Search
Close this search box.

Senate Passes Health Care Reform Bill


health4.jpgThe Senate has passed an $871 billion health care reform bill.

Senators voted 60-39 shortly after 7 a.m. to pass the bill, the centerpiece of President Obama’s domestic agenda. Every member of the Democratic caucus backed the measure; every Republican opposed it.

The bill now moves to a conference committee to reconcile differences with the version passed by the House of Representatives.

The Senate health care bill cleared a third and final procedural hurdle Wednesday as Democrats successfully limited remaining debate time on the $871 billion measure.

That vote, also 60-39 along party lines, set up Thursday’s vote on final passage.

Democrats also turned back last-ditch motions from Republicans claiming various provisions in the bill, including a mandate that individuals purchase coverage, are unconstitutional.

“It’s long past time we declare health care a right and not a privilege,” Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, a Nevada Democrat, said after Wednesday’s vote.

“Today is a victory … for American families,” proclaimed Sen. Max Baucus, D-Montana. “Americans won.”

The victory for Obama comes after nearly a year of sharply polarized deliberations on Capitol Hill. Any measure passed by the Senate, however, will still have to be merged with a $1 trillion plan approved by the House of Representatives in November.

Increasingly confident Democrats hope to have a bill ready for Obama’s signature before his State of the Union address early next year.

“Health care reform is not a matter of if,” White House press secretary Robert Gibbs said Tuesday. “Health care reform now is a matter of when.”

If a combined House-Senate health care bill clears Congress and is signed by Obama, it would be the biggest expansion of federal health care guarantees since the enactment of Medicare and Medicaid over four decades ago.

Republicans have mounted a no-holds-barred legislative campaign against the bill, using a series of procedural maneuvers to slow debate while arguing that the measure will raise taxes while doing little to slow spiraling health care costs.

They’ve also ripped Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nevada, for garnering the 60 votes necessary to pass the bill in part by cobbling together a series of “sweetheart deals” for wavering members of the Democratic caucus.

“This bill is a grab bag of Chicago-style, backroom buyoffs,” Utah GOP Sen. Orrin Hatch said Wednesday.

Recent compromises made to win the backing of moderates such as Sen. Ben Nelson of Nebraska and Sen. Joe Lieberman of Connecticut also angered many liberal Democrats and threatened to undermine support for the bill.

Democrats have now held three key procedural votes on the health care bill this week. The backing of all 60 members of the Democratic caucus was required during each vote in order to overcome a filibuster from a GOP minority united in opposition.

Final passage of the measure, in contrast, will require only a bare majority in the 100-member chamber.

Enthusiastic top Democrats argue the Senate bill would constitute a positive change of historic proportions. The legislation, according to the nonpartisan Congressional Budget Office, would extend health insurance to more than 30 million Americans currently lacking coverage while reducing the federal deficit.

The House and Senate bills agree on a broad range of changes that could impact every American’s coverage.

Among other things, they have agreed to subsidize insurance for a family of four making up to roughly $88,000 annually, or 400 percent of the federal poverty level.

They also have agreed to create health insurance exchanges designed to make it easier for small businesses, the self-employed and the unemployed to pool resources and purchase less-expensive coverage. Both the House plan and the Senate bill would eventually limit total out-of-pocket expenses and prevent insurance companies from denying coverage for pre-existing conditions.

Insurers also would be barred from charging higher premiums based on a person’s gender or medical history. However, both bills allow insurance companies to charge higher premiums for older customers.

Medicaid would be significantly expanded under both proposals. The House bill would extend coverage to individuals earning up to 150 percent of the poverty line, or roughly $33,000 for a family of four; the Senate plan ensures coverage to those earning up to 133 percent of the poverty level, or just over $29,000 for a family of four.

Major differences between the bills will be the focus of the conference committee that will try to merge them. House and Senate Democrats are still divided over how to pay for their plans. They are also split on, among other things, language relating to abortion coverage and whether to include a government-run public health insurance option.

The House bill includes a public option; the more conservative Senate measure would instead create nonprofit private plans overseen by the federal government.

(Source: CNN)



10 Responses

  1. While the various proposals will help Orthodox Jews (having a high birth rate makes us into the sort of demographic insurance companies can’t stand), the bills doesn’t do much for the self-employed or small businesses, and does nothing to hold down costs, and is incredibly convoluted. It may be good for the Jews, but it probably isn’t good the country.

  2. akuperma, this bill is rotten for the Jews because the bulk of the cost cutting will be on Medicare beneficiaries who are the elderly Roshei Yeshiva. But, of course, as long as the young Jews are around to vote Democratic, who needs the elderly, right?!

  3. As a result of this ill conceived plan, the taxes of many people, including Orthdox Jews will skyrocket resulting in a substantial reduction in donations to moisdos HaTorah and tzdeka organizations, even more than they have been already. Is this health care legislation good for Orthodox Jwes? I don’t think so.

  4. What a trajedy –

    Imagine . . no more pre-existing condition restrictions; bye bye to my beloved annual coverage caps. Kollel families will be able to get insurance lawfully in their own name – sob sob – and no more glossy fliers from this tzedakah or that Gadol bewailing the uninsured family in need of funds to pay for medical needs.

    Woe is us – another left wing Democrat assault on our freedoms, another creeping intrusion of socialism, just like that horrible, anti-Torah medicare that the liberal commies forced on us 40 years ago.

    Oh my, my . . woe is us . . .the end of the world is nigh.

  5. #2- actually, Orthodox Jews are among the least affected by Medicare cutbacks. We have an incredibly with a much smaller percentage of “senior citizens” than most American communities. Part of this is due to a high birthrate, and part is due to the holocaust (a large part of the frum community that should now be 65 and older, i.e. born in 1945 and the preceeding years, didn’t survive the war).

    Also, Roshei yeshivos probably have fewer health problems than most (they tended to live modest lifestyles, walk a lot, and don’t overeat).

    Of course, cutting Medicare is dumb, and dumping Medicaid costs on states that are already broke is stupid, among other things.

    However given our high birthrate and the way insurance works in the US, the plan will be good for Orthodox Jews (even if it destroys the economy).

  6. inflation is not good for anyone. our basic needs will no longer be affordable. Medical panels will decide on our health and not poskim. How can this be truly good for anyone other than those who actually voted for it in the senate. Standards for healthcare are going down and that is terrible for all.

  7. akuperma, the plan will be rotten for Orthodox Jews. You have a long time ago shown that you will lie, manipulate, and twist your facts to try to maintain control over the Jewish vote. What you said about the Roshei Yeshiva is so incredulous that it is laughable. As far as the birthrate is concerned, it will go down because obstetricians will stop practicing and there will be higher infection rates along with longer waiting times. There will be a horrible doctor shortage because of the controls that will be placed on the medical community. I just read about it in today’s Wall Street Journal. But, you wouldn’t dare read that and you will twist the facts to maintain control over us. Feel better….

  8. Flatbush Bubby – Stop ranting and start thinking. Can you please bring an example of a time when akuperma has “shown that you will lie, manipulate, and twist your facts to try to maintain control over the Jewish vote”? As far as I see, akuperma’s tend to be very logical and fact-oriented, while yours tend to be more emotional and partisan. And since when does akuperma have “control over the Jewish vote”?

Leave a Reply


Popular Posts