Reply To: Groff v Dejoy

Home Forums Decaffeinated Coffee Groff v Dejoy Reply To: Groff v Dejoy

#2182434
akuperma
Participant

A precedent would not be that significant since the employer (defendant/appellant) is the Federal government, which is not merely subject the the employment discrimination laws, but is also subject to a constitutional prohibition against “religious tests” as a condition of employment.