CS in reply to my question as to how the LR could claim that his father-in-law was Mashiach when his father-in-law wasn’t dor shevi’i, and Mashiach has to be from dor Shevi’i: “I don’t see where you got that. What I meant was that if Nesius would’ve ended with the Frierdiker Rebbe, there would have been no dor shvii as the dor goes by the Rebbe. Since we needed another Rebbe, that equals dor shvii”
Sounds like circular reasoning to me. The Rayatz could have been Mashiach, but since he wasn’t we need dor shevi’i to be Mashiach, and that just happens to be the LR who is the one who revealed the need for dor shevi’i.
Well done! Once again you have shown how we have no option but to declare the LR as Mashiach because he said so!