his exact version, that he was for no reason attacked with a severity which made him decide that he must kill or be killed.”
So you don’t know which version is right -so is it Innocent until Proven Guilty or is It Guilty until Proven Innocent?
“However, my main problem with that scenario, is the kid was not wrong in where he was at the time, the fundamental foundation of the story.”
So therefore he couldn’t intiate an attack on Zim?!? Ridiculous!
Is this “PC”? I am troubled by the fact that he was abusing these drugs. One of them, it tells you – must sleep for 7 hours upon taking this. So he abused the drugs.
But heavy drugs like this at play, is not a good defense.”
These are normal drugs given to normal people -so you are defaming him by saying abusing. Yes, sometimes they have side effects, but given that they are prescribed -the PCP will address those issues. So the asumption is these drugs are helping the pt., not hindering. If “Pot” is legal in the State of Fl. did Martin have a prescription for it? I really don’t think so. Your whole post is based on what is PC, not based on this country’s Constitution and laws. How about reading the Bill of Rights before condenming people based on what is popular in our Society?