Ubiq -“The court did not hear the case .
It is on conference days (NOT argument days) that Certiori is granted/denied . note Judges conference is PRIVATE. “According to Supreme Court protocol, only the Justices are allowed in the Conference room at this time—no police, law clerks, secretaries, etc” (source UScourts . gov)
There is no hearing, there are no arguments. The Justices discuss cases that had been heard and whether should hear others”
You have a very Short memory.
Remember this from a few posts ago?
“Actually your definition of “heard”, is Not the Legal Definition!
From dictionary.law.com:
Heard comes from Hearing:
“Any proceeding before a Judge or other magistrate, w/o a jury in which evidence and/or argument is presented to determine some issue of fact or both issues of fact and law. Etc.”
So they heard the case on the day of a conference.
You wrote -“It is on conference days (NOT argument days) that Certiori is granted/denied”.
So do they come to the conclusion?
They don’t flip a coin to make this decision!
I’ll tell you:
They read the case and they make decisions on it.
This case had the evidence in the motion and then they decided that they will give a Judgment of Moot!
So they did Hear the case, even though you keep Lying, like this -“The court did not hear the case”.
I gave you the definition of “Hearing” – 2 times already.
I know that you are having Trouble differentiationing Between the Layman’s definition and the Legal definition!
And like you said -“and if you have any lingering questions I’ll of course gladly answer”!