yankel berel, your post on the history and the mood of the times of the Ramban’s debate (Btw I apologise for saying it was the King of Seville. I don’t know where I got Seville from.) is very nice, but your conclusion that WE MUST SAY that Daniel is different to the others because he didn’t start the process – something which the Ramban does not mention at all – is far-fetched and certainly cannot be proven to the extent that you take it as fact.
Menu