mod 39: then how can you not let through a different post that you don’t see a point in? couldn’t it maybe funny or thought-provoking to someone else?
Granted. However, I do have 2 tiers shall we call them. In tier 1, I’ll just leave it for another moderator. In tier 2, I’ll just delete it outright.
Lets be clear. There is a difference between something I disagree with (which will go through) and something with is presented in such a way which (I feel) makes it valueless.
As an example, How many times do I allow someone (in page 5!) to jump into a proper discussion (e.g. Chalav Akum) and let them make a general blanket statement (e.g. There is no difference between Chalav Stam and Chalav Akum)[making up an example, this did not happen]? What is the value of allowing that in the middle of a well thought out, well articulated, civil disagreement?
Also, new topics are judged stricter, as I try to see, not only where it is, but where it will be going.