Gut voch Daas: “I don’t understand, your point about mius. The issue here, is that according to the ??????, these anisakis are ??? ????.”
Let me try to clear up your confusion. To refresh your memory, I posited a potential heter based on predation and you countered that the worms should obtain the halacha of the shrimp host and become assur as ???? ?? ????. I responded with the ???? ??? permitting ???? and you replied that the ??”? ???”? explain the heter of ???? as ?????. I stated that the same ????? they use to permit ???? could apply to worms, and my heter of predation could be ???”?. Now is it clear?
I’m not sure what you want from ??? ?? ???, it doesn’t apply to fish.
Very true, which is why I am uncomfortable with the heterim based on minei gavli. However if these worms were never ???? ?? ???? they are mutar based on other, easily understood seifim in S.A. and it is not necessary to resolve the understanding of darna and YD 84:16.