Home › Forums › YWN Main Site & Coffee Room Issues › Pollard in light of Missouri v. Frye, 10-444 and Lafler v. Cooper, 10-209 › Reply To: Pollard in light of Missouri v. Frye, 10-444 and Lafler v. Cooper, 10-209
March 22, 2012 5:40 pm at 5:40 pm
#861743
dullradiance
Participant
Thank you artchill.
If Pollard wasn’t advised of Rule 11 C 1 A&C then he “received constitutionally defective advice from counsel during plea bargain negotiations”.
Of course the court ruled that if a defendant rejects a plea deal because of defective advice then a defendant is entitled to relief.
In this case it is possible that Pollard accepted a plea deal based on defective advice.