Popa's eggs mishmar shaila

Home Forums Decaffeinated Coffee Popa's eggs mishmar shaila

Viewing 24 posts - 1 through 24 (of 24 total)
  • Author
    Posts
  • #610170
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    I can’t find if I ever wrote this before, so here it is:

    I’m too lazy to look up the sourcing so I’ll write what I remember. Maybe I’ll add in the sourcing a different time.

    Blood spots. In eggs. There is a machlokes. One shitta is that if it is on the yolk it is assur. One shitta is that if it is on the white it is assur. (Something about a third shitta and a kesher.)

    We are machmir like all shittos. The consequence is that no matter where you find the blood spot it is assur.

    So:

    Suppose you crack an egg and see a blood spot–it is assur no matter where the blood is.

    Suppose you crack an egg and see a blood spot, and then mix that egg up with several other eggs–it is assur, no matter where the blood spot was.

    Suppose you crack several eggs and mix them together and then notice a blood spot–it is muttar because there is a safek that maybe it was in a spot that is muttar. Wait, what? But you just said that we are machmir that no matter where it is it is assur. So how does a safek help us? Both sides of the safek are assur!

    #969294
    TheGoq
    Participant

    Popa your cracking up.

    #969295
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Didn’t it become a safek d’rabbonon?

    #969296
    Sam2
    Participant

    There is no Mimah Nafshach. It’s not that every spot is Assur. It’s that we don’t know where the Assur spot is, so we treat all spots as Assur. But at the end of the day it might be Muttar. So if you see the blood spot you have a Safek in Din about whether this blood spot is Muttar or Assur, something that we are Machmir on. But if you don’t see the spot until later then the Safek is in Metzius, was the blood in a Muttar spot or not? (I feel like you’re leaving something out. I haven’t done this in many years but don’t you need a second Safek in order to make this Muttar?)

    #969297
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    Sam: you don’t need a second safek. The combined reason is that it is also batul b’rov. (And I’m guessing the blood is batul b’shishim, and the assur egg is min b’mino)

    #969298
    Sam2
    Participant

    PBA: Ah, that makes sense. It’s a D’rabannan so it’s S’feiko L’kula. My Chiluk doesn’t work for you though? We don’t know which is Assur so we treat each individual case as Assur. But at the end of the day it might have come from a Muttar spot. So if you don’t know what that spot is then as long as you have a way of Bittul you can use the Bittul.

    (The single egg with a blood sport itself is a Safek D’oraisa. And even if it was D’rabannan this would be analogous to the case of the 4 Kosos; see the Ran there in the last Perek of Pesachim.)

    #969299
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    The egg would have to be Batul Beshishim, not the blood.

    I didn’t learn through those Halachos, but to be Nosen Taam to what you describe we can say that once you had the Shaila on a whole egg and had to render it Traif, it is a Chaticha Asura and we aren’t Mattir Chad Betrei. On the other hand, when the Safek is born on the mix you can still ponder its Issur and add that to the Rov factor.

    #969300
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    I think I have a simpler answer

    #969301
    Sam2
    Participant

    HaLeiVi: No, because the egg is a Safek Issur because we never Paskened on the egg before it became mixed in.

    PBA: What was DY’s deleted answer from two years ago?

    #969302
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    What do you mean by that? When we had one whole egg in front of us we had to Pasken on it that it is Treif.

    #969303
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    My answer, and DY’s answer, is this:

    If you see where it is, and then it gets mixed in, then you know that there is one rishon which holds it is assur, so since we are machmir like both the raah and the rif/rambam, we are machmir and it is assur.

    But if you didn’t see where it was and then it gets mixed in–then both the rif/rambam and the raah themselves–would hold it is muttar. Because if you brought it to the raah, he would look at it, say it is a safek issur and in a taaruvos so it is muttur. And if you brought it to the rif or rambam, they would say the same. So yes, we are machmir like both shittos–but we are machmir m’safek like both shittos, not that we think that both are concurrently correct. So if according to both shittos it would be muttar, we also say it is muttar.

    What you think?

    #969304
    Sam2
    Participant

    I think we basically said the same thing. I just used fancier language and you were clearer. That makes perfect sense.

    #969305
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    That’s a great answer. I didn’t realize that it is definite in the first case that you know where it is. According to your Pshat, if you mix up this one egg, then notice a spot, and then it gets mixed with others it will also be fine.

    #969306
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    Sam: Yes, now that I re-read you, you did say the same thing.

    Haleivi: Yes, I’m pretty sure that is the halacha.

    #969307
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    Why indeed is Chaticha Asura not an issue? We don’t apply it to a Safek?

    #969308
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    I dunno. I’m waaaaaaaaaaaay to busy to look that up these days though.

    #969309

    Now that the original thread has been dug up, can we close either this one or that one?

    #969310
    HaLeiVi
    Participant

    They are now holding in middle of different discussions.

    #969311

    Okay, but it’s the same topic…why not just say what you have to say in one place?

    #969312
    popa_bar_abba
    Participant

    We have to say it in two places.

    #969313
    YW Moderator-42
    Moderator

    Perhaps misafek you should post in both places :).

    Popa, can you post the link to the other thread?

    #969314
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant
    #969315
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Now, a favor from you: if my post is still there, can you restore it (and note that it’s restored)? I’d like to see how I wrote my answer.

    done

    #969316
    ☕ DaasYochid ☕
    Participant

    Thanks.

Viewing 24 posts - 1 through 24 (of 24 total)
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.