Search
Close this search box.

Anti-Islam Populist Wilders Heading For Massive Win In Netherlands


The far-right, anti-Islam populist Geert Wilders was headed for a massive parliamentary election victory Wednesday in one of the biggest political upsets in Dutch politics since World War II, and one that is bound to send shockwaves through Europe.

That puts him in line to lead talks to form a new ruling coalition and possibly become the country’s first hard-right prime minister at a time of political upheaval through much of the continent.

The exit poll published by national broadcaster NOS said that Wilders’ Party for Freedom won 35 seats in the 150-seat lower house of parliament, more than double the 17 he won at the last election. Final official results were only expected on Thursday.

“I had to pinch my arm,” a jubilant Wilders said.

Wilders’ election program includes calls for a referendum on the Netherlands leaving the European Union, a total halt to accepting asylum-seekers and migrant pushbacks at Dutch borders.

It also advocates the “de-Islamization” of the Netherlands, although he has been milder about Islam during this election campaign than in the past.

“Voters said, ‘We are sick of it. Sick to our stomachs’,” he said, adding he was now on a mission to end the “asylum tsunami,” referring to the migration issue that came to dominate his campaign.

“The Dutch will be No. 1 again,” Wilders added. “The people must get their nation back.”

But the lawmaker, who has in the past been labeled a Dutch version of Donald Trump, first would have to form a coalition government before he can take the reins of power.

That will be tough as mainstream parties are reluctant to join forces with him and his party, but the size of his victory strengthens his hand in any negotiations.

Wilders called on other parties to constructively engage in coalition talks. Pieter Omtzigt, a former centrist Christian Democrat who built his own New Social Contract party in three months to take an estimated 20 seats, said he would always be open to talks.

The closest party to Wilders’ one was an alliance of the center-left Labor Party and Green Left, which was forecast to win 26 seats. But its leader Frans Timmermans made clear that Wilders should not count on a coalition with him.

Despite his harsh rhetoric, Wilders was already courting other right and center parties by saying that whatever he would do, “it would be within the law and constitution.”

The historic victory came one year after the win of Italian Premier Giorgia Meloni, whose Brothers of Italy’s roots were steeped in nostalgia for fascist dictator Benito Mussolini. Meloni has since mellowed her stance on several issues and has become the acceptable face of the hard right in the EU.

Wilders was long a firebrand lashing out at Islam, at the EU and migrants — a stance which brought him close to power but never in it in a nation known for compromise politics.

Hungarian Prime Minister Viktor Orban, who boasts of turning Hungary into an “illiberal” state and has similarly harsh stances on migration and EU institutions, was quick to congratulate Wilders. “The winds of change are here! Congratulations,” Orban said.

During the final weeks of his campaign, Wilders somewhat softened his stance and vowed that he would be a prime minister for all Dutch people, so much so that he gained the moniker Geert “Milders.”

The exit poll was published as voting ended in the general election. It can have a margin of error of up to three seats but generally is accurate within one or two seats, said Ipsos, which was involved in the poll.

The election was called after the fourth and final coalition of outgoing Prime Minister Mark Rutte resigned in July after failing to agree to measures to rein in migration.

Rutte was replaced by Dilan Yeşilgöz-Zegerius, a former refugee from Turkey who could have become the country’s first female prime minister had her party won the most votes. Instead, it was forecast to lose 11 seats to end up with 23.

The election had been called a neck-and-neck race, but in the end Wilders handily beat all opponents.

The result is the latest in a series of elections that is altering the European political landscape. From Slovakia and Spain, to Germany and Poland, populist and hard-right parties triumphed in some EU member nations and faltered in others.

(AP)



6 Responses

  1. Just to note, as is evident in his autobiography (marked for death) he is not at all far right in the traditional sense of the word. On social issues he stands staunchly with the progressive left, and in fact one of his core issues that he has with immigrants is that they oppose and not adopt Europe’s decaying moral standards, which he feels threatens their way of life. As an aside his opposition to Muslims has caused him to be staunchly pro Israel, a country which he views as in the front lines of a battle in upholding (his version of) western culture against Muslim primitivesm, sadly a truthful description of the Zionist shmad state.

  2. Unfortunately the headline is a bit misleading, since there doesn’t seem to be any way for him to become prime minister. Too many other parties will refuse to join him. But it will be difficult to put together a coalition without him, so at least he will finally get a seat at the table, and have his views matter, so that’s good.

  3. There is not really very much room to maneuver for the other parties without wholly disregarding the will of the people. Holland prides itself on being a real democracy and the politicians who are leading the other parties can now not go around Wilders without loosing face.
    One more point on populism and extreme right. As mentioned before, Wilders is definitely not a classic right wing extremist. He could be regarded almost leftist when it comes to economic politics.
    Though he is very pro-Zionist, he is extremely anti religion and anti religious education of any kind. His love for Israel stems from the fact that he views the difficulties that Israel face with Islam and Arabs as the proto fight against Islam which in the end will threaten the western world. Some of the laws which he would have aimed against Moslims would also hit Jewish people. He would forbid in a town where he became the biggest in the city council about ten years ago, not just a burka, but any religious covering of heads by women, that would include a snood and the like.

  4. He did very well (I suspect Hamas might be to blame, they gave the “left” a bad name, and Nazi-style activities are not likely to go over well in Netherlands), but he hardly won. His situation would be similar to Likud’s if there no no parties to his right. It would be more similar to, with a similar system, the Hareidim or the nationalist parties to Likud got 30 seats, but without coalition partners they would never get the majority needed to form a government.

Leave a Reply


Popular Posts