Reply To: Cholov Akum

Home Forums Kashruth Cholov Akum Reply To: Cholov Akum

#772715
Feif Un
Participant

ujm: Why do you need PM’s interpretation when you already have the interpretation of R’ Belsky and R’ Dovid Feinstein? Is their word not good enough for you? For myself, I’ll follow their psak. If you don’t want to, that’s fine. Just don’t try and make it seem like I’m doing something wrong.