Home › Forums › Controversial Topics › Bishul Akum? › Reply To: Bishul Akum?
December 21, 2011 8:58 pm at 8:58 pm
#883201
hello99
Participant
DY: YD 53:4 IS a chumra. See Shach and Taz that we are Meikil with any minimal Tlia.
So is 48:12, because a child has no Ne’emanus.