@Cs
CS is claiming to their best to be honest .
SO – lets start with the details already brought up –
1] Official Habad claimed their leader as Navi Emet because he predicted no one will be hurt in First Gulf War in EY .
True/False
2] Fact is that people were hurt . Fact is that people died [directly and indirectly].
True/False
3] Rambam says clearly that if a candidate Navi predicts future and even one small detail is incorrect , we know for a fact that he is Navi Sheker and he is sentenced to death.
True/ False
Please answer the above 3 questions in a clear manner
and your honest opinion plus well reasoned thinking behind your answers re the above and the following:
A] is he a Navi Emet [about who the Torah commands [not merely advocates- but commands] Elav Tishma’un and whoever transgresses his words is hayav mitah biyedei shamayim al pi hahalaha ?
Meaning the overwhelming majority of Klal Yisrael who ignore his words are Hayavim Mitah Biyede Shamayim [ChvSh] ?
Or
B] He is a Navi Sheker – Meaning that that he is Hayav Mitah BeBeth Din and that he should be kavur bein harsha’im who are hayavei mitah [chvsh] ?
Or
C] He is neither – not a Navi emet nor a Navi Sheker and no one is hayav mitah , not him and not the majority of Klal Yisrael ?
Please , honest and WELL REASONED answers – for BOTH 1,2 and 3 , AND , A, B and C.
THanks