Stacy Abrams is not BLM . Nor a communist.
Not every african american democrat is a BLM communist.
She does not need the benefit of the doubt because she was 100% correct in 2018.
It is Kemp that needs the benefit of the doubt against her charges.
Comparing her refusal to concede in 2018 with what Trump and his party did in 2020 is comparing apples to bananas.
Abrams was running against Secretary of State Kemp who in his position of SOS had power over his own election.
That is a 100% conflict of interest and he should have recused himself from every election related issue. He didn’t.
Abrams acknowledged her loss to Kemp days after the 2018 election. But she attributed that defeat — by less than 1.4 percentage points — to efforts by Kemp, to suppress voter turnout. Kemp denied the allegations.
“The issues that I raised in 2018 were not grounded in making me the governor,” Abrams told The 19th’s Editor-at-Large Errin Haines at a Monday event. “Not a single lawsuit filed would have reversed or changed the outcome of the election. My point was that the access to the election was flawed, and I refuse to concede a system that permits citizens to be denied access. That is very different than someone claiming fraudulent outcome.”
I gave this mashal before on YWN . If the Jews in Lakewood would have enough people to elect a Republican Governor, Murphy could simply assign one polling station for all of Lakewood, Toms River, Manchester and Jackson.
Or he could purge 100,000 jews from the voter rolls and when they show up to vote , the polling station says ” Sorry, go home and bring proof that you still live here and we will let you vote.”
Or he could put their registration on hold due to the “exact match” law, which puts someone’s voting status on hold if the information they put on their registration form doesn’t exactly match their driver’s license or social security records.
That is exactly what Kemp did in 2018.
Did he legally win ? Yes. Did he prevent people from voting ? Yes.
Was it illegitimate ? yes.