Jackk – You said,”The Durham report does not say that the Clinton campaign spied on spied on Donald Trump, both as a candidate and as president.
The court filing also definitely does not say that the Clinton campaign hired tech executives to “infiltrate” Trump Tower and White House servers in an attempt to create a narrative linking Trump to Russia.
In fact the word infiltrate is not found in the report at all.”
I then asked, “So jackk, what does it say? I was very curious to hear a clarification cuz it seems nobody is responding.”
to which you responded, “The Durham court filing is publicly available and everyone can read it.
It is a little complicated to actually explain since it has to do with DNS and other esoteric IT acronyms.
It also about only one person – Mr. Sussman.
But it has nothing to do with spying or infiltration.”
You implied you were using your personal knowledge, NOT mainstream media, to make those claims. Now you admit you didn’t. And on top of that you want ME to tell you what it says so you can respond with what you read online.
Again – infomation you read from your news sources is no more valid than a fox news report or a coworkers blabbering. Either read the docs and tell us what you saw, or don’t claim to know more than someone else who also watches news clips. That’s all I said, and I think i was pretty straightforward. Honestly, I didn’t expect that you would have presented information you didn’t really know, had I known I wouldn’t have bothered with even asking for clarification.