Search
Close this search box.

Background Checks Blocked A Record High 300,000 Gun Sales


The number of people stopped from buying guns through the U.S. background check system hit an all-time high of more than 300,000 last year amid a surge of firearm sales, according to new records obtained by the group Everytown for Gun Safety.

The FBI numbers provided to The Associated Press show the background checks blocked nearly twice as many gun sales in 2020 as in the year before. About 42% of those denials were because the would-be buyers had felony convictions on their records.

The increase in blocked gun sales largely tracks with the record-setting surge in sales that took hold along with the coronavirus pandemic and has continued into this year, through historic demonstrations against police brutality, deep political divisions and an insurrection at the U.S. Capitol.

It comes as Congress has failed to pass major legislation on guns despite the Democratic majority and President Joe Biden’s push. A bill that would strengthen background checks is stalled in the Senate. The House in March passed the legislation requiring the checks on all sales and transfers, as well as an expanded 10-day review for gun purchases. Most states require background checks only for sales at federally licensed dealers. But the legislation faces an uphill battle getting any Republican support in the Senate.

According to the data, the rate of barred would-be gun buyers also increased somewhat over the previous two years, from about 0.6% to 0.8%. That could be in part because many of the people who tried to get guns in 2020 were buying them for the first time and may not have been aware that they were legally barred from owning them, said Adam Winkler, a UCLA Law professor specializing in gun policy.

“Some may have a felony conviction on their record and not think about it,” he said.

Making a false statement in connection with a background check is a felony punishable by up to 10 years in prison and a hefty fine, but few people are prosecuted for what would amount to lying on the form filled out before a gun purchase, he said.

In 2017, just 12 of the 112,000 people denied a gun purchase, about 0.01%, were federally prosecuted, largely due to limited resources for the time-intensive investigations, according to a U.S. Government Accountability Office report.

Everytown’s research found that 16% of would-be gun buyers in 2020 were prohibited by state law, like the extreme-risk protection orders or red-flag laws passed in several states. Another 12% were related to domestic violence, either people subject to a protective order or convicted of a misdemeanor domestic violence crime.

The data shows how necessary the legislation is, said Sarah Burd-Sharps, Everytown’s director of research.

“There’s no question that background checks work, but the system is working overtime to prevent a record number of people with dangerous prohibitors from being able to buy firearms,” she said in a statement. “The loopholes in the law allow people to avoid the system, even if they just meet online or at a gun show for the first time.”

(AP)



4 Responses

  1. The third paragraph of this article contains the real news. It says, “The increase in blocked gun sales largely tracks with the record-setting surge in sales ….” So the background checks are not working any better, the numbers are up because attempted purchases are up.

  2. this country is moving towards a war/breakdown of order/breakup at a break-neck speed.
    It seems all the evil ones had come out of their proverbial “closets” and openly embraced their wickedness. If the good does not comply and submit — trouble!

  3. And yet almost none of these cases will be prosecuted. And it’s NOT for lack of resources. The FBI has all the resources it needs for this. But since the background check law came into effect more than 20 years ago, there have been almost no prosecutions for illegally attempting to purchase.

    The most reasonable explanation is that they don’t try to prosecute because most of these denials are false positives, and they’re afraid everyone will find that out. The next most reasonable explanation is that they’re afraid if they start prosecuting the number of bad applications will go down, as there will suddenly be a disincentive, and then they’ll have nothing to crow about.

Leave a Reply


Popular Posts