Reply To: Bishul Akum?

Home Forums Controversial Topics Bishul Akum? Reply To: Bishul Akum?

#883242
hello99
Participant

DY: “You didn’t cite sources, besides which, your list is anyhow incomplete”

You could have asked. Tzitz Eliezer is 9:41.Rav Belsky is in OU document a-133, I have requested it from the OU and will post it when I receive it. Rav Nebenthal is ????? ???? – ?? ?? ????

???? (?”? ???? ???”?) : ??? ?? ?? ???? ???? ????? ?? ???”?, ??? ???? ?? ????? ????? ?

?????: ?’ ????? ????

I’m sorry it was incomplete. I shouldn’t have left out the Kaf HaChaim 113:1 who is also lenient.