Reply To: Kamtza & Bar Kamtza

Home Forums Bais Medrash Kamtza & Bar Kamtza Reply To: Kamtza & Bar Kamtza

#942051
msseeker
Member

“rav Miller pointed out that the sinas chinam referred means the sinah of the prushim for the tsedukkim!”

Terrible mistake. Rav Miller pointed out that the sinas chinam referred means the sinah of the TSEDUKIM for the PRUSHIM! He explains that the Rabanan did not want to eat with a rasha. This is not sinas chinam! ??? ?????? ?’ ????. Chas veshalom to say that ??”? were ???? on ????? ????? ????.