Search
Close this search box.

PM’s Statement Seeking to Calm the Disagreement Surrounding Congressional Address


bibThere is much to be said in the US and international media regarding Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu’s planned congressional address, which has the White House up in arms. In Israel, the left and right-wing politicians are duking it out with each warning the other of the dire consequences of their position.

On Capitol Hill the democrats are beginning to flex their political muscle, threatening with a boycott of the event. The White House has stepped up its rhetoric and is now threatening to “reevaluate” financial aid to Israel. When nothing else works, it always comes down to the checkbook.

Meantime, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu is now showing any signs of changing his mind, despite the mounting pressure. Mr. Netanyahu released the following statement on Tuesday, 21 Shevat, acknowledging the disagreement between Israel and the US administration. “First, on behalf of the people of Israel, I wish to send condolences to President Obama, the American people and the family of Kayla Mueller. We stand with you.

“Israel’s survival is not a partisan issue, not in Israel nor in the United States.

“This doesn’t mean that from time to time Israeli governments have not had serious disagreements with American administrations over the best way to achieve the security of Israel.

“Israel’s first Prime Minister, David Ben-Gurion, declared Israel’s independence in the face of strong opposition from US Secretary of State George Marshall. Likewise, Prime Minister Eshkol’s decisions at the start of the Six Day War, Prime Minister Begin’s decision regarding the nuclear reactor in Iraq, and Prime Minister Sharon’s decisions to press ahead with Operation Defensive Shield; these were all strongly opposed at the time by American administrations.

“Disagreements over Israel’s security have occurred between prime ministers in Israel from the left and from the right and American presidents from both parties.

“None of these disagreements led to a rupture in the relationship between Israel and the United States.

“In fact, over time, our relationship grew stronger.

“But we do have today a profound disagreement with the United States administration and the rest of the P5+1 over the offer that has been made to Iran.

“This offer would enable Iran to threaten Israel’s survival.

“This is a regime, Iran, that is openly committed to Israel’s destruction. It would be able, under this deal, to break out to a nuclear weapon in a short time, and within a few years, to have the industrial capability to produce many nuclear bombs for the goal of our destruction.

“This is not a personal disagreement between President Obama and me. I deeply appreciate all that he has done for Israel in many fields. Equally, I know that the President appreciates my responsibility, my foremost responsibility, to protect and defend the security of Israel.

“I am going to the United States not because I seek a confrontation with the President, but because I must fulfil my obligation to speak up on a matter that affects the very survival of my country.

“I intend to speak about this issue before the March 24th deadline and I intend to speak in the US Congress because Congress might have an important role on a nuclear deal with Iran.

Thank you.”

(YWN – Israel Desk, Jerusalem)



3 Responses

  1. Israel would have more credibility if on such trips the opposition leader accompanied the Prime Minister. Entangling American and Israeli partisan politics does no one any good, with the possible exception of the Iranians and Islamic State – and neither the American nor Israeli leadership want to help either of them.

  2. I’m going to be completely honest. Whoever typed up this article needs to stay far away from journalism. Everything about it is poor. The way the quotes are typed is horrible. Also, many people who glance at this article are going to think that Netanyahu is considering canceling his speech. “Meantime, Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu is now showing any signs of changing his mind, despite the mounting pressure.” Does anyone else see what is wrong with that??

Leave a Reply


Popular Posts