Reply To: Question of an ignorant, closed-minded Lubavitcher

@nomesorah
original statement
C] their rebbi used references to his father in law to indirectly get messages across how others should be regarding himself.
———–
nomesorah
C] Possible. Again, I can’t tell for myself. You are entitled to your opinion. But I don’t see it as proof to the larger debate. It is interesting to me, that those that are obsessed with The Rebbe and those that are against him, agree on this. Those of us in the middle, aren’t so sure.
————–
C response] Here I am baffled. Those ‘obsessed with their rebbe’ understand what he wanted . Those ‘in the middle’ are not sure .
1] Have you read the relevant comments ?
2] If he did not use his father in law as a vehicle to influence the hasidim in re to himself – then how come that habad hasidim relate to their rebbi fundamentally different to all other groups ?
Coincidence ?
3] Again -those ‘obsessed’ , understood the message . The results are there , and the cause , not ?
My experience has shown that results do have a cause .
4] In all other habad activities their rebbi gets the credit , Just here not ? Bizarre.