After a devastating loss in the 2012 presidential election, the Republican Party entered a period of intense self-reflection and emerged with a firm promise to learn from its mistakes.
The GOP vowed to avoid a prolonged and vicious 2016 primary. It concluded it must embrace an overhaul of the nation’s immigration laws and adopt a more welcoming tone to win over women and minorities.
Yet a year from Election Day 2016, the GOP primary is a rough and bumpy competition. More than a dozen candidates are fighting for the support of voters — and skirmishing among themselves over the process of picking the nominee. And there are few signs the candidates are committed to expanding the party’s appeal beyond its conservative base.
“For Republicans, a free-for-all is good — I guess,” says Steve Duprey, a Republican National Committeeman from New Hampshire. “We always anticipated a vigorous contest, but I never anticipated 16 candidates.”
Meanwhile, there’s no such drama among Democrats. The party appears to be coalescing behind front-runner Hillary Rodham Clinton, who is building a campaign operation aimed at turning out the general election voters who catapulted Barack Obama to the White House.
The GOP’s challenges were on display Monday, as bickering continued among campaigns about upcoming debates. That’s an issue the GOP thought it had resolved, having spent years retooling its primary process after officials said it left 2012 nominee Mitt Romney bloodied heading into the general election.
Members of both parties say the GOP’s White House hopefuls have also ignored the recommendation from the RNC’s self-study that insisted Republicans must improve the party’s appeal among women and minorities.
“Devastatingly, we have lost the ability to be persuasive with, or welcoming to, those who do not agree with us on every issue,” the report found. In addition to an improved tone, the RNC outlined a single policy imperative: “We must embrace and champion comprehensive immigration reform. If we do not, our party’s appeal will continue to shrink to its core constituencies only.”
After a bipartisan group of senators failed to turn immigration legislation into law, Republicans on the campaign trail — including those involved with that effort — have moved sharply in the other direction. Almost the entire GOP field now calls first and foremost for increased security along the Mexican border.
Some, including front-runner Donald Trump, want to deport the estimated 11 million immigrants in the country illegally — a policy prescription experts suggest would be difficult if not impossible to achieve.
Incoming House Speaker Paul Ryan said over the weekend there would be no immigration bill until 2017, at the earliest. But Trump, who has infuriated Latinos by describing Mexican immigrants as rapists and criminals, keeps the topic front-and-center in the race.
“There have been moments that have been a little painful,” says Henry Barbour, an author of the RNC’s postelection report and a Republican National Committeeman from Mississippi. “We have to nominate a candidate who can win — someone who can grow our party instead of making it smaller.”
Absent a clear front-runner of their own, Republicans are trying to rally around their opposition to Clinton — amid signs that she’s getting stronger.
Commanding performances in the first primary debate and during 11 hours of testimony before a Republican-led congressional committee reassured many Democrats who’d feared the controversy over her use of a private email server as secretary of state could harm her campaign.
Her poll numbers have rebounded from a summer slump, and she now holds a wide lead nationally over Vermont independent Sen. Bernie Sanders.
The relatively clear Democratic field has allowed her team to focus a full year before Election Day on building the kind of operation that can carry her beyond the primary contests. She currently employs 511 staffers across the country — close to the number of staff on all the Republican campaigns combined.
And fundraising reports show an energized Democratic Party, with Clinton and Sanders together raising only slightly less than 15 candidates on the Republican side combined. The two top Democrats had roughly the same amount in the bank at the beginning of October as all the Republicans.
Clinton aides say that they budgeted for a high level of spending early in the campaign, and that the team is making important investments in data analytics, digital infrastructure and organizing that will help in both the primaries and the general election.
Few, if any, Republican campaigns have made such investments, although the Republican National Committee has expanded its digital operation.
Still, with two Senate committees and the FBI investigating Clinton’s email arrangement, that issue could re-emerge. And an unpredictable Democratic primary electorate, which has moved to the left during President Barack Obama’s administration, leaves Clinton and her team cautious about their prospects.
“I once made the mistake of thinking we could talk about these kinds of things before a single vote was cast,” said former Vermont Gov. Howard Dean, a Clinton supporter. “Anything could happen still. This is a presidential campaign. You have no idea what may be waiting in the wings.”
(AP)
4 Responses
So glad you could publish the DNC’s and the GOP-Establishments joint talking points on handing the election to Hillary.
“the RNC outlined a single policy imperative: “We must embrace and champion comprehensive immigration reform. If we do not, our party’s appeal will continue to shrink to its core constituencies only.”
DO THE MATH. If you amnesty millions Mexicans and Muslims, they will VOTE DEMOCRAT and the DEMs will take both houses and he White House FOREVER.
Most Americans do NOT want millions of illegals amnestied nor the country filled with more immigrants while REAL UNEMPLOYMENT is so high.
Actually, the Reppublican field has narrowed down to four candidates (Carson, Trump, Rubio and Cruz). The four have distinct styles and slightly distinct ideologies.
How as 2012 especially devastating, considering that it is very rare for a president to be defeated for reelection? It’s not like anyone was placing their hopes and dreams on Mitt Romney.
This is foolishness!
We’re a year from the general election and three months from the Hawkeye Cauci. It’s perfectly fine not to have a candidate lined up and ready to win the election.
I am not concerned because I know, barring any fraud by the democrats, the Republican WILL win and ANY Republican is better than Sir Hillary Rotten Clinton!
Mark Levin:
1. Hillary would be “Dame” not “Sir”.
2. Her attitudes suggest inheritance (nobility), rather than knighthood (which usually reflected merit), so perhaps a title such as “Lady…” would have been more appropriate. In all fairness, trying to be more “posh” than the Brits is widespread (Bushes, Cuomos, Kennedy, Browns of California, Paul the second, etc.). If you want someone who made it on their own, there are plenty of non-yichus candidates running.