Home › Forums › Decaffeinated Coffee › Popa is an ?? ????
- This topic has 23 replies, 7 voices, and was last updated 12 years, 6 months ago by popa_bar_abba.
-
AuthorPosts
-
April 22, 2012 2:30 am at 2:30 am #603016popa_bar_abbaParticipant
I am.
See, I was in this community for shabbos this week. And I show up to where I’m eating, and we are eating outside.
One problem: I don’t use the eruv, because the person who decides halacha for this eruv, is a Yeshivat Chovevei Torah grad, and I don’t trust him. I think they are not frum; they are not kosher for edus, their meat is treif, their wine is yayin nesech, their weddings are not weddings, their gerim are goyim, their gittin are posul. That is my opinion. So I don’t use the eruv.
So I didn’t know what to do. And I have never learned the sugyos of hotza’a.
So I’ve got this friend who was there. This friend learned for a number of years, and has smicha from some joint in Israel. And knows a lot. He also is no longer frum.
So my friend tells me that it is no problem, because the tables are big enough and high enough to be like the ?? in halacha (of which I knew nothing) and that you can carry on them. He tells me he is sure. So I sat down.
But then I was still uncomfortable, so I decided to go inside and look that up. But they don’t have a shmiras shabbos khilchosoh, and don’t have a mishna berura. They have a shulchan aruch.
So my friend comes in and tells me which siman, and meanwhile says he is more comfortable with the shulchan aruch harav (he was chabad) and is that good enough for me? I say yes.
So we find that halacha, but I’m still uncomfortable, because I’m not convinced the tables are big enough (they were round, and also it says they need to be 4×4 ??????? which is really 5 and a bit).
But then I find a bfeirush halacha that it is muttar to carry less than 4 amos in a reshus harabim (measured with your own 4 amos). And it is talking about exactly cases like this–that you are allowed to sit and eat. And move things around within your reach.
So I went back out and ate, and felt like an ?? ????, and decided I really need to learn chelek daled.
April 22, 2012 2:44 am at 2:44 am #871002squeakParticipantA man is known by the company he keeps
April 22, 2012 2:53 am at 2:53 am #871003midwesternerParticipantAccording to many poskim the rule of chatzi shiur assur min hatorah does not apply to daled amos birshus harabim. Daled amos is not a shiur of issur, but rather the definition of mekomo. If you move less than 4 amos, you have not moved it out of mekomo, so there is no issur.
If you are relying on the tables being a teil birshus harabim, you’d also need to make sure that you lean over the table every time you put something in your mouth, including the cup for drinking which is very difficult. It would also place you in the position of being over a drabanan of al yaamod birshus harabim v’yishte birshus hayachid shema yotzi.
If yeynam is yayin nesech, then how were you yotze kiddush? Bishlama Friday night, you could’ve used the pas. But Shabbos morning? Unless it wasn’t a YCT crowd, just a hashgacha on the eiruv. But if they rely on YCT for eiruvin, how can you trust their food?
April 22, 2012 3:01 am at 3:01 am #871004Sam2ParticipantPBA: While I can’t disagree with you if you want to say all of those things because YCT isn’t frum, it’s still very hard to call their wine Stam Yeinum. Unless you want to claim that it’s not that they’re not frum, it’s just that they’re all Apikorsim. That’s also tough to say, especially about the Talmidim (though it’s very easy to say about certain members of the staff).
Midwesterner: It could have been grape juice or Mevushal.
April 22, 2012 3:17 am at 3:17 am #871005yitayningwutParticipantI don’t think YCT isn’t frum.
April 22, 2012 3:19 am at 3:19 am #871006popa_bar_abbaParticipantIf yeynam is yayin nesech, then how were you yotze kiddush? Bishlama Friday night, you could’ve used the pas. But Shabbos morning? Unless it wasn’t a YCT crowd, just a hashgacha on the eiruv. But if they rely on YCT for eiruvin, how can you trust their food?
I was eating at chabad. He doesn’t use the eruv either. I don’t know why he was willing to have the event outside, since the food needed to be carried to the tables. (I wasn’t worried about m’leches shabbos on that score, since the eruv is possibly kosher, and it would only be a d’rabbanan anyway–we were in a reshus hayachid.)
Also, the wine was mevushal.
April 22, 2012 3:37 am at 3:37 am #871007Sam2ParticipantPBA: Also, there is good reason to say that something carried in not an Eruv isn’t Ma’aseh Shabbos because there was no change in the Guf of the object. (I’m noting a tremendous irony here, by the way. V’ahmeivin Yavin.)
April 22, 2012 3:40 am at 3:40 am #871008popa_bar_abbaParticipantSam: Unfortunately, I am not very fluent in the halachos of m’leches shabbos either.
(I’m noting a tremendous irony here, by the way. V’ahmeivin Yavin.)
If you meant that I’m complaining about them, while I didn’t know halacha myself–I started this thread to take flak, you know. And I know 100 times more than he does. And he isn’t frum because he is a kofer, not because he is ignorant.
