Artscroll's Nusach Sphard Siddur

Home › Forums › Decaffeinated Coffee › Artscroll's Nusach Sphard Siddur

Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • November 1, 2016 11:24 pm at 11:24 pm #618609
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    It says, and I quote “Because it is a separate section of Shachris with a purpose all its own, P’sukei D’zimrah is introduced with a blessing (baruch shaamar) and concluded with a blessing (yishtabach)… Accordingly, the verses of hodu should properly follow baruch shaamar, as they indeed do in Nusach Ashkenaz.”

    They created the world’s first self-loathing siddur.

    November 3, 2016 11:58 pm at 11:58 pm #1189728
    theprof1
    Participant

    Nusach Sefard has Hodu before psikei deimra because in the Beis Hamikdosh they said Hodu after the korbon tomid but before the schachris davevening. Nusach Ashkenaz considered Hodu as part of the Zimra as part of Hodu is from tehilim. Instead of just posting, why don’t you look this up?

    November 4, 2016 7:45 pm at 7:45 pm #1189729
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    You completely misunderstood my post. Myself, and 90% of CR posters, are well aware of why baruch shamar falls where it does in the various nusachs. What I was pointing out, is that Artscroll actually put in the work to print a siddur, which, in its own commentary, calls itself less correct than the alternative.

    November 4, 2016 8:09 pm at 8:09 pm #1189730
    Joseph
    Participant

    Artscroll, as an institution, is Nusach agnostic. (Pardon the pun.)

    November 8, 2016 10:34 am at 10:34 am #1189731
    Neville ChaimBerlin
    Participant

    I agree, Joseph. But, it seems like the person who wrote that particular part of the commentary was not keen on nusach Sphard.

    Also, their tachanun in nusach Sphard is 100% identical to Ashkenaz. Do any nusach Sphard users actually daven that way?

  • Author
    Posts
Viewing 5 posts - 1 through 5 (of 5 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.