Search
Close this search box.

Rubashkin Denied Bail Request


srubash3.jpgU.S. District Chief Judge Linda Reade Friday denied Sholom Rubashkin’s request he be let out of bail prior to his sentencing.

Reade said Rubashkin’s actions while he was free on bail, coupled with the jury’s verdict prove to be “powerful incentives” for him to flee. Rubashkin was arrested in November 2008 after authorities say he told employees to destroy financial documents related to a bank fraud scheme.

Reade acknowledged Rubashkin had wide support from the community, especially in Postville’s Jewish community, that he made a special effort to comply with his bail conditions and that he is committed to his family. But, she said, it wasn’t convincing enough to grant his release.

Meanwhile, his attorneys have asked that Rubashkin be aquitted or given a new trial. In a separate motion filed Thursday, Rubashkin’s attorneys argued there wasn’t enough evidence for a conviction.

Rubashkin is facing up to 1,255 years in prison. He is being held at the Woodbury County Jail pending sentencing.

(Source: WCF Courier)



12 Responses

  1. I agree with “Give Me a Break” — please, let them run after terrorists the way they run after Rubashkin. I’m not saying he’s innocent, but come on!!!!!! The punishment should fit the crime. Our government is so worried about being “politically correct” which is why we are such easy targets for terrorists. I don’t think Rubashkin is going to blow anyone away or skip town.

  2. What Nonsense… If Judge wasn’t so Anti-Semitic, She could give bail on the condition they take his passport and put a ankle tracking device.

  3. 150 or 1,255 years in prison, what’s the nafka mina? He’s 50 years old now. A twenty or thirty year sentence is the end of the story for him.

  4. The bottom line is, a women judge always reacts harsher. The same goes for women police. They always have to show that they will not let off anyone easy to prove that they are not weak. The judge in the OJ case was a male one and look what happened there!

  5. HASHEM YARACHEIM THE EIBSHTER RUNS THE WORLD AND HRAV S RUBASHKIN WHO IS INNOCENT ON MOST OFFENCES WILL NOT GET WHAT THE COURT WANTS TO GIVE HIM BUT WHAT THE EIBSHTER WANTS AND IF WE DAVEN WELL HOPEFULLY THAT WILL BE NOTHING

  6. Don’t worry folks! There is an Eye that sees and an Ear that hears. Hashem is watching! The tzaros and bizyonos that they are putting this ba’al tzedaka through is unforgiveable! But don’t worry! Hashem will punish those responsible for this!!

  7. So sad! Why doesn’t someone find something to bring the judge up upon! There’s no way she can be acting according to the law of this land! Land her up in jail! Meezerah Amalek, no doubt!

  8. #3 – Believe it or not, not everyone who does something you don’t agree with is an anti-semite. Do you have any proof to this claim?

    #6 – Wow is that a controversial comment. Do you have any figures to back this claim up?

  9. #12- How about denying him bail. All she had to do is take either his passport or put ankle bracelet tracking device on him. But chose not too. So how do you explain that? justice?

  10. # 12, I actually do have personal claims to back it up. The last 2 times I was in a car that got pulled over by a female officer, the driver rcieved a ticket. There was no compromise. The exact opposite has happened when the officer was male.

Leave a Reply


Popular Posts