When I see Horowitz promoting Lapin, his neutrality becomes suspect.
When the woman who testified on Weberman’s behalf is vilified by so called victims’ advocates with filthy lies, while their “victim” is not allowed to be criticized at all, I wonder, is this how you promote the truth?
When credit card purchases are presented as evidence even though the victim never mentioned anything regarding them just because the store names sound salacious ( BTW I was recently at one of their stores in BP and they DID NOT have underwear for sale AT ALL) I wonder why stoop so low?
When I read how bored guys taking pictures in court is considered a choreographed campaign to intimidate and “out” her when you wouldn’t find anybody in Willy that doesn’t know her name I wonder some more.
When media accounts extol her as beautiful while Weberman is described as anything but, with even his beard getting a bad rap, I wonder isn’t a jury human with natural biases, why not place a media gag order while the trial is on (yes, some info would leak out but the jurors are probably not in the loop and would have to seek it out and it wouldn’t be as juicy as the NYP)?
When he gets 103 years with no concrete evidence I wonder how impartial was the judge all along?
So MR remind me again who’s in denial here?