The chairman of the House committee investigating the 2012 attacks in Benghazi, Libya, said Thursday that he can’t set a date for Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Rodham Clinton to testify before his panel because the State Department has been slow in producing needed documents.
In a letter Thursday to Secretary of State John Kerry, Rep. Trey Gowdy, R-S.C., complained that the department has delayed providing emails and other documents involving Clinton, a former secretary of state.
“Simply put, the committee must have the records of communication requested more than six months ago before the secretary’s appearance can be scheduled,” Gowdy wrote.
Gowdy had initially called for Clinton to testify next week on the attacks that killed four Americans, including the U.S. ambassador to Libya, but he told Kerry that no longer appears possible.
Democrats have complained that Gowdy and other Republicans are drawing out the Benghazi hearings in order to disrupt Clinton’s presidential campaign, but Gowdy said the State Department is to blame for any delays. The committee must have a complete record before lawmakers can effectively question Clinton, Gowdy said.
“The only thing standing between the committee and the former secretary being able to discuss her tenure as secretary of state as it relates to Libya and Benghazi is the Department of State’s failure, in more than half a year, to produce a single, solitary email responsive to our request and subpoena,” Gowdy wrote.
To underline the seriousness of his complaint, Gowdy told Kerry that the committee has “shared it concerns” with lawmakers responsible for the agency’s budget “in the event reprogramming” of some department spending is needed to ensure compliance with the committee’s request.
(AP)
2 Responses
they can’t produce the emails because they are too bloody.
Not being a politician, just an innocent citizen, I see this stalling by the State Department as a fatal blow to Clinton (which I relish). It seems that the documents, if produced, would reflect the neglect, if not outright abuse, by the highest levels of the State Department. Thus, keeping this evidence away from Gowdy & committee seems a good approach. However, this hiding of the evidence itself proves her guilt and unprofessionalism, and that would seal her fate for me as a candidate.
P.S. – Can’t Gowdy run for President? I’d vote for him for sure.