Oomis, thank you, I think you write a lot clearer, much better.
Curiosity, thank you, too. (is that a line from me…?)
And to you truthsharer,
No, Oomis wrote clear, concise, tzum zach. Coming from a woman, she’s put it down really well.
What’s so “very dangerous to say that women should not do optional stuff”?
I’d say take their meshugas for instance. They’re coming to try and make you think they’re interested in doing “more”, Oh yeah. All the while disregarding the basic concepts of tznius. IN THE SAME ACT. That is the essence of ?? ??????, according to one explanation, because it will cause ??? ?????. If I’m the one making up the game, I can do as I see fit.
Now, of course I’m discussing where they’d be sincere about it, where they’re doing it totally the the Mitzvah, for the Kedusha, for HaShem’s sake. Oh Yeah! Totally! C’mon, face reality. As I wrote before, their obnoxious in-your-face untznius brazen pictures won’t make it into the Yeshiva World. FOR A REASON!
They’re not at all in it for the “kedusha”…And you know that.
Shaking a lulav for the mitzva’s sake will bring a woman closer to HaShem. Creating a matzav, a brazen spectacle, an affront to Yiddishkite, every month, at the place it hurts most, will not. Again, I suspect you know that too. (you do appear to be literate,, educated)
Shouldn’t a truthsharer be open-minded to some truth too?