Search
Close this search box.

Artist Who Submitted Empty Frames As Artwork Appeals Court Ruling To Return Payment


A Danish artist who was given a pile of cash by a museum in northern Denmark to create a piece for its exhibition on labor conditions two years ago submitted two empty canvases — titled “Take the Money and Run.” The exhibit caused a stir.

A Danish court ruled last week that Jens Haaning has to repay 492,549 kroner ($69,894 ) to Kunsten Museum in Aalborg for having violated his contract. His lawyer, Peter Schønning, said Wednesday that the contemporary artist is appealing the ruling and declined further comment.

The museum had commissioned Haaning in 2021 to recreate two of his earlier pieces featuring bank notes attached to canvases representing the average annual wage in Denmark and Austria.

Instead, he submitted two empty canvases for the exhibition, entitled “Work It Out,” said the artwork represented his current work situation and kept the money.

Along with giving him the money in euro and kroner banknotes for the art pieces, the museum also paid him 25,000 kroner ($3,900) for his labor in creating the artwork.

In its Sept. 18 ruling, the District Court of Copenhagen also decided that Haaning can keep 40,000 kroner ($5,676) from the original amount given to him by the museum, which should constitute an artist’s fee because the exhibition, held from Sept. 24, 2021 to Jan. 16, 2022, went ahead with the empty frames.

The court said that the contract between the museum and Haaning had stated that the cash — the banknotes given to Haaning — would be available during the temporary display of the works, and that it was to be returned afterward.

When Haaning refused to return the cash after the exhibition ended, the museum took legal action.

Haaning has denied having committed a crime and insists he did produce a work of art.

(AP)



2 Responses

  1. Aw come on..!! Can’t you see what this is??

    This the height if expression. That’s what Art is all about!!

    It took hours upon hours of deep pondering. Exhausting work!!

    This is actually a very valuable piece of art.

    Anyone who says otherwise must be a capitalist bigot!!

  2. What a chutzpah. The court gave him everything he could possibly have asked for; it gave him the normal fee for creating a work of art, and also for his non-existent “labor”. All it demanded of him was that he fulfill his contract to return the banknotes which were the raw material the museum supplied for him to use in the art work (which he didn’t even use) and which he had agreed to return afterwards. On what grounds could he possibly keep those?

Leave a Reply


Popular Posts