April 22, 2012 3:49 am at 3:49 am #871009Sam2ParticipantPBA: Not the irony I was noting. But I won’t state anything more explicit here. And I think L’ma’aseh many say that Hotza’ah is Ma’aseh Shabbos. It’s a good Shaila in Lomdus though and there should be what to be Meikil on in a tremendous Sha’as Had’chak.
April 22, 2012 3:56 am at 3:56 am #871010popa_bar_abbaParticipantAha. But do they say that hotzaa which is only d’rabanan is m’leches shabbos? Do we say that any d’rabbanan is m’leches shabbos?
Is the irony that I trust chabad more than YCT?
April 22, 2012 4:02 am at 4:02 am #871011yitayningwutParticipantSam2 – Does your irony has anything to do with defining melachos as creative?
April 22, 2012 4:08 am at 4:08 am #871012Sam2ParticipantYitay: No, PBA got it. And even more than that, because a few of the YCT guys (some of whom are actually Frum) are some of the biggest anti-Chabad out there.
April 22, 2012 4:12 am at 4:12 am #871013yitayningwutParticipantOh.
April 22, 2012 4:12 am at 4:12 am #871014popa_bar_abbaParticipantI actually want to say something nice about chabad now.
In this particular community (which I have cause to be in often), it is really quite refreshing to go to chabad. I may not agree with them on many things, but they are unapologetically frum. He represents torah and the mesorah without feeling any need to equivocate or try to make it more acceptable to his audience. More like: this is torah, take it or leave it.
(although, they really could use a mishna berura)
April 22, 2012 7:05 am at 7:05 am #871015HaLeiViParticipantDid you speak to the Shliach? Perhaps he checked out the Eiruv on hos own, or he has his own Eiruv there.
What do you mean by ‘outside’? You say it was a Reshus Hayachis.
The tables have a problem of Gediim Bok’im Tachtav. I thought the Tal is only mentioned LeIssur. Where is it mentioned as a Hetter?
April 22, 2012 12:20 pm at 12:20 pm #871016popa_bar_abbaParticipantDid you speak to the Shliach? Perhaps he checked out the Eiruv on hos own, or he has his own Eiruv there.
I spoke to him.
What do you mean by ‘outside’? You say it was a Reshus Hayachis.
Like I said, I haven’t learned chelek daled. It was private property is what I’m saying.
The tables have a problem of Gediim Bok’im Tachtav. I thought the Tal is only mentioned LeIssur. Where is it mentioned as a Hetter?
I think it was the first siman.
April 22, 2012 5:24 pm at 5:24 pm #871017ItcheSrulikMemberIf you’re in a reshus hayachid, what exactly is the problem?
April 22, 2012 10:36 pm at 10:36 pm #871018popa_bar_abbaParticipantThere was no gate around it. We were in a driveway. You tell me what to call it.
April 22, 2012 11:33 pm at 11:33 pm #871019Sam2ParticipantPBA: That would be a Carmelis (unless it slopes far enough downwards, in which case things could get interesting).
April 22, 2012 11:45 pm at 11:45 pm #871020ItcheSrulikMemberIt’s a reshus hayachid in nezikin. In eruvin it’s some funky kind of a carm’lis. I was going to a shiur in the first perek of shabbos aliba d’hilchisa then college got in the way so I don’t know what to call it.
April 23, 2012 2:10 am at 2:10 am #871021popa_bar_abbaParticipantYes, I did not use “reshus hayachid” as the term of art. I used it simply to mean private property. I was aware that it had a different status because it was not fenced.
April 23, 2012 3:05 am at 3:05 am #871022HaLeiViParticipantWell, if it’s a driveway then it is closed on three sides. That is a Reshus Hayachid Mide’oraysa. It is a Mavoy, and Miderabanan it needs a Tikkun. Although a Lechi should be enough, the Poskim require a Tzuras Hapesach.
April 23, 2012 12:50 pm at 12:50 pm #871023ItcheSrulikMemberHaLeivi: In brooklyn we’re used to thinking of a driveway as a long narrow path enclosed on three sides. In places where there’s enough room to have landscapes and architecture that is not necessarily the case. Lots of large houses have round driveways so you can pull up at the front door and there is a yard in the center of the circle.
April 29, 2012 1:24 am at 1:24 am #871025popa_bar_abbaParticipantPopa is still an am haaretz.
Today at shul, I was the only ben torah there. There is usually a rav who davens there (there is no rav of the shul), but he didn’t come today.
So I’m thinking, if they have a shaila on the torah, they will probably ask me. But I don’t know the halachos, because I skipped them, because when would I ever have to know them?
??? ????, there was a shaila, so they called me over. I said, I don’t know these halachos, I never learned them.
But what else should we do? So I go over, and all the ink is scratched off from that letter, but the brownish mark is still there. So I say, I don’t know if this is good, I can try to look it up, but I may not find it so fast. So we put the torah away, because nobody knows (and take another one).
Then, I pull the yad yisroel, and find 143:25, and behold, it is a machlokes, and the mishna berura says to not put it away.
Oh well.
-
AuthorPosts
- You must be logged in to reply to this topic.