Fair enough, sorry for putting you on the spot. 8ts an argument I’ve heard before which while fine in theory, falls apart quickly in practice. I was hoping you’d flesh it out a bit more.
Your not putting me on the spot, I have no need to know the answer because it’s not germane to my point
It’s a distraction meant to obfuscate lack of a cogent direct rational rejoinder.
I choose not to engage. See my previous post where I explained in detail.
The idea that any individual person has constitutional right to rise up against the govt if he thinks they are tyrannical is a position that stretches the imagination to the point thst most would acknowledge it can’t be true.
Total conjecture. I disagree. Most haven’t thought about it, is my opinion.