emes > people promoting fraud, before the election said that if Trump loses it must be fraud
You may not convince some people, but there are always moderate reasonable people – like me, who can be either convinced or at least pacified not to protest. I try not to pay attention to all protestation because these are like one witness in beis din – what do you do with that unverified information? But there are some things that can be improved or should not have happened.
Surely, all changes made in the name of pandemic raise suspicion. Just making election a multi-day affair is a force multiplier for the activists: in one day, they can approach so many people. in 10 days – 10 times more.
All the polls that were claimed to be “suppression” are now evaluated to be worst in 20-40 years – 4-5% towards Biden and Ds in general. So, claim confirmed, the question is only whether it is mazid or not.
Pfizer delay of vaccine results after election: I ran numbers this way and that and I do not see what was the reason for the delay. The only charitable explanation is that someone strongly preferred to have a sample larger than initially agreed to exclude a chance of data looking not-so-good.
Suppressing NY Post article about Hunter, while at the same time not disclosing (both officially and not) fact of active investigation.
Making fun of Trump for blaming virus on Chinese and now agreeing that this is reasonable.
Not challenging Biden on what exactly is his Federal plan is to distribute vaccine better. (He still keeps it secret while vaccination rates declined).
All together this creates a very bad vibe of unfairness that enables even craziest conspiracy theories. It might be better for moderate Dems to make some conciliatory steps and admit some problems.