Home › Forums › Decaffeinated Coffee › Kyle Rittenhouse › Reply To: Kyle Rittenhouse
This evolving into a Democratic Ploy against President Trump where evidence and charges keep evolving, which work in impeachment where anything goes, but not in criminal court. Or to quote former President Clinton “it all depends on what is means”. You keep changing what you claim you mean.
In Manhattan one of the most liberal counties in New York State and perhaps the country, the DA Cy Vance has been trying to indict Trump & his company for over 2.5 years without success, This is eventhough there is a saying “You can indict a ham sandwich”. The reason is that anyone can be indicted but once it comes to the trial the case will be dismissed unless there is evidence to support it.
The DA has hundreds if not thousands of cases pending at any given time. All of these cases have been investigated by the Police or Sherriff’s office and are awaiting prosecution. Why would the DA take on a new case which he has to investigate and subpoena evidence before he can prosecute?
The vast majority of the hundreds of backlogged cases are violent cases, so why is your fraud case going to get precedent esspecially when you are not articulating how the DA is going to win a conviction.