DY- rashi in RH i think on yud ches amud beis towards the bottom says that because klal yisroel was noheg chanuka for a long time and everyone was noheg to treat it as a quasi-y’t therefore it is kitorah. but the end of rashi says ulichain eino nachon livatlo, which would be mashma that this concept isnt mamash mamash. im remembering, not quoting.
Menu