“If logic shows that it should have an effect, it is still fine because in 20 years no arab stabbed a jew at one of their protests?”
Thats exactly my point, both evidence and logic shows that it has no effect. The logical part is, why would an Arab kill a Jew because some dude said he wants to be friends with the Arabs.
You are confusing the issue. The harm is from our inability to fight back. That has a clear logical link.
Also, you still have not responded why it is fine for them to do something which is logically dangerous, based on some internet poster (me) not being able to find a definite effect to your level of proof.
If I am correct and they are contributing to our not being able to fight back, shouldn’t they stop?
Shouldn’t they need to prove that is not happening, before they can continue?
Aren’t they at least being reckless, even under your definitions? (I personally think they are being purposeful, which is more than reckless, but we can proceed that you should at least agree they are being reckless.)
I will note that under the common law, reckless killing is manslaughter, while extreme reckless killing is murder.