By Rabbi Yair Hoffman for the Five Towns Jewish Times
Walk into Gourmet Glatt and you will find an entire refrigerator row of just one item – dips. Prominent among these dips, of course, is olive dip. Some prefer the Flaum’s dip, some like the other brands. But regardless, for some reason, olive dips have become ubiquitous at the Shabbos table. But all this dipping brings up a few halachic questions.
The Gemorah (Horios 13b) lists five things that cause one to forget ones studies: Eating from mouse and cat leftovers, eating the heart of an animal (the Afarkasta D’Anya of Rabbi Klonymus Sperber extends this to chickens too), if one regularly consumes olives, if one drinks leftover bathwater, and washing feet one on top of the other. A sixth item is listed as a possibility – using one’s clothing as a pillow.
The Gemorah later lists five things that restore one’s studies. One of them is consuming olive oil. The Mogain Avrohom 170:19 cites this Gemorah as authoritative Halacha. The Aruch HaShulchan 2:5, the HaGaos Rabbi Akiva Eiger (OC 2), Shla, Ben Ish Chai, and Kaf HaChaim mention it as well.
Why then are so many people eating olives? Should olives not be served? What about the dips? Are there heterim – reasons to allow the masses to ignore this “mandatory avoiding” of Chazal? And how do we give a hechsher on the item without, say, adding a bit of olive oil? Is there a difference between green olives and black olives? What about that olive spread – growing weekly in popularity?
Guilt forces one to look for answers.
So here we go.
The Yaavatz in his Hagaos to that very Gemorah writes that the Talmud only refers to raw olives – but if the olives are marinated there is nothing wrong. Our olives, of course, are marinated.
Why? Because when eaten raw, olives are extremely bitter – in fact, they are almost completely inedible. They contain a substance called “oleuropein” which causes the bitterness. In order to remove this substance, the olives need to be cured by submerging them in salt, brine, or lye.
But the Yaavetz’s ruling is perplexing for a number of other reasons. Firstly, where does he get it from? Secondly, why is there no mention of it in the Talmud? Botanists have shown that many of the olive trees that are still around in the middle –east are between 1500 and 2000 years old – these were always consumed marinated – why then does the Gemorah not qualify it?
Also, how come none of the Poskim cite the Yaavetz? In his Mor UKetziya he does cite a number of instances where Rabbis did eat salted olives – for example Rabbi Yochanan in Brachos 38b. It could be that this is his source and that the Gemorah does not distinguish the two forms of olives, raw or marinated, because it was an obvious truth. Now, of course, it is not so obvious. The Meiri on Horios, however, writes that salted olives also cause one to forget ones studies.
Clearly, using the Yaavetz alone will not suffice, unless one assumes that there was a type of olive that had less oleuropein, but there is no evidence to this.
Rabbi Yoseph Chaim Sonenfeld (Salmas Chaim Vol. I #41) writes that if one consumes it with olive oil there is no problem. This solution is indicated in the rest of the Gemorah where it seems that the olive oil consumption makes up for the olive consumption. Which brings us to the next few questions – how much olive oil covers how many olives? Also, will the olive oil in the salad dressing be considered good enough to count as olive oil? Do they really add olive oil to the olive dip? And is it only olive oil – or will another oil do?
All these questions, of course, bring us to another question too. Is the Gemorah informing us of a scientific truth – or is it something to do with Torah and purity and impurity? Is it Halacha or is it just good advice?
Also what does it cause you to forget? Does it cause one to forget secular knowledge too? Should the secular college professors be warned?
Addressing this latter question, we may make the following inference. The Mogain Avrohom (OC 170:19) cited earlier differentiates between when one eats them with intent – where one does not forget ones learning and a case where one eats them casually where one does forget one’s studies. The issue of intent seems to indicate that what is being discussed is an issue of impurity or purity rather than a scientific issue – because intent would have no impact on things otherwise. This is also borne out by the fact that the scientific record does not record any repercussions of forgetting things when one consumes olives. Thus the secular college professors and their knowledge are safe.
Is it Halacha or just good advice? Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach zatzal is cited in the Halichos Shlomo that it is not absolute halacha – just good advice. For these items we also do not apply the principle of “dangers are more stringent than prohibitions” either. Nonetheless, though, it still remains good advice.
As far as how much oil covers how much olives – Rav Shlomo Zalman Auerbach zatzal also indicated that any amount would suffice. This too is found in the Halichos Shlomo. There is no indication, however, that another oil is effective. Would the olive oil in the salad dressing work? One may apply the principle of Achshavei since olive oil is much more expensive than other types of oil – so it would still be considered extant – even in a mixture with other products.
Another angle might lie in the very wording of the Talmud itself. If one regularly consumes olives – indicates that one may consume them and one would remain unaffected – it is just regular and habitual consumption that causes one to lose ones studies. So perhaps another leniency might be if we only occasionally consume these olives. The Otzer HaTeshuvos (R. S.D. Klein 118:4) quotes Rav Chaim Kanievsky Shlita who cites the Talmud Brachos 40a regarding lentils that if one consumes them once in thirty days that is called regular consumption. Rav Kanievsky Shlita rules that if it is longer than once in thirty days then that is not considered regular consumption.
In summation then, we have the following three leniencies: [1] If one adds any dressing containing olive oil or even a bit of olive oil to it then it would be permitted. [2] Some authorities rule that the fact that the olives are marinated is a significant leniency in and of itself. [3] If we do not make it a habit of having it every time that might be considered irregular. The fact that it is good advice can also combine with the above factors to create a leniency too.
There is one caveat. Do not make the mistake that this author made. As an experiment, we put olive oil in the jar of olives just to address the issue beforehand. The results were pretty ugly. The resultant mixture looked as if they olives had spoiled. They didn’t, but it was not a very appealing result.
May Hashem allow us not only to retain our past Torah knowledge – but to ever increase our acquisition of it too.
The author may be reached at [email protected]
7 Responses
I will quote from Rav Ovadia via Halacha Yomit on this matter as a contribution to this subject.
” In cases like these, we have a great rule that whenever there is a disagreement among the Acharonim, if we find any one of the Rishonim who discusses this issue, his words will act as the deciding factor, for the Rishonim were greater than the Acharonim.
Indeed, Rabbeinu Yehuda Ha’Chassid (one of the great Rishonim) writes as follows in his Sefer Chassidim: “An individual once asked a scholar if he was permitted to eat a loaf of bread which a mouse had eaten from (about which the Gemara in Masechet Horayot states that eating from such bread causes one to forget). The scholar asked, ‘Why would you not eat it?’ The man replied, ‘I am afraid that I will forget my Torah learning and I am usually careful not to eat things which cause one to forget but I am hungry now.’ The scholar answered, ‘You need not abstain from eating this bread since the Mishnah in Avot states that one is not liable for forgetting the Torah until one actually sits and purposely makes himself forget (however, in this instance, one would not be liable, for one is not certainly and advertently causing himself to forget). Nevertheless, I see that you are empty and waste your valuable time on anything but Torah study so it would be better for you not be as careful from eating foods that cause forgetfulness so that you indeed forget all of the futile things you are involved with.’” Based on this, Maran Rabbeinu Ovadia Yosef zt”l rules on the aforementioned disagreement between the Acharonim and writes that it is certainly preferable to abstain from eating such foods; however, there is no actual prohibition to do so”
Generally speaking, anything that is mentioned in the Gemorah about eating foods, is not to be regarded at this time as valid. These are not halachic rulings. Those were warnings for that time specifically. Although not mixing fish and meat has pretty much become a halachic prohibition, we don’t see non-jews becoming leprous from surf and turf meals. Even as respected as the Will of Rav Yehuda is, most of those items are completely ignored. Most poskim of the past 100 years don’t give any credence to them by stating that his will was only for his family, not for klal yisroel.
Rabbi Hoffman, with all due respect, save your articles for better things than olive dips.
Harav Rabbi Weissmandel from Monsey paskend that today’s olives you don’t need to add olive oil and the brocha is שהכל since they take out the maximum possible oil from the olive and it doesn’t taste as the original olive
I think if you try hard enough you can find a halacha to ban anything. Please stop this over the top Charedia non-sense. I am moving to Ramat Beit Shemesh Alef in a few weeks. At the rate things are going I am going so turned off instead of eating olives I think I’ll have chicken parmesan and call it a day.
BTMODAD you are so right. A new ban on something comes out every week. There is a Rabbeinu Tam in a Tosafos in Mesechta Beitza where he states – “I don’t know from where they get their new chumras. I didn’t see any of these at my grandfathers (Rashi). These chumras are turning off not only BTs but also many frum from birth Jews who feel that these rabbis are doing this just to enhance their own reputations. But don’t worry. It won’t stop. So yeah let’s all go have some veal parm. It’s the only dish left that is truly ossur.
The fact that this is a discussion of the minute possibility that eating olives might be prohibited based on a line in a gemara that is almost definitely not meant halakhically, and not about the documented fact that Flaum’s, who are specifically noted in the article with a picture that might as well be an ad, exploits its workers and violates an issur d’oraysa of paying fairly and on time, seems to me to be a fundamental misordering of priorities.
I wonder whether it is the specific behavior (e.g. eating olives) or something that behavior represented that the Rabbis were actually concerned about.