“Why do you see new laws as a possible threat to freedom?”
Generally, by definition, a law restricts one from doing something, meaning you are no longer free to do that thing. Seems pretty pashut.
“This is the actually the first time I’ve seen anyone argue in favor of the supreme court with an argument that borders on anarchy.”
Doesn’t seem like it should be such a stretch. The whole point of judicial branch is the curb government overreach. It seems like it was only a few years back when that was considered a conservative ideal. Now I guess anyone who isn’t pro-authoritarian is an anarchist.
“They strike down a law based on a “reasonableness” standard.”
That’s pretty stupid; they should have a constitution. Is that what these reforms would seek to do?