phil
ubiquitin, “where is the source and where is the proof that 96% percent of doctors took the test? ”
It was an AMA survey
“From CNN or the NYT perhaps?”
I’m sure they reported on it.
“DNA 100% produces RNA.”
So not quite. DNA is used as a template for RNA, the DNA doesnt really produce the RNA, but as mentioned the difference here MAY be semantics (if the rest of your comments made sense). ITs kind of like saying a Tikkun produces a sefer Torah. Not really, the Sofer copies the Tikkun when he produces a Torah.
” The shot 100% modifies the RNA response.”
So not at all. RNA response to what? The shot provides mRNA that humans otherwise wouldnt have . IT doesnt modify any response to anything
“Absolutely no one disputes this”
I havent even heard anyone make your claim befrore (modifies RNA repsonse) I’m not sure I know what you mean, and pretty sure you dont know either.
” (unless one has no knowledge of how the shot works) ”
Forget how the shot works, you comments betray a lack of a highschool understanding of Biochemistry. I’m happy to explain if you are interested.
” It’s on many of covid-19 shots manufacturers websites. ”
It isn’t.
“The only point of contention is if the DNA response itself gets modified”
This isnt a point of contention at all. there is no human mechanism for RNA to affect DNA.
” or only the RNAs response is modified….but nobody disputes that this shot modifies the RNAs response, that is how the shot works.”
No it isn’t . Like not even a little bit.
Oppose the vaccine all you want.
Just Dont make stuff up